Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2003 Nov;88(6):F517–F520. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.6.F517

Multipoint measurement of intragastric pH in healthy preterm infants

T Omari, G Davidson
PMCID: PMC1763243  PMID: 14602702

Abstract

Background: The diagnostic use of 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring in infants is controversial because of the impact of feed buffering of gastric acidity.

Aim: To re-evaluate the effect of feeding on gastric pH and reflux using multipoint pH measurements.

Subjects: Fifteen healthy premature infants fed every four hours.

Methods: Oesophageal pH and intragastric pH at 3, 6, and 9 cm below the lower oesophageal sphincter were simultaneously measured using a four channel pH probe for four hours after bolus feeding. Parameters of pH were compared for the different levels within the stomach. During reflux episodes, the nadir pH was compared with intragastric pH at all levels.

Results: The proximal stomach was more significantly buffered by feeding and slower to re-acidify postprandially than the mid and distal stomach (42.2% of the time at pH < 4 compared with 58.7% and 55.7% respectively). During 27 of 62 gastro-oesophageal reflux episodes, nadir oesophageal pH was lower than the pH of the proximal stomach but always equal to or higher than the pH of the distal stomach.

Conclusions: These data indicate that previous studies may have overestimated the effect of feeding on gastric acidity and reflux.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (252.6 KB).

Figure 1 .

Figure 1

Schematic of the pH probe in situ. Sensors were located 12 cm (E1), 6 cm (G1), 3 cm (G2), and 0 cm (G3) from the tip. With the probe correctly positioned, E1 was located 3 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS), and sensors G1, G2, and G3 were located 3, 6, and 9 cm below the LOS.

Figure 2 .

Figure 2

Median pH profiles recorded in the oesophagus and stomach at 3 cm (Gastric 1), 6 cm (Gastric 2), and 9 cm (Gastric 3) below the lower oesophageal sphincter in the 15 infants studied. Dotted lines represent the interquartile range.

Figure 3 .

Figure 3

Example tracing of intragastric pH recorded at the time of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR). Two reflux episodes are shown (shaded regions). During the first episode, oesophageal pH falls to a nadir that is lower than the pH recorded in the proximal stomach (G1) but greater than that in the mid and distal stomach (G2 and G3), suggesting that refluxate is originating from the mid and/or distal stomach. During the second reflux episode, expulsion of refluxate is followed by acidification of the proximal stomach indicating mixing of gastric contents.

Figure 4 .

Figure 4

Comparison of the mean basal and nadir pH during gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) episodes with regional intragastric pH. *Gastric pH significantly higher than nadir pH (***p < 0.005); †gastric pH significantly lower than nadir pH (†p < 0.05, ††p < 0.005, †††p < 0.0005).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnett C., Snel A., Omari T., Davidson G., Haslam R., Butler R. Reproducibility of the 13C-octanoic acid breath test for assessment of gastric emptying in healthy preterm infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999 Jul;29(1):26–30. doi: 10.1097/00005176-199907000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grant L., Cochran D. Can pH monitoring reliably detect gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm infants? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001 Nov;85(3):F155–F158. doi: 10.1136/fn.85.3.F155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hegar B., Vandemaele K., Arana A., Vandenplas Y. Oesophageal pH monitoring in infants: elimination of gastric buffering does not modify reflux index. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 Aug;15(8):902–905. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Katzka D. A., Gideon R. M., Castell D. O. Normal patterns of acid exposure at the gastric cardia: a functional midpoint between the esophagus and stomach. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Aug;93(8):1236–1242. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00402.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mitchell D. J., McClure B. G., Tubman T. R. Simultaneous monitoring of gastric and oesophageal pH reveals limitations of conventional oesophageal pH monitoring in milk fed infants. Arch Dis Child. 2001 Mar;84(3):273–276. doi: 10.1136/adc.84.3.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Omari T. I., Benninga M. A., Haslam R. R., Barnett C. P., Davidson G. P., Dent J. Lower esophageal sphincter position in premature infants cannot be correctly estimated with current formulas. J Pediatr. 1999 Oct;135(4):522–525. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70179-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Washington N., Spensley P. J., Smith C. A., Parker M., Bush D., Jackson S. J., Kapila L., Stephenson T., Washington C. Dual pH probe monitoring versus single pH probe monitoring in infants on milk feeds: the impact on diagnosis. Arch Dis Child. 1999 Oct;81(4):309–312. doi: 10.1136/adc.81.4.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES