Abstract
Aims: To estimate the prevalence of passive smoking at work in the whole workforce in Hong Kong (population 6.8 million), the characteristics of the passive smokers, any extra use of health care among passive smokers, and who pays for that health care.
Methods: A random sample of 14 325 households was contacted by telephone; 6186 responding adults who worked full time were asked about their employment, their most recent use of health care and the cost of that care, their medical benefits, and their exposure to secondhand smoke in the workplace. After weighting the sample for sex, age, household size, and income, 4739 subjects were included in the analysis.
Results: Of 1961 full time workers who did not smoke, 47.5% were exposed to secondhand smoke in the workplace compared with only 26% exposed at home. Exposure at work was associated with being younger, male, married, less educated, and having a lower income. Those exposed at work were 37% more likely to report having visited a doctor for a respiratory illness in the previous 14 days. Employers were paying 28% of the cost of these visits, the government paid 8%, and the individuals paid 63%. If extrapolated to the 3 million workers in the Hong Kong population, employers would pay just over US$9 million per year, while the affected workers would pay around US$20 million.
Conclusion: As well as the costs of active smoking, the cost of extra health care utilisation associated with passive smoking is an additional cost being paid by those employers who have not established smoke free workplaces and by their employees.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (151.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Hammond S. K. Exposure of U.S. workers to environmental tobacco smoke. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 May;107 (Suppl 2):329–340. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107s2329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kauppinen T., Toikkanen J., Pedersen D., Young R., Ahrens W., Boffetta P., Hansen J., Kromhout H., Maqueda Blasco J., Mirabelli D. Occupational exposure to carcinogens in the European Union. Occup Environ Med. 2000 Jan;57(1):10–18. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kristein M. M. How much can business expect to profit from smoking cessation? Prev Med. 1983 Mar;12(2):358–381. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(83)90245-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lam T. H., Ho L. M., Hedley A. J., Adab P., Fielding R., McGhee S. M., Aharonson-Daniel L. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure among police officers in Hong Kong. JAMA. 2000 Aug 9;284(6):756–763. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.6.756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mannino D. M., Siegel M., Rose D., Nkuchia J., Etzel R. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure in the home and worksite and health effects in adults: results from the 1991 National Health Interview Survey. Tob Control. 1997 Winter;6(4):296–305. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.4.296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGhee S. M., Adab P., Hedley A. J., Lam T. H., Ho L. M., Fielding R., Wong C. M. Passive smoking at work: the short-term cost. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Sep;54(9):673–676. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.9.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pirkle J. L., Flegal K. M., Bernert J. T., Brody D. J., Etzel R. A., Maurer K. R. Exposure of the US population to environmental tobacco smoke: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988 to 1991. JAMA. 1996 Apr 24;275(16):1233–1240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wells A. J. Heart disease from passive smoking in the workplace. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Jan;31(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00432-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White J. R., Froeb H. F., Kulik J. A. Respiratory illness in nonsmokers chronically exposed to tobacco smoke in the work place. Chest. 1991 Jul;100(1):39–43. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitlock G., MacMahon S., Vander Hoorn S., Davis P., Jackson R., Norton R. Association of environmental tobacco smoke exposure with socioeconomic status in a population of 7725 New Zealanders. Tob Control. 1998 Autumn;7(3):276–280. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.3.276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]