Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 2002 Oct;87(4):297–301. doi: 10.1136/adc.87.4.297

Heart murmurs recorded by a sensor based electronic stethoscope and e-mailed for remote assessment

L Dahl 1, P Hasvold 1, E Arild 1, T Hasvold 1, C Wren 1, L Dahl 1, P Hasvold 1, E Arild 1, T Hasvold 1
PMCID: PMC1763039  PMID: 12244000

Abstract

Background: Heart murmurs are common in children, and they are often referred to a specialist for examination. A clinically innocent murmur does not need further investigation. The referral area of the University Hospital is large and sparsely populated. A new service for remote auscultation (telemedicine) of heart murmurs in children was established where heart sounds and short texts were sent as an attachment to e-mails.

Aim: To assess the clinical quality of this method.

Methods: Heart sounds from 47 patients with no murmur (n = 7), with innocent murmurs (n = 20), or with pathological murmurs (n = 20) were recorded using a sensor based stethoscope and e-mailed to a remote computer. The sounds were repeated, giving 100 cases that were randomly distributed on a compact disc. Four cardiologists assessed and categorised the cases as having "no murmur", "innocent murmur", or "pathological murmur", recorded the assessment time per case, their degree of certainty, and whether they recommended referral.

Results: On average, 2.1 minutes were spent on each case. The mean sensitivity and specificity were 89.7% and 98.2% respectively, and the inter-observer and intra-observer variabilities were low (kappa 0.81 and 0.87), respectively. A total of 93.4% of cases with a pathological murmur and 12.6% of cases with an innocent murmur were recommended for referral.

Conclusion: Telemedical referral of patients with heart murmurs for remote assessment by a cardiologist is safe and saves time. Skilled auscultation is adequate to detect patients with innocent murmurs.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (99.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Advani N., Menahem S., Wilkinson J. L. The diagnosis of innocent murmurs in childhood. Cardiol Young. 2000 Oct;10(4):340–342. doi: 10.1017/s104795110000963x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Belmont J. M., Mattioli L. F., Goertz K. K., Ardinger R. H., Jr, Thomas C. M. Evaluation of remote stethoscopy for pediatric telecardiology. Telemed J. 1995 Summer;1(2):133–149. doi: 10.1089/tmj.1.1995.1.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg W. A., Campassi C., Langenberg P., Sexton M. J. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jun;174(6):1769–1777. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Danford D. A. Clinical and basic laboratory assessment of children for possible congenital heart disease. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2000 Oct;12(5):487–491. doi: 10.1097/00008480-200010000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Danford D. A., Nasir A., Gumbiner C. Cost assessment of the evaluation of heart murmurs in children. Pediatrics. 1993 Feb;91(2):365–368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DeGroff C. G., Bhatikar S., Hertzberg J., Shandas R., Valdes-Cruz L., Mahajan R. L. Artificial neural network-based method of screening heart murmurs in children. Circulation. 2001 Jun 5;103(22):2711–2716. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.22.2711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Donker D. K., van Geijn H. P., Hasman A. Interobserver variation in the assessment of fetal heart rate recordings. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993 Nov;52(1):21–28. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90220-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elmore J. G., Wells C. K., Lee C. H., Howard D. H., Feinstein A. R. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 1;331(22):1493–1499. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199412013312206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FOGEL D. H. The innocent systolic murmur in children: a clinical study of its incidence and characteristics. Am Heart J. 1960 Jun;59:844–855. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(60)90408-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fleisher Barry E., Baum David, Brudos Ginger, Burge Mary, Carson Elaine, Constantinou Janet, Duckworth Josh, Gamberg Pat, Klein Pat, Luikart Helen. Infant heart transplantation at Stanford: growth and neurodevelopmental outcome. Pediatrics. 2002 Jan;109(1):1–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gaskin P. R., Owens S. E., Talner N. S., Sanders S. P., Li J. S. Clinical auscultation skills in pediatric residents. Pediatrics. 2000 Jun;105(6):1184–1187. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.6.1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gaskin P. R., Owens S. E., Talner N. S., Sanders S. P., Li J. S. Clinical auscultation skills in pediatric residents. Pediatrics. 2000 Jun;105(6):1184–1187. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.6.1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Geva T., Hegesh J., Frand M. Reappraisal of the approach to the child with heart murmurs: is echocardiography mandatory? Int J Cardiol. 1988 Apr;19(1):107–113. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(88)90196-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grant J. M. The fetal heart rate trace is normal, isn't it? Observer agreement of categorical assessments. Lancet. 1991 Jan 26;337(8735):215–218. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92169-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haney I., Ipp M., Feldman W., McCrindle B. W. Accuracy of clinical assessment of heart murmurs by office based (general practice) paediatricians. Arch Dis Child. 1999 Nov;81(5):409–412. doi: 10.1136/adc.81.5.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hicks L. L., Boles K. E., Hudson S. T., Koenig S., Madsen R., Kling B., Tracy J., Mitchell J., Webb W. An evaluation of satisfaction with telemedicine among health-care professionals. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6(4):209–215. doi: 10.1258/1357633001935374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Katumba-Lunyenya J. L. Neonatal/infant echocardiography by the non-cardiologist: a personal practice, past, present, and future. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002 Jan;86(1):F55–F57. doi: 10.1136/fn.86.1.F55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mair F., Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1517–1520. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McConnell M. E., Steed R. D., Tichenor J. M., Hannon D. W. Interactive telecardiology for the evaluation of heart murmurs in children. Telemed J. 1999 Summer;5(2):157–161. doi: 10.1089/107830299312113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McCrindle B. W., Shaffer K. M., Kan J. S., Zahka K. G., Rowe S. A., Kidd L. An evaluation of parental concerns and misperceptions about heart murmurs. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1995 Jan;34(1):25–31. doi: 10.1177/000992289503400105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McCrindle B. W., Shaffer K. M., Kan J. S., Zahka K. G., Rowe S. A., Kidd L. Cardinal clinical signs in the differentiation of heart murmurs in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Feb;150(2):169–174. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170270051007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mulholland H. C., Casey F., Brown D., Corrigan N., Quinn M., McCord B., Rogers J., Craig B. G. Application of a low cost telemedicine link to the diagnosis of neonatal congenital heart defects by remote consultation. Heart. 1999 Aug;82(2):217–221. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.2.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mulholland H. C., Casey F., Brown D., Corrigan N., Quinn M., McCord B., Rogers J., Craig B. G. Application of a low cost telemedicine link to the diagnosis of neonatal congenital heart defects by remote consultation. Heart. 1999 Aug;82(2):217–221. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.2.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Murdison K. A. Telemedicine: a useful tool for the pediatric cardiologist. Telemed J. 1997 Summer;3(2):179–184. doi: 10.1089/tmj.1.1997.3.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Newburger J. W., Rosenthal A., Williams R. G., Fellows K., Miettinen O. S. Noninvasive tests in the initial evaluation of heart murmurs in children. N Engl J Med. 1983 Jan 13;308(2):61–64. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198301133080201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nielsen P. V., Stigsby B., Nickelsen C., Nim J. Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;66(5):421–424. doi: 10.3109/00016348709022046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rajakumar K., Weisse M., Rosas A., Gunel E., Pyles L., Neal W. A., Balian A., Einzig S. Comparative study of clinical evaluation of heart murmurs by general pediatricians and pediatric cardiologists. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1999 Sep;38(9):511–518. doi: 10.1177/000992289903800902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rajakumar K., Weisse M., Rosas A., Gunel E., Pyles L., Neal W. A., Balian A., Einzig S. Comparative study of clinical evaluation of heart murmurs by general pediatricians and pediatric cardiologists. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1999 Sep;38(9):511–518. doi: 10.1177/000992289903800902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Smythe J. F., Teixeira O. H., Vlad P., Demers P. P., Feldman W. Initial evaluation of heart murmurs: are laboratory tests necessary? Pediatrics. 1990 Oct;86(4):497–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stanger P., Silverman N. H., Foster E. Diagnostic accuracy of pediatric echocardiograms performed in adult laboratories. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Mar 15;83(6):908–914. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)01063-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tandberg D., Kastendieck K. D., Meskin S. Observer variation in measured ST-segment elevation. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Oct;34(4 Pt 1):448–452. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)80045-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tavel M. E. Cardiac auscultation. A glorious past--but does it have a future? Circulation. 1996 Mar 15;93(6):1250–1253. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.6.1250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tavel M. E. Cardiac auscultation. A glorious past--but does it have a future? Circulation. 1996 Mar 15;93(6):1250–1253. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.6.1250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Oort A., Le Blanc-Botden M., De Boo T., Van Der Werf T., Rohmer J., Daniëls O. The vibratory innocent heart murmur in schoolchildren: difference in auscultatory findings between school medical officers and a pediatric cardiologist. Pediatr Cardiol. 1994 Nov-Dec;15(6):282–287. doi: 10.1007/BF00798121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wong J. A., Meyer R. A. Cost-effective evaluation of heart murmurs in children. Arch Fam Med. 1996 Jul-Aug;5(7):381–381. doi: 10.1001/archfami.5.7.381b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Young P. C. The morbidity of cardiac nondisease revisited. Is there lingering concern associated with an innocent murmur? Am J Dis Child. 1993 Sep;147(9):975–977. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160330065021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES