Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2002 Dec;59(12):830–835. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.12.830

Respiratory symptoms and diseases among workers in the soft tissue producing industry

T Kraus 1, A Pfahlberg 1, O Gefeller 1, H Raithel 1
PMCID: PMC1763608  PMID: 12468750

Abstract

Aims: To correlate the prevalence of respiratory tract symptoms and diseases with dust and fibre exposure in the soft tissue industry in Germany.

Methods: Ambient monitoring was performed for inhalable, respirable dust and fibres in seven soft tissue producing factories. In 441 workers (72 controls, 90 moderate, 279 high exposure) a standardised questionnaire on respiratory symptoms, diseases, occupational history, and smoking habits was used. Crude differences in the prevalence of respiratory symptoms and diseases were assessed. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relation between the respiratory symptoms/diseases and the cumulative dust and fibre exposure, respectively, while adjusting for age, gender, smoking habits, and factory. The effects of exposure intensity and duration were differentiated by categorising dust/fibre concentrations and years of exposure separately and setting up logistic regression models.

Results: The mean concentrations for inhalable, respirable, and fibrous dusts were 10.3 mg/m3, 0.22 mg/m3, and 415 000 fibres/m3. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) with relation to cumulative dust exposure intensity were significantly raised for blocked nose (18.2), mucosal irritation (6.5), dry nose (8.9), cough (3.5), phlegm (7.5), exercise induced dyspnoea (2.6), hoarseness (11.3), and sneezing attacks (7.9) (ORs for highest exposure categories). Cumulative dust or fibre exposure had no significant effects on the prevalence of respiratory diseases. For all symptoms with significantly raised ORs, combined effects of intensity and duration of exposure were found.

Conclusions: Because of the high prevalence of respiratory symptoms a reduction of dust exposures is recommended. Chronic exposure effects could not be found in this study, however, a healthy worker effect has to be considered.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (161.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahman M., Holmström M., Kolmodin-Hedman B., Thelin A. Nasal symptoms and pathophysiology in farmers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2001 May;74(4):279–284. doi: 10.1007/pl00007944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bünger J., Antlauf-Lammers M., Schulz T. G., Westphal G. A., Müller M. M., Ruhnau P., Hallier E. Health complaints and immunological markers of exposure to bioaerosols among biowaste collectors and compost workers. Occup Environ Med. 2000 Jul;57(7):458–464. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.7.458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Douwes J., McLean D., van der Maarl E., Heederik D., Pearce N. Worker exposures to airborne dust, endotoxin and beta(1,3)-glucan in two New Zealand sawmills. Am J Ind Med. 2000 Oct;38(4):426–430. doi: 10.1002/1097-0274(200010)38:4<426::aid-ajim8>3.0.co;2-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ericsson J., Järvholm B., Norin F. Respiratory symptoms and lung function following exposure in workers exposed to soft paper tissue dust. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1988;60(5):341–345. doi: 10.1007/BF00405667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Järvholm B., Thorén K., Brolin I., Ericsson J., Morgan U., Tylen U., Bake B. Lung function in workers exposed to soft paper dust. Am J Ind Med. 1988;14(4):457–464. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700140409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kauppinen T., Teschke K., Savela A., Kogevinas M., Boffetta P. International data base of exposure measurements in the pulp, paper and paper product industries. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1997;70(2):119–127. doi: 10.1007/s004200050195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Milton D. K., Godleski J. J., Feldman H. A., Greaves I. A. Toxicity of intratracheally instilled cotton dust, cellulose, and endotoxin. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Jul;142(1):184–192. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/142.1.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rylander R., Thorn J., Attefors R. Airways inflammation among workers in a paper industry. Eur Respir J. 1999 May;13(5):1151–1157. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13e35.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Thorén K., Sällsten G., Bake B., Drake U., Järvholm B., Sahle W. Lung function and respiratory symptoms among workers in a soft paper mill. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1989;61(7):467–471. doi: 10.1007/BF00386481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Torén K., Järvholm B., Sällsten G., Thiringer G. Respiratory symptoms and asthma among workers exposed to paper dust: a cohort study. Am J Ind Med. 1994 Oct;26(4):489–496. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700260406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tátrai E., Ungváry G. The aetiology of experimental fibrosing alveobronchiolitis induced in rats by paprika dust. Br J Ind Med. 1992 Jul;49(7):494–498. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zuskin E., Mustajbegovic J., Schachter E. N., Kanceljak B., Kern J., Macan J., Ebling Z. Respiratory function and immunological status in paper-recycling workers. J Occup Environ Med. 1998 Nov;40(11):986–993. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199811000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES