Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2001 Nov;55(11):791–798. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.11.791

Diastolic blood pressure and area of residence: multilevel versus ecological analysis of social inequity

J Merlo 1, P Ostergren 1, O Hagberg 1, M Lindstrom 1, A Lindgren 1, A Melander 1, L Rastam 1, G Berglund 1
PMCID: PMC1763308  PMID: 11604434

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES—To study geographical differences in diastolic blood pressure and the influence of the social environment (census percentage of people with low educational achievement) on individual diastolic blood pressure level, after controlling for individual age and educational achievement. To compare the results of multilevel and ecological analyses.
DESIGN—Cross sectional analysis performed by multilevel linear regression modelling, with women at the first level and urban areas at the second level, and by single level ecological regression using areas as the unit of analysis.
SETTING—Malmö, Sweden (population 250 000).
PARTICIPANTS—15 569 women aged 45 to 73, residing in 17 urban areas, who took part in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (1991-1996).
MAIN RESULTS—In the "fixed effects" multilevel analysis, low educational achievement at both individual (β=1.093, SE=0.167) and area levels (β=2.966, SE=1.250) were independently associated with blood pressure, although in the "random effects" multilevel analysis almost none of the total variability in blood pressure across persons was attributable to areas (intraclass correlation=0.3%). The ecological analysis also found an association between the area educational variable and mean diastolic blood pressure (β=4.058, SE=1.345).
CONCLUSIONS—The small intraclass correlation found indicated very marginal geographical differences and almost no influence of the urban area on individual blood pressure. However, these slight differences were enough to detect an effect of the social environment on blood pressure. The ecological study overestimated the associations found in the "fixed" effects multilevel analysis, and neither distinguished individual from area levels nor provided information on the intraclass correlation. Ecological analyses are inadequate to evaluate geographical differences in health.


Keywords: variance analysis; ecological bias; blood pressure

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (236.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berglund G., Elmstähl S., Janzon L., Larsson S. A. The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Design and feasibility. J Intern Med. 1993 Jan;233(1):45–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1993.tb00647.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blakely T. A., Woodward A. J. Ecological effects in multi-level studies. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 May;54(5):367–374. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.5.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyle M. H., Willms J. D. Place effects for areas defined by administrative boundaries. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Mar 15;149(6):577–585. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruce N. G., Cook D. G., Shaper A. G., Thomson A. G. Geographical variations in blood pressure in British men and women. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(4):385–398. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90124-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruce N. G., Wannamethee G., Shaper A. G. Lifestyle factors associated with geographic blood pressure variations among men and women in the UK. J Hum Hypertens. 1993 Jun;7(3):229–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Diez-Roux A. V. Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health. 1998 Feb;88(2):216–222. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.2.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Diez-Roux A. V., Link B. G., Northridge M. E. A multilevel analysis of income inequality and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Mar;50(5):673–687. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00320-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Diez-Roux A. V. Multilevel analysis in public health research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:171–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Diez-Roux A. V., Nieto F. J., Muntaner C., Tyroler H. A., Comstock G. W., Shahar E., Cooper L. S., Watson R. L., Szklo M. Neighborhood environments and coronary heart disease: a multilevel analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Jul 1;146(1):48–63. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Duncan C., Jones K., Moon G. Do places matter? A multi-level analysis of regional variations in health-related behaviour in Britain. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Sep;37(6):725–733. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90366-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Duncan C., Jones K., Moon G. Psychiatric morbidity: a multilevel approach to regional variations in the UK. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Jun;49(3):290–295. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.3.290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Duncan C., Jones K., Moon G. Smoking and deprivation: are there neighbourhood effects? Soc Sci Med. 1999 Feb;48(4):497–505. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00360-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Elford J., Phillips A., Thomson A. G., Shaper A. G. Migration and geographic variations in blood pressure in Britain. BMJ. 1990 Feb 3;300(6720):291–295. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6720.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Engström G., Berglund G., Göransson M., Hansen O., Hedblad B., Merlo J., Tydén P., Janzon L. Distribution and determinants of ischaemic heart disease in an urban population. A study from the myocardial infarction register in Malmö, Sweden. J Intern Med. 2000 May;247(5):588–596. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00663.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gulliford M. C., Ukoumunne O. C., Chinn S. Components of variance and intraclass correlations for the design of community-based surveys and intervention studies: data from the Health Survey for England 1994. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 May 1;149(9):876–883. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kleinschmidt I., Hills M., Elliott P. Smoking behaviour can be predicted by neighbourhood deprivation measures. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Dec;49 (Suppl 2):S72–S77. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.suppl_2.s72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Merlo J., Ostergren P. O., Broms K., Bjorck-Linné A., Liedholm H. Survival after initial hospitalisation for heart failure: a multilevel analysis of patients in Swedish acute care hospitals. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 May;55(5):323–329. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.5.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pickett K. E., Pearl M. Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Feb;55(2):111–122. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.2.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Reijneveld S. A. The impact of individual and area characteristics on urban socioeconomic differences in health and smoking. Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Feb;27(1):33–40. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sundquist J., Malmström M., Johansson S. E. Cardiovascular risk factors and the neighbourhood environment: a multilevel analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;28(5):841–845. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.5.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES