Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2001 Nov;55(11):799–803. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.11.799

Misconceptions about efficacy of mammography screening: a public health dilemma

E Chamot 1, T Perneger 1
PMCID: PMC1763315  PMID: 11604435

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—This study assessed accuracy of women's opinions about reduction in mortality from breast cancer attributable to mammography screening.
DESIGN—Cross sectional survey.
SETTING—General population of Geneva, Switzerland.
PARTICIPANTS—895 randomly selected women aged 40 to 80 years, free of breast cancer.
RESULTS—Women estimated the proportion of deaths from breast cancer that regular mammography screening prevents in women over age 50. Only 19.3% of the respondents assessed screening efficacy realistically (that is, reduction by about one fourth); 52.0% overestimated efficacy; 26.0% "didn't know", and 2.6% stated that screening prevents no death. Women who believed mammography screening to be effective had more positive attitudes toward screening (higher scores of pros and lower scores of cons) and were more likely to plan to have a mammogram (both p<0.001). Lack of opinion about the benefit of mammography screening was more common among women who had not consulted a gynaecologist recently (p=0.02) nor had had a mammogram during the past two years (p=0.009), who had no opinion about their risk of breast cancer (p<0.001), and who were 70 to 80 years old (p=0.04). Compared with women who provided realistic estimates of screening efficacy, those who overestimated efficacy believed to be at higher risk of breast cancer than other women (p=0.04) and were more likely to be Swiss nationals (p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS—Most women overestimated and many were uninformed about the efficacy of mammography screening. Therefore, few women were able to take truly informed decisions about screening mammography.


Keywords: mammography screening; patient information; decision making

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (143.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baines C. J. Women and breast cancer: is it really possible for the public to be well informed? CMAJ. 1992 Jun 15;146(12):2147–2148. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barratt A., Cockburn J., Furnival C., McBride A., Mallon L. Perceived sensitivity of mammographic screening: women's views on test accuracy and financial compensation for missed cancers. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Nov;53(11):716–720. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.11.716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Black W. C., Nease R. F., Jr, Tosteson A. N. Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 May 17;87(10):720–731. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.10.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coulter A. Evidence based patient information. is important, so there needs to be a national strategy to ensure it. BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):225–226. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Foster P., Anderson C. M. Reaching targets in the national cervical screening programme: are current practices unethical? J Med Ethics. 1998 Jun;24(3):151–157. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.3.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gøtzsche P. C., Olsen O. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet. 2000 Jan 8;355(9198):129–134. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06065-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kerlikowske K., Ernster V. L. Women should be fully informed of the potential benefits and harms before screening mammography. West J Med. 2000 Nov;173(5):313–314. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.173.5.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kerlikowske K., Grady D., Rubin S. M., Sandrock C., Ernster V. L. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1995 Jan 11;273(2):149–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leon D. A. Failed or misleading adjustment for confounding. Lancet. 1993 Aug 21;342(8869):479–481. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91599-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lipkus I. M., Rimer B. K., Strigo T. S. Relationships among objective and subjective risk for breast cancer and mammography stages of change. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Dec;5(12):1005–1011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Malm H. M. Medical screening and the value of early detection. When unwarranted faith leads to unethical recommendations. Hastings Cent Rep. 1999 Jan-Feb;29(1):26–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nyström L., Rutqvist L. E., Wall S., Lindgren A., Lindqvist M., Rydén S., Andersson I., Bjurstam N., Fagerberg G., Frisell J. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 1993 Apr 17;341(8851):973–978. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91067-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pearlman D. N., Rakowski W., Clark M. A., Ehrich B., Rimer B. K., Goldstein M. G., Woolverton H., 3rd, Dube C. E. Why do women's attitudes toward mammography change over time? Implications for physician-patient communication. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997 Jun;6(6):451–457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pellissier J. M., Venta E. R. Introducing patient values into the decision making process for breast cancer screening. Women Health. 1996;24(4):47–67. doi: 10.1300/j013v24n04_03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Prochaska J. O., Velicer W. F., Rossi J. S., Goldstein M. G., Marcus B. H., Rakowski W., Fiore C., Harlow L. L., Redding C. A., Rosenbloom D. Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychol. 1994 Jan;13(1):39–46. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.13.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rakowski W., Andersen M. R., Stoddard A. M., Urban N., Rimer B. K., Lane D. S., Fox S. A., Costanza M. E. Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography. Health Psychol. 1997 Sep;16(5):433–441. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.16.5.433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rakowski W., Fulton J. P., Feldman J. P. Women's decision making about mammography: a replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychol. 1993 May;12(3):209–214. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.12.3.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schwartz L. M., Woloshin S., Sox H. C., Fischhoff B., Welch H. G. US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2000 Jun 17;320(7250):1635–1640. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7250.1635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Slaytor E. K., Ward J. E. How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets. BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):263–264. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stoddard A. M., Rimer B. K., Lane D., Fox S. A., Lipkus I., Luckmann R., Avrunin J. S., Sprachman S., Costanza M., Urban N. Underusers of mammogram screening: stage of adoption in five U.S. subpopulations. The NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Prev Med. 1998 May-Jun;27(3):478–487. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Törnberg S. A. Screening for early detection of cancer--ethical aspects. Acta Oncol. 1999;38(1):77–81. doi: 10.1080/028418699431834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ward J. Population-based mammographic screening: does 'informed choice' require any less than full disclosure to individuals of benefits, harms, limitations and consequences? Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999 Jun;23(3):301–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1999.tb01260.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wolf A. M., Becker D. M. Cancer screening and informed patient discussions. Truth and consequences. Arch Intern Med. 1996 May 27;156(10):1069–1072. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Woloshin S., Schwartz L. M., Byram S. J., Sox H. C., Fischhoff B., Welch H. G. Women's understanding of the mammography screening debate. Arch Intern Med. 2000 May 22;160(10):1434–1440. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.10.1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wright C. J., Mueller C. B. Screening mammography and public health policy: the need for perspective. Lancet. 1995 Jul 1;346(8966):29–32. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92655-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yanovitzky I., Blitz C. L. Effect of media coverage and physician advice on utilization of breast cancer screening by women 40 years and older. J Health Commun. 2000 Apr-Jun;5(2):117–134. doi: 10.1080/108107300406857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES