Abstract
Study objective: To garner research leaders' perceptions and experiences of the types of evidence that influence policy on health inequalities, and their reflections on how the flow of such research evidence could be increased.
Design, setting, and participants: Qualitative two day residential workshop with senior research leaders, most of whom were currently involved in evaluations of the health effects of major policies. In four in depth sessions, facilitated by the authors in turn, focused questions were presented to participants to reveal their views and experiences concerning evidence synthesis for policy on inequalities. These were analysed thematically.
Main results: Five types of evidence for policy on health inequalities were felt to be particularly persuasive with policymakers: observational evidence showing the existing of a problem; narrative accounts of the impacts of policies from the household perspective; controlled evaluations; natural policy experiments; and historical evidence. Methods of improving the availability and use of these sources of information were put forward.
Conclusions: This paper and its companion have considered the current evidence base for policies to reduce health inequalities, and how this could be improved. There is striking congruence between the views of the researchers in this study and policy advisers in paper 1, suggesting that a common understanding may be emerging. The findings suggest significant potential for rapid progress to be made in developing both evidence based policy, and policy relevant evidence to tackle inequalities in health.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (65.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Darby S., Whitley E., Silcocks P., Thakrar B., Green M., Lomas P., Miles J., Reeves G., Fearn T., Doll R. Risk of lung cancer associated with residential radon exposure in south-west England: a case-control study. Br J Cancer. 1998 Aug;78(3):394–408. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denman A. R., Phillips P. S. A review of the cost effectiveness of radon mitigation in domestic properties in Northamptonshire. J Radiol Prot. 1998 Jun;18(2):119–124. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/18/2/007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hahn S., Kim Y., Garner P. Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution for treating dehydration due to diarrhoea in children: systematic review. BMJ. 2001 Jul 14;323(7304):81–85. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Howden-Chapman P., Carter J., Woods N. Blood money: blood donors' attitudes to changes in the New Zealand blood transfusion service. BMJ. 1996 May 4;312(7039):1131–1132. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7039.1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petticrew Mark, Whitehead Margaret, Macintyre Sally J., Graham Hilary, Egan Matt. Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 1: the reality according to policymakers. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Oct;58(10):811–816. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.015289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Platt S., Kreitman N. Trends in parasuicide and unemployment among men in Edinburgh, 1968-82. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Oct 20;289(6451):1029–1032. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6451.1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]