Skip to main content
The American Journal of Pathology logoLink to The American Journal of Pathology
. 2007 Jan;170(1):16–19. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.061011

Linking Selective Vulnerability to Cell Death Mechanisms in Parkinson’s Disease

Dennis W Dickson 1
PMCID: PMC1762677  PMID: 17200178

Two of the major unresolved questions in neurodegenerative diseases are the factors that determine which neurons degenerate and by what mechanism this occurs. There are several leads when it comes to Parkinson’s disease, and the studies reported by Zhu et al1 in this issue of The American Journal of Pathology suggest that there may be a link between oxidative stress and nonapoptotic cell death involving autophagic cellular mechanisms.

Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by selective loss of specific populations of neurons. The distribution of neuronal loss determines the clinical phenotype and is a more powerful determinant than underlying molecular pathology. For example, degenerative diseases that affect the frontal lobe have diverse molecular biology, but they all are capable of producing a similar clinical syndrome.2 Likewise, damage to the dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra that project to the putamen, known as the nigrostriatal pathway, are affected in a number of disorders that produce parkinsonism, the clinical syndrome associated with slowing of movements, rigidity, tremors, and postural instability. The most common neurodegenerative disorders associated with parkinsonism are listed in Table 1, which demonstrates diversity with respect to both molecular biology and histopathology. It is increasingly clear that neuronal vulnerability in Parkinson’s disease extends far beyond the substantia nigra and includes specific neurons in autonomic ganglia, spinal cord, brainstem, basal forebrain, limbic lobe, and even the neocortex,3 but degeneration of the nigrostriatal pathway remains the feature that is most relevant for the parkinsonian clinical syndrome. There are hints as to why the dopaminergic neurons would be selectively vulnerable in Parkinson’s disease (see below), but as yet there is no plau-sible explanation for vulnerability of other neuronal populations.

Table 1.

Molecular Pathology of Parkinsonism

Disorder Molecular pathology Major morphologic feature
Parkinson’s disease α-Synuclein Lewy bodies
Dementia with Lewy bodies α-Synuclein Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites
Multiple system atrophy α-Synuclein Glial cytoplasmic inclusions
Progressive supranuclear palsy Tau Neurofibrillary tangles and tufted astrocytes
Corticobasal degeneration Tau Neuropil threads and astrocytic plaques
Guam Parkinson dementia complex Tau Neurofibrillary tangles
Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism TDP4338 Neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions

The basis of selective vulnerability in neurodegenerative disease is largely unknown. Specific features of neuronal phenotype are most often implicated. Several examples illustrate the state of current knowledge. It has been suggested that distribution of cortical neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease correlates with patterns of developmental myelination, with neurons in association areas with minimal myelination being more vulnerable than neurons in primary cortices with more extensive and later myelination.4 Stress-associated neuronal loss in the hippocampus has been shown to correlate with the distribution of glucocorticoid receptors in this brain region.5 Neurons deficient in calcium buffering proteins, such as parvalbumin and calbindin, may render them vulnerable in motor neuron disease.6 Specific glutamate receptor subtypes in hippocampal neuronal subpopulations may account for selective neuronal vulnerability mediated by excitotoxic cell death in epilepsy and hypoxia.7 Finally, the susceptibility of dopamine and its metabolites to produce reactive oxygen intermediates may explain vulnerability of substantia nigra neurons.8

Support for oxidative stress mechanisms in dopaminergic degeneration in the substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease9 comes from a growing body of evidence, indicating that this region has a high propensity for oxidative stress and is also deficient in protective mechanisms. In addition to dopamine and its metabolites, which may have an intrinsic tendency to form reactive oxygen species, the substantia nigra is also rich in iron and copper, essential cofactors in biosynthetic enzymes involved in catecholamine metabolism such as tryosine hydroxylase and dopamine β-hydroxylase. The oxidation-reduction cycle of iron can generate free radicals and toxic metabolites (eg, hydrogen peroxide). Mitochondrial abnormalities (eg, deficiency in the mitochondrial respiratory chain complex 1), which lead to uncoupling of redox reactions and generation of reactive oxygen species, have also been implicated in Parkinson’s disease.10 There is also evidence that the substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease may be deficient in antioxidant molecules such as glutathione.11

Many neurodegenerative disorders, including most of the parkinsonian disorders, are characterized by neuronal or glia inclusions or both (see Table 1). The hallmark histopathological lesion in Parkinson’s disease is the Lewy body, a neuronal cytoplasmic filamentous aggregate composed of the presynaptic protein α-synuclein. Although recent evidence from experimental models suggests that inclusion formation may play an adaptive or protective response,12 in human neurodegenerative diseases, the presence and distribution of inclusions closely parallels neuronal loss. This argues that if inclusions are an adaptive response, the response is ultimately ineffective. There are reasons to suspect that inclusion bodies contribute to disease pathogenesis through one of several means. The inclusions are for the most part composed of abnormal conformers of normal proteins, and pathological protein conformers have toxic properties in cell culture experiments and experimental models. The mechanisms for toxicity include loss of function due to sequestration of proteins essential to normal cellular physiology, disruption of cellular functions due to mass effects of the inclusions (eg, disrupting axoplasmic transport), disruption of proteolytic processing (eg, lysosomal or proteasomal), and induction of cell stress through unfolded protein response or oxidative stress related to posttranslational modifications of the abnormal conformers.13

In addition to selective vulnerability, the other major unsolved research question related to neurodegenerative disorders is the mechanism of neuronal death. Although apoptotic cell death is an appealing mechanism for neuronal loss in degenerative disease,14 and cells with morphological features consistent with apoptosis are sometimes detected in Parkinson’s disease,15 there is increasing experimental evidence that apoptosis probably does not play a major role in neuronal loss in the substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease.16,17 Postmortem artifacts, specifically postmortem DNA fragmentation, may account for at least some of the reports of apoptosis in the substantia nigra that relied on terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling techniques.18

The major nonapoptotic form of cell death is necrosis, which is not likely to play a major role in neurodegenerative diseases because it is associated with energy failure, cell swelling, and rupture with ensuing inflammation, features that are largely absent in neurodegenerative disorders. Increasing interest has focused on autophagy and lysosomal pathways in cell death.19 Autophagy is a fundamental cell process associated with phagocytosis of cellular organelles and other cytoplasmic constituents that can be initiated internally, as in nutrient deprivation, or by external signaling cascades.20 In Parkinson’s disease, there is increasing evidence that autophagy plays a role in degeneration and cell death. For example, neurons in the substantia nigra display autophagic features,15 cellular models with overexpression of mutant α-synuclein show signs of autophagy,21 dopamine can induce autophagic cell death as well as α-synuclein expression,22 and axonal dystrophy, which is common in Parkinson’s substantia nigra, can be induced by autophagy.23

A link between oxidative stress and autophagic cell death has been the focus of several recent reviews.24–26 Oxidative stress has been implicated in cellular models for Parkinson’s disease using the neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridium, the active metabolite of 1-methyl 4-phenyl 1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP).1 MPTP was discovered as a toxin that produced parkinsonism in users of elicit drugs, and subsequently, it has been widely used in animal models that faithfully reproduce a number of the clinical and pathological features of nigrostriatal degeneration in Parkinson’s disease.27–29 The most probable mechanism of MPTP toxicity is oxidative stress because it has been shown to be an inhibitor of the mitochondrial respiratory chain complex 1, leading to uncoupling and generation of reactive oxygen species.29 The study by Zhu and coworkers1 in this issue of the AJP provides compelling evidence, using cell biological as well as ultrastructural analyses, that exposure of both neuroblastoma cell lines and primary dopaminergic neurons to MPTP induces autophagy. Of interest is the fact that the authors were able to determine that the autophagy was distinct from that induced by nutrient withdrawal, a process that has been extensively studied in yeast and has lead to a number of useful biological tools for dissecting this process, because it is dependent on proteins that are shared among a wide range of eukaryotic species.30 The autophagic toxicity induced by MPTP, which presumably is mediated by oxidative stress, is dependent on extracellular signal related kinases such as mitogen-activated protein kinases.

The wider significance of this observation is that the most common genetic basis of Parkinson’s disease is mutation in a mitogen-activated protein kinase. Specifically, mutations in the gene for leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2)31,32 account for about 3% of seemingly sporadic Parkinson’s disease, with as high as 40% of familial Parkinson’s disease depending on the cohort.33–36 Although much work remains to be done to determine whether the mechanism of LRRK2 mutations is through kinase-dependent signaling pathways, preliminary evidence suggests that this is the case.37 The intriguing possibility raised by the study of Zhu and coworkers is that this kinase activation lies downstream of autophagic processes that may lead to neurodegeneration. In susceptible neurons in the substantia nigra, this process may be inextricably linked to oxidative stress, although it remains to be determined whether similar mechanisms apply to nondopaminergic neurons widespread throughout the neuraxis that are selectively vulnerable to α-synuclein-associated neurodegeneration and cell death in Parkinson’s disease.

Footnotes

Address reprint requests to Dennis W. Dickson, M.D., Neuropathology Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224. E-mail: dickson.dennis@mayo.edu.

See Related Article on page 75

Supported by the Morris K. Udall Parkinson’s Disease Research Center of Excellence grant P50-NS40256.

This commentary relates to Zhu et al, Am J Pathol 2007, 170:75–86, published in this issue.

References

  1. Zhu JH, Horbinski C, Guo F, Watkins S, Uchiyama Y, Chu CT. Regulation of autophagy by extracellular signal related protein kinases during 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridium injury. Am J Pathol. 2007;170:75–86. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Shi J, Shaw CL, Du Plessis D, Richardson AM, Bailey KL, Julien C, Stopford C, Thompson J, Varma A, Craufurd D, Tian J, Pickering-Brown S, Neary D, Snowden JS, Mann DM. Histopathological changes underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration with clinicopathological correlation. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 2005;110:501–512. doi: 10.1007/s00401-005-1079-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braak H, Del Tredici K, Rub U, de Vos RA, Jansen Steur EN, Braak E. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24:197–211. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00065-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Braak H, Del Tredici K, Schultz C, Braak E. Vulnerability of select neuronal types to Alzheimer’s disease. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2000;924:53–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05560.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McEwen BS, Sapolsky RM. Stress and cognitive function. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995;5:205–216. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80028-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shaw PJ, Eggett CJ. Molecular factors underlying selective vulnerability of motor neurons to neurodegeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol. 2000;247(Suppl 1):I17–I27. doi: 10.1007/BF03161151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rothman SM, Olney JW. Glutamate and the pathophysiology of hypoxic—ischemic brain damage. Ann Neurol. 1986;19:105–111. doi: 10.1002/ana.410190202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Olney JW, Zorumski CF, Stewart GR, Price MT, Wang GJ, Labruyere J. Excitotoxicity of L-dopa and 6-OH-dopa: implications for Parkinson’s and Huntington’s diseases. Exp Neurol. 1990;108:269–272. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(90)90134-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jenner P, Dexter DT, Sian J, Schapira AH, Marsden CD. Oxidative stress as a cause of nigral cell death in Parkinson’s disease and incidental Lewy body disease. The Royal Kings and Queens Parkinson’s Disease Research Group. Ann Neurol. 1992;32(Suppl):S82–S87. doi: 10.1002/ana.410320714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schapira AH, Mann VM, Cooper JM, Krige D, Jenner PJ, Marsden CD. Mitochondrial function in Parkinson’s disease. The Royal Kings and Queens Parkinson’s Disease Research Group. Ann Neurol. 1992;32(Suppl):S116–S124. doi: 10.1002/ana.410320720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sian J, Dexter DT, Lees AJ, Daniel S, Agid Y, Javoy-Agid F, Jenner P, Marsden CD. Alterations in glutathione levels in Parkinson’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders affecting basal ganglia. Ann Neurol. 1994;36:348–355. doi: 10.1002/ana.410360305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Berger Z, Davies JE, Luo S, Pasco MY, Majoul I, O’Kane CJ, Rubinsztein DC. Deleterious and protective properties of an aggregate-prone protein with a polyalanine expansion. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:453–465. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. “Fatal attractions” of proteins. A comprehensive hypothetical mechanism underlying Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2000;924:62–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05561.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Graeber MB, Moran LB. Mechanisms of cell death in neurodegenerative diseases: fashion, fiction, and facts. Brain Pathol. 2002;12:385–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2002.tb00452.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Anglade P, Vyas S, Javoy-Agid F, Herrero MT, Michel PP, Marquez J, Mouatt-Prigent A, Ruberg M, Hirsch EC, Agid Y. Apoptosis and autophagy in nigral neurons of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Histol Histopathol. 1997;12:25–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jellinger KA. Cell death mechanisms in Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm. 2000;107:1–29. doi: 10.1007/s007020050001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Banati RB, Daniel SE, Blunt SB. Glial pathology but absence of apoptotic nigral neurons in long-standing Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 1998;13:221–227. doi: 10.1002/mds.870130205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kingsbury AE, Mardsen CD, Foster OJ. DNA fragmentation in human substantia nigra: apoptosis or perimortem effect? Mov Disord. 1998;13:877–884. doi: 10.1002/mds.870130604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bursch W. The autophagosomal-lysosomal compartment in programmed cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2001;8:569–581. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chu CT. Autophagic stress in neuronal injury and disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006;65:423–432. doi: 10.1097/01.jnen.0000229233.75253.be. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stefanis L, Larsen KE, Rideout HJ, Sulzer D, Greene LA. Expression of A53T mutant but not wild-type alpha-synuclein in PC12 cells induces alterations of the ubiquitin-dependent degradation system, loss of dopamine release, and autophagic cell death. J Neurosci. 2001;21:9549–9560. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-24-09549.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gómez-Santos C, Ferrer I, Santidrian AF, Barrachina M, Gil J, Ambrosio S. Dopamine induces autophagic cell death and alpha-synuclein increase in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. J Neurosci Res. 2003;73:341–350. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang QJ, Ding Y, Kohtz DS, Mizushima N, Cristea IM, Rout MP, Chait BT, Zhong Y, Heintz N, Yue Z. Induction of autophagy in axonal dystrophy and degeneration. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8057–8068. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2261-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Keller JN, Dimayuga E, Chen Q, Thorpe J, Gee J, Ding Q. Autophagy, proteasomes, lipofuscin, and oxidative stress in the aging brain. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:2376–2391. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Butler D, Bahr BA. Oxidative stress and lysosomes: CNS-related consequences and implications for lysosomal enhancement strategies and induction of autophagy. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006;8:185–196. doi: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kiffin R, Bandyopadhyay U, Cuervo AM. Oxidative stress and autophagy. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006;8:152–162. doi: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Burns RS, Chiueh CC, Markey SP, Ebert MH, Jacobowitz DM, Kopin IJ. A primate model of parkinsonism: selective destruction of dopaminergic neurons in the pars compacta of the substantia nigra by N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983;80:4546–4550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.14.4546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Langston JW. MPTP: insights into the etiology of Parkinson’s disease. Eur Neurol. 1987;26(Suppl 1):2–10. doi: 10.1159/000116349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gerlach M, Riederer P, Przuntek H, Youdim MB. MPTP mechanisms of neurotoxicity and their implications for Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991;208:273–286. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(91)90073-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Reggiori F, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy in the eukaryotic cell. Eukaryot Cell. 2002;1:11–21. doi: 10.1128/EC.01.1.11-21.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zimprich A, Biskup S, Leitner P, Lichtner P, Farrer M, Lincoln S, Kachergus J, Hulihan M, Uitti RJ, Calne DB, Stoessl AJ, Pfeiffer RF, Patenge N, Carbajal IC, Vieregge P, Asmus F, Muller-Myhsok B, Dickson DW, Meitinger T, Strom TM, Wszolek ZK, Gasser T. Mutations in LRRK2 cause autosomal-dominant parkinsonism with pleomorphic pathology. Neuron. 2004;44:601–607. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Paisán-Ruíz C, Jain S, Evans EW, Gilks WP, Simon J, van der Brug M, Lopez de Munain A, Aparicio S, Gil AM, Khan N, Johnson J, Martinez JR, Nicholl D, Carrera IM, Pena AS, de Silva R, Lees A, Marti-Masso JF, Perez-Tur J, Wood NW, Singleton AB. Cloning of the gene containing mutations that cause PARK8-linked Parkinson’s disease. Neuron. 2004;44:595–600. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gilks WP, Abou-Sleiman PM, Gandhi S, Jain S, Singleton A, Lees AJ, Shaw K, Bhatia KP, Bonifati V, Quinn NP, Lynch J, Healy DG, Holton JL, Revesz T, Wood NW. A common LRRK2 mutation in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2005;365:415–416. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17830-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Di Fonzo A, Rohe CF, Ferreira J, Chien HF, Vacca L, Stocchi F, Guedes L, Fabrizio E, Manfredi M, Vanacore N, Goldwurm S, Breedveld G, Sampaio C, Meco G, Barbosa E, Oostra BA, Bonifati V, Italian Parkinson Genetics Network A frequent LRRK2 gene mutation associated with autosomal dominant Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2005;365:412–415. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17829-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nichols WC, Pankratz N, Hernandez D, Paisan-Ruiz C, Jain S, Halter CA, Michaels VE, Reed T, Rudolph A, Shults CW, Singleton A, Foroud T, Parkinson Study Group-PROGENI investigators Genetic screening for a single common LRRK2 mutation in familial Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2005;365:410–412. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17828-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mata IF, Ross OA, Kachergus J, Huerta C, Ribacoba R, Moris G, Blazquez M, Guisasola LM, Salvador C, Martinez C, Farrer M, Alvarez V. LRRK2 mutations are a common cause of Parkinson’s disease in Spain. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:391–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith WW, Pei Z, Jiang H, Dawson VL, Dawson TM, Ross CA. Kinase activity of mutant LRRK2 mediates neuronal toxicity. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:1231–1233. doi: 10.1038/nn1776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Neumann M, Sampathu DM, Kwong LK, Truax AC, Micsenyi MC, Chou TT, Bruce J, Schuck T, Grossman M, Clark CM, McCluskey LF, Miller BL, Masliah E, Mackenzie IR, Feldman H, Feiden W, Kretzschmar HA, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2006;314:130–133. doi: 10.1126/science.1134108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Pathology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Investigative Pathology

RESOURCES