Abstract
One hundred patients with infections mostly outside of the urinary tract were studied in a prospective, open manner to ascertain the effectiveness and safety of ciprofloxacin in a variety of clinical situations. There were 41 instances of bacteremia, including 38 with Salmonella typhi, and 21 respiratory, 17 skin and skin structure, 11 bone or joint, 6 gastrointestinal, and 4 urinary tract infections. The patients were given 500 mg of ciprofloxacin orally every 12 h for 2 to 107 days (mean, 15.1 days). Microorganisms isolated disclosed susceptibilities comparable to those reported previously, with a MIC for 90% of the strains of 0.25 microgram/ml. For Streptococcus pneumoniae the MIC for 90% of the strains was 0.03 microgram/ml, and it was higher for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (0.5 microgram/ml), although still in the therapeutic range. Levels in blood were lower than those reported in other series, and no accumulation of the drug during treatment was detected. In 88 instances there was resolution of the infectious process, in 7 there was improvement, in 3 there was a failure to respond, and in 2 the clinical response was indeterminate. Bacteriological eradication was documented in 87 infections. Despite extensive clinical and laboratory examinations before, during, and after therapy, no major abnormalities related to therapy were seen; only one patient required discontinuation of ciprofloxacin due to gastrointestinal intolerance. Ciprofloxacin is an effective and safe therapeutic alternative in many tissue infections caused by susceptible microorganisms.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barry A. L., Jones R. N., Thornsberry C., Ayers L. W., Gerlach E. H., Sommers H. M. Antibacterial activities of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, oxolinic acid, cinoxacin, and nalidixic acid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 May;25(5):633–637. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.5.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borobio M. V., Perea E. J. Effect of inoculum, pH, and medium on the activity of ciprofloxacin against anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Mar;25(3):342–343. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.3.342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chin N. X., Neu H. C. Ciprofloxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid compound active against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Mar;25(3):319–326. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.3.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crump B., Wise R., Dent J. Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Nov;24(5):784–786. doi: 10.1128/aac.24.5.784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilman R. H., Terminel M., Levine M. M., Hernandez-Mendosa P., Calderone E., Vasquez V., Martinez E., Snyder M. J., Hornick R. B. Comparison of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and amoxicillin in therapy of chloramphenicol-resistant and chloramphenicol-sensitive typhoid fever. J Infect Dis. 1975 Dec;132(6):630–636. doi: 10.1093/infdis/132.6.630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodman L. J., Fliegelman R. M., Trenholme G. M., Kaplan R. L. Comparative in vitro activity of ciprofloxacin against Campylobacter spp. and other bacterial enteric pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Apr;25(4):504–506. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.4.504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kabir I., Rahaman M. M., Ahmed S. M., Akhter S. Q., Butler T. Comparative efficacies of pivmecillinam and ampicillin in acute shigellosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 May;25(5):643–645. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.5.643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Caekenberghe D. L., Pattyn S. R. In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin compared with those of other new fluorinated piperazinyl-substituted quinoline derivatives. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Apr;25(4):518–521. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.4.518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wise R., Andrews J. M., Edwards L. J. In vitro activity of Bay 09867, a new quinoline derivative, compared with those of other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Apr;23(4):559–564. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.4.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]