Abstract
Study objective: To assess the secondary health impacts of a traffic calming scheme on a community.
Methods: Prospective cohort study of a randomly selected sample of the local community using postal questionnaires and pedestrian counts on the affected road six months before and six months after the implementation of the scheme. The setting was a community in which a traffic calming scheme was built in the main road (2587 households). The Short Form 36 version 2 was included in the questionnaire and summary measures of physical health (physical component summary) and mental health (mental component summary) calculated. A random sample of 750 households was initially posted the pre-intervention questionnaire.
Main results: There were increases in observed pedestrian activity in the area after the introduction of the traffic calming scheme. Physical health improved significantly but mental health did not change. Traffic related problems improved, while other local nuisances were reported to be worse.
Conclusions: The introduction of a traffic calming scheme is associated with improvements in health and health related behaviours. It is feasible to prospectively evaluate broader health impacts of similar transport interventions although poor response rates may limit the validity of results.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (66.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ellaway A., Macintyre S. Social capital and self-rated health: support for a contextual mechanism. Am J Public Health. 2000 Jun;90(6):988–988. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.6.988a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elvik R. Area-wide urban traffic calming schemes: a meta-analysis of safety effects. Accid Anal Prev. 2001 May;33(3):327–336. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00046-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenkinson C., Stewart-Brown S., Petersen S., Paice C. Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Jan;53(1):46–50. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.1.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrison D. S., Petticrew M., Thomson H. What are the most effective ways of improving population health through transport interventions? Evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 May;57(5):327–333. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.5.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrison D. S., Petticrew M., Thomson H. What are the most effective ways of improving population health through transport interventions? Evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 May;57(5):327–333. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.5.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parry J., Stevens A. Prospective health impact assessment: pitfalls, problems, and possible ways forward. BMJ. 2001 Nov 17;323(7322):1177–1182. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pickett K. E., Pearl M. Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Feb;55(2):111–122. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.2.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]