Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2004 Oct;58(10):877–882. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.017939

Development of the chronic fatigue syndrome in severely fatigued employees: predictors of outcome in the Maastricht cohort study

M Huibers 1, I Kant 1, J Knottnerus 1, G Bleijenberg 1, G Swaen 1, S Kasl 1
PMCID: PMC1763327  PMID: 15365116

Abstract

Study objective: To identify risk factors of the development of the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), the persistence or recurrence of fatigue, or recovery from fatigue in a large sample of fatigued employees.

Design: Analyses were based on the Maastricht cohort study (MCS), a prospective population based cohort study among more than 12 000 employees. Multiple regression models were used to identify predictors of CFS-like caseness (meeting research criteria for CFS), non-CFS fatigue caseness, or no fatigue caseness.

Setting: The working population in the Netherlands.

Participants: 1143 employees with medically unexplained fatigue were followed up prospectively for 44 months.

Main results: At 44 month follow up, 8% of the employees were CFS-like cases (none of who reported to have received a CFS diagnosis), 40% were non-CFS fatigue cases, and 52% were no longer fatigue cases. Factors that predicted CFS-like caseness compared with non-CFS fatigue caseness were high age, exhaustion, female sex, low education, and visits to the general practitioner. Factors that predicted CFS-like caseness compared with no fatigue caseness were fatigue, exhaustion, low education, visits to the GP and occupational physician, and bad self rated health. Factors that predicted non-CFS fatigue caseness compared with no fatigue caseness were fatigue, low self perceived activity, exhaustion, anxious mood, and bad self rated health.

Conclusions: Unexplained fatigue among employees in some instances is a precursor of the development of CFS. The prognostic role of self rated health suggests that prevention and treatment of chronic fatigue should be aimed at changing the perception of health or illness. Less clear is the role of health care seeking or receiving a CFS diagnosis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (82.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aaronson N. K., Muller M., Cohen P. D., Essink-Bot M. L., Fekkes M., Sanderman R., Sprangers M. A., te Velde A., Verrips E. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1055–1068. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00097-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Afari Niloofar, Buchwald Dedra. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a review. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;160(2):221–236. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.2.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beurskens A. J., Bültmann U., Kant I., Vercoulen J. H., Bleijenberg G., Swaen G. M. Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure. Occup Environ Med. 2000 May;57(5):353–357. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.5.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bombardier C. H., Buchwald D. Outcome and prognosis of patients with chronic fatigue vs chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Oct 23;155(19):2105–2110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bültmann Ute, Kant Ijmert, Kasl Stanislav V., Beurskens Anna J. H. M., van den Brandt Piet A. Fatigue and psychological distress in the working population: psychometrics, prevalence, and correlates. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Jun;52(6):445–452. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00228-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chalder T., Godfrey E., Ridsdale L., King M., Wessely S. Predictors of outcome in a fatigued population in primary care following a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2003 Feb;33(2):283–287. doi: 10.1017/s0033291702007006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fukuda K., Straus S. E., Hickie I., Sharpe M. C., Dobbins J. G., Komaroff A. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Dec 15;121(12):953–959. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-12-199412150-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamilton W. T., Hall G. H., Round A. P. Frequency of attendance in general practice and symptoms before development of chronic fatigue syndrome: a case-control study. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jul;51(468):553–558. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huibers M. J. H., Beurskens A. J. H. M., Prins J. B., Kant I. J., Bazelmans E., Van Schayck C. P., Knottnerus J. A., Bleijenberg G. Fatigue, burnout, and chronic fatigue syndrome among employees on sick leave: do attributions make the difference? Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 (Suppl 1):i26–i31. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jansen Nicole W. H., Kant I. Jmert, van den Brandt Piet A. Need for recovery in the working population: description and associations with fatigue and psychological distress. Int J Behav Med. 2002;9(4):322–340. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0904_03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Janssen N., Kant I. J., Swaen G. M. H., Janssen P. P. M., Schröer C. A. P. Fatigue as a predictor of sickness absence: results from the Maastricht cohort study on fatigue at work. Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 (Suppl 1):i71–i76. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kant I. J., Bültmann U., Schröer K. A. P., Beurskens A. J. H. M., Van Amelsvoort L. G. P. M., Swaen G. M. H. An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: the Maastricht Cohort Study. Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 (Suppl 1):i32–i39. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lewis G., Wessely S. The epidemiology of fatigue: more questions than answers. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Apr;46(2):92–97. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.2.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peterson P. K., Schenck C. H., Sherman R. Chronic fatigue syndrome in Minnesota. Minn Med. 1991 May;74(5):21–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Prins J. B., Bleijenberg G., Bazelmans E., Elving L. D., de Boo T. M., Severens J. L., van der Wilt G. J., Spinhoven P., van der Meer J. W. Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001 Mar 17;357(9259):841–847. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04198-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Skapinakis P., Lewis G., Mavreas V. One-year outcome of unexplained fatigue syndromes in primary care: results from an international study. Psychol Med. 2003 Jul;33(5):857–866. doi: 10.1017/s0033291703007566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sluiter J. K., van der Beek A. J., Frings-Dresen M. H. The influence of work characteristics on the need for recovery and experienced health: a study on coach drivers. Ergonomics. 1999 Apr;42(4):573–583. doi: 10.1080/001401399185487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Taylor R. R., Jason L. A., Torres A. Fatigue rating scales: an empirical comparison. Psychol Med. 2000 Jul;30(4):849–856. doi: 10.1017/s0033291799002500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taylor Renee R., Jason Leonard A., Curie Carrie J. Prognosis of chronic fatigue in a community-based sample. Psychosom Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;64(2):319–327. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200203000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tirelli U., Marotta G., Improta S., Pinto A. Immunological abnormalities in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Scand J Immunol. 1994 Dec;40(6):601–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1994.tb03511.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vercoulen J. H., Swanink C. M., Fennis J. F., Galama J. M., van der Meer J. W., Bleijenberg G. Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jul;38(5):383–392. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90099-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Vercoulen J. H., Swanink C. M., Fennis J. F., Galama J. M., van der Meer J. W., Bleijenberg G. Prognosis in chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective study on the natural course. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 May;60(5):489–494. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.60.5.489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ware J. E., Jr, Sherbourne C. D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wessely S., Chalder T., Hirsch S., Pawlikowska T., Wallace P., Wright D. J. Postinfectious fatigue: prospective cohort study in primary care. Lancet. 1995 May 27;345(8961):1333–1338. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92537-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Whiting P., Bagnall A. M., Sowden A. J., Cornell J. E., Mulrow C. D., Ramírez G. Interventions for the treatment and management of chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review. JAMA. 2001 Sep 19;286(11):1360–1368. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.11.1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wilson A., Hickie I., Lloyd A., Hadzi-Pavlovic D., Boughton C., Dwyer J., Wakefield D. Longitudinal study of outcome of chronic fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1994 Mar 19;308(6931):756–759. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6931.756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. van Amelsvoort L. G. P. M., Kant I. J., Beurskens A. J. H. M., Schröer C. A. P., Swaen G. M. H. Fatigue as a predictor of work disability. Occup Environ Med. 2002 Oct;59(10):712–713. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.10.712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. van der Werf Sieberen P., de Vree Berna, Alberts Maurice, van der Meer Jos W. M., Bleijenberg Gijs, Netherlands Fatigue Research Group Nijmegen Natural course and predicting self-reported improvement in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome with a relatively short illness duration. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Sep;53(3):749–753. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00324-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES