Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2001 Nov;55(11):782–788. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.11.782

Effects of screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in New South Wales implied by influences of period of diagnosis and birth cohort

R Taylor 1, S Morrell 1, H Mamoon 1, G Wain 1
PMCID: PMC1763307  PMID: 11604432

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES—Cervical cancer incidence and mortality in NSW during 1972-1996 is examined under counterfactual assumptions to estimate the number of new cervical cancer cases averted and deaths avoided, with projections to 2006.
SETTING—Cervical cancer incident cases and deaths in NSW for 1972-96 were obtained from the NSW Central Cancer Registry, Sydney, Australia.
DESIGN—Data were analysed by age-period-cohort (APC) modelling, using Poisson regression. Projection of incidence to 2006 was based on a linear trend for period effects. A counterfactual scenario was constructed assuming stable period effects (1972-74), but modelled cohort effects. Modelled rates were converted to cases and deaths (using mortality:incidence ratios for cervical cancer), and compared with actual data to estimate cancers prevented and deaths averted due to screening.
RESULTS—Rising cohort effects with recency of birth were found after controlling for age and period of diagnosis, and declining period effects were identified after controlling for age and birth cohort. The estimated cumulated number of new cases of cervical cancer prevented during 1972-1996 was 3440. The cumulated number of averted deaths over 1972-1996, derived from incident cases, was estimated to be 1610 (including actual declines in the M/I ratio). With no change in the M/I ratio from 1972, estimated cumulated mortality averted due to cervical cancer for 1972-1996 was 1210 deaths.
CONCLUSIONS—Cervical screening has prevented a substantial number of new cases of cervical cancer and deaths. In addition, secondary prevention and improved treatment has contributed further to cervical cancer deaths averted.


Keywords: cervical cancer; age-period-cohort modelling; mortality

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (154.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aareleid T., Pukkala E., Thomson H., Hakama M. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality trends in Finland and Estonia: a screened vs. an unscreened population. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(5):745–749. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80359-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adami H. O., Bergström R., Sparén P., Baron J. Increasing cancer risk in younger birth cohorts in Sweden. Lancet. 1993 Mar 27;341(8848):773–777. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90557-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adami H. O., Pontén J., Sparén P., Bergström R., Gustafsson L., Friberg L. G. Survival trend after invasive cervical cancer diagnosis in Sweden before and after cytologic screening. 1960-1984. Cancer. 1994 Jan 1;73(1):140–147. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940101)73:1<140::aid-cncr2820730124>3.0.co;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenner H., Ziegler H. Monitoring and projecting cancer incidence in Saarland, Germany, based on age-cohort analyses. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Feb;46(1):15–20. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clayton D., Schifflers E. Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. I: Age-period and age-cohort models. Stat Med. 1987 Jun;6(4):449–467. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clayton D., Schifflers E. Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. II: Age-period-cohort models. Stat Med. 1987 Jun;6(4):469–481. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cox B., Skegg D. C. Projections of cervical cancer mortality and incidence in New Zealand: the possible impact of screening. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Aug;46(4):373–377. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.4.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dubrow R., Bernstein J., Holford T. R. Age-period-cohort modelling of large-bowel-cancer incidence by anatomic sub-site and sex in Connecticut. Int J Cancer. 1993 Apr 1;53(6):907–913. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910530607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eddy D. M. The frequency of cervical cancer screening. Comparison of a mathematical model with empirical data. Cancer. 1987 Sep 1;60(5):1117–1122. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870901)60:5<1117::aid-cncr2820600533>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gardner M. J., Osmond C. Interpretation of time trends in disease rates in the presence of generation effects. Stat Med. 1984 Apr-Jun;3(2):113–130. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780030205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gibson L., Spiegelhalter D. J., Camilleri-Ferrante C., Day N. E. Trends in invasive cervical cancer incidence in East Anglia from 1971 to 1993. J Med Screen. 1997;4(1):44–48. doi: 10.1177/096914139700400113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hakama M., Louhivuori K. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked. Cancer Surv. 1988;7(3):403–416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Holford T. R. Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates. Annu Rev Public Health. 1991;12:425–457. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.002233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johannesson G., Geirsson G., Day N. The effect of mass screening in Iceland, 1965-74, on the incidence and mortality of cervical carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1978 Apr 15;21(4):418–425. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910210404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Johannesson G., Geirsson G., Day N., Tulinius H. Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Iceland 1965--1978. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;61(3):199–203. doi: 10.3109/00016348209156556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lără E., Day N. E., Hakama M. Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes. Lancet. 1987 May 30;1(8544):1247–1249. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92695-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McCredie M., Coates M. S., Ford J. M. Trends in invasive cancer of the cervix uteri in New South Wales, 1973-1982. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Aug;29(3 Pt 2):335–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1989.tb01758.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Melnikow J., Nuovo J., Willan A. R., Chan B. K., Howell L. P. Natural history of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Oct;92(4 Pt 2):727–735. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00245-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Osmond C., Gardner M. J. Age, period and cohort models applied to cancer mortality rates. Stat Med. 1982 Jul-Sep;1(3):245–259. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780010306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Parkin D. M., Nguyen-Dinh X., Day N. E. The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Feb;92(2):150–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Persson I., Bergström R., Sparén P., Thörn M., Adami H. O. Trends in breast cancer incidence in Sweden 1958-1988 by time period and birth cohort. Br J Cancer. 1993 Dec;68(6):1247–1253. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sasieni P., Adams J. Effect of screening on cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales: analysis of trends with an age period cohort model. BMJ. 1999 May 8;318(7193):1244–1245. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sherlaw-Johnson C., Gallivan S., Jenkins D. Withdrawing low risk women from cervical screening programmes: mathematical modelling study. BMJ. 1999 Feb 6;318(7180):356–360. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7180.356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sherman P. A., Burigo J. A. Comparison of laparoscopic Falope-Ring and minilaparotomy sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jan;63(1):71–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sigurdsson K., Adalsteinsson S., Ragnarsson J. Trends in cervical and breast cancer in Iceland. A statistical evaluation of trends in incidence and mortality for the period 1955-1989, their relation to screening and prediction to the year 2000. Int J Cancer. 1991 Jun 19;48(4):523–528. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910480408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sigurdsson K. Effect of organized screening on the risk of cervical cancer. Evaluation of screening activity in Iceland, 1964-1991. Int J Cancer. 1993 Jun 19;54(4):563–570. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910540408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sigurdsson K., Hrafnkelsson J., Geirsson G., Gudmundsson J., Salvarsdóttir A. Screening as a prognostic factor in cervical cancer: analysis of survival and prognostic factors based on Icelandic population data, 1964-1988. Gynecol Oncol. 1991 Oct;43(1):64–70. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(91)90011-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sigurdsson K. The Icelandic and Nordic cervical screening programs: trends in incidence and mortality rates through 1995. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999 Jul;78(6):478–485. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Taylor R., Bell J., Coates M., Churches T., Wain G. Cervical cancer in New South Wales women: five-year survival, 1972 to 1991. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1996 Aug;20(4):413–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1996.tb01055.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Taylor R., Comino E., Bauman A. Asthma mortality in Australia 1920-94: age, period, and cohort effects. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Aug;51(4):408–411. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.4.408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang P. D., Lin R. S. Age-period-cohort analysis of cervical cancer mortality in Taiwan, 1974-1992. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997 Aug;76(7):697–702. doi: 10.3109/00016349709024613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zheng T., Mayne S. T., Holford T. R., Boyle P., Liu W., Chen Y., Mador M., Flannery J. The time trend and age-period-cohort effects on incidence of adenocarcinoma of the stomach in Connecticut from 1955-1989. Cancer. 1993 Jul 15;72(2):330–340. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930715)72:2<330::aid-cncr2820720205>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zheng T., Mayne S. T., Holford T. R., Boyle P., Liu W., Chen Y., Mador M., Flannery J. Time trend and age-period-cohort effects on incidence of esophageal cancer in Connecticut, 1935-89. Cancer Causes Control. 1992 Sep;3(5):481–492. doi: 10.1007/BF00051361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES