Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1975 Sep;27(5):614–627.

Effects of various medical and social pracitices on the frequency of genetic disorders.

S M Holloway, C Smith
PMCID: PMC1762830  PMID: 1163536

Abstract

The effects of a number of new medical and social practices on the incidence of genetic diseases and gene frequency have been studied. The results deal with short-term effects, since these are of most practical importance, and with the combined effects of several factors acting together. The size of any effects depends on the feasibility of the different practices and on the extent to which they are adopted by the population. Most of the practices reduce the incidence of the diseases in the next generation, but some may be dysgenic. For example, improved treatment of affected individuals in dominant and X-linked diseases could lead to improved reproductive fitness, higher gene frequencies, and to an increased incidence in future generations. However, such deleterious effects may be avoided by genetic counseling or offset by other preventive practices. In recessive disorders, a small reduction in the average fitness of carfiers detected by population screening would outweigh any deleterious effects of other practices. In general there seems to be little cause for alarm about the deleteious effects of the new medical and social practices being adopted.

Full text

PDF
614

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Crow J. F. Rates of genetic change under selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Mar;59(3):655–661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.59.3.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Culliton B. J. Sickle cell anemia: the route from obscurity to prominence. Science. 1972 Oct 13;178(4057):138–142. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4057.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fraser G. R. The implications of prevention and treatment of inherited disease for the genetic future of mankind. J Genet Hum. 1972 Sep;20(3):185–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fraser G. R. The short-term reduction in birth incidence of recessive diseases as a result of genetic counselling after the birth of an affected child. Hum Hered. 1972;22(1):1–6. doi: 10.1159/000152460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Holloway S. M., Smith C. Equilibrium frequencies in X-linked recessive disease. Am J Hum Genet. 1973 Jul;25(4):388–396. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mayo O. On the effects of genetic counselling on gene frequencies. Hum Hered. 1970;20(4):361–370. doi: 10.1159/000152332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Morton N. E. Population genetics and disease control. Soc Biol. 1971 Sep;18(3):243–251. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1971.9987926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Motulsky A. G., Fraser G. R., Felsenstein J. Public health and long-term genetic implications of intrauterine diagnosis and selective abortion. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1971 Apr;7(5):22–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES