Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2002 Mar;59(3):189–195. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.3.189

Detection of workers sensitised to high molecular weight allergens: a diagnostic study in laboratory animal workers

E Meijer 1, D Grobbee 1, D Heederik 1
PMCID: PMC1763629  PMID: 11886950

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether results from questionnaires, exposure measurements, and laboratory tests, commonly used in occupational health practice, can predict the presence or absence of sensitisation in workers exposed to high molecular weight (HMW) allergens. The study aims to develop and validate a diagnostic rule to predict sensitisation in laboratory animal workers. The main reason for such research is efficiency.

Methods: Baseline data from 551 laboratory animal workers participating in an ongoing cohort study, bridging a period of 3 years, were used for diagnostic research. Data from 472 workers participating in the study during the first period were used to develop a prediction rule; these workers represented the derivation set. Data from 79 workers, participating during the second period, were used to evaluate the rule's performance—the validation set. Serum samples were analysed for specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies against common and laboratory animal allergens. Questionnaire items, exposure determinants, IgE serology, skin prick tests (SPTs), and lung function tests were analysed, corresponding to diagnostic investigation, in a multiple logistic regression model. The accuracy of the model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and by comparison of the predicted and observed prevalences.

Results: Asthmatic symptoms, (work related) allergic symptoms, sex, occupational exposure to rats, and a positive SPT to common allergens, showed the best performance in discriminating workers at high or at low risk of being sensitised.

Conclusion: High and low risk categories for work related sensitisation can be distinguished from simple questionnaire data and SPT results. The method can easily be applied in occupational medical practice and may markedly increase the efficiency of occupational health surveillance in laboratory animal workers as well as other workers exposed to HMW allergens.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (171.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aoyama K., Ueda A., Manda F., Matsushita T., Ueda T., Yamauchi C. Allergy to laboratory animals: an epidemiological study. Br J Ind Med. 1992 Jan;49(1):41–47. doi: 10.1136/oem.49.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balmes J. R. Surveillance for occupational asthma. Occup Med. 1991 Jan-Mar;6(1):101–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernstein D. I. Allergic reactions to workplace allergens. JAMA. 1997 Dec 10;278(22):1907–1913. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Botham P. A., Lamb C. T., Teasdale E. L., Bonner S. M., Tomenson J. A. Allergy to laboratory animals: a follow up study of its incidence and of the influence of atopy and pre-existing sensitisation on its development. Occup Environ Med. 1995 Feb;52(2):129–133. doi: 10.1136/oem.52.2.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Briatico-Vangosa G., Braun C. L., Cookman G., Hofmann T., Kimber I., Loveless S. E., Morrow T., Pauluhn J., Sorensen T., Niessen H. J. Respiratory allergy: hazard identification and risk assessment. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1994 Aug;23(2):145–158. doi: 10.1006/faat.1994.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doekes G., Douwes J., Wouters I., de Wind S., Houba R., Hollander A. Enzyme immunoassays for total and allergen specific IgE in population studies. Occup Environ Med. 1996 Jan;53(1):63–70. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.1.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hanley J. A., McNeil B. J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29–36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heederik D., Venables K. M., Malmberg P., Hollander A., Karlsson A. S., Renström A., Doekes G., Nieuwenhijsen M., Gordon S. Exposure-response relationships for work-related sensitization in workers exposed to rat urinary allergens: results from a pooled study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Apr;103(4):678–684. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70242-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Houba R., van Run P., Doekes G., Heederik D., Spithoven J. Airborne levels of alpha-amylase allergens in bakeries. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Mar;99(3):286–292. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70044-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Malo J. L., Ghezzo H., L'Archevêque J., Lagier F., Perrin B., Cartier A. Is the clinical history a satisfactory means of diagnosing occupational asthma? Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Mar;143(3):528–532. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/143.3.528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Moscato G., Godnic-Cvar J., Maestrelli P., Malo J. L., Burge P. S., Coifman R. Statement on self-monitoring of peak expiratory flows in the investigation of occupational asthma. Subcommittee on Occupational Allergy of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. American Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. European Respiratory Society. American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Eur Respir J. 1995 Sep;8(9):1605–1610. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Quanjer P. H., Tammeling G. J., Cotes J. E., Pedersen O. F., Peslin R., Yernault J. C. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl. 1993 Mar;16:5–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Quirce S., Contreras G., Dybuncio A., Chan-Yeung M. Peak expiratory flow monitoring is not a reliable method for establishing the diagnosis of occupational asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Sep;152(3):1100–1102. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.3.7663790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Siriruttanapruk S., Burge P. S. The impact of the COSHH regulations on workers with occupational asthma. Occup Med (Lond) 1997 Feb;47(2):101–104. doi: 10.1093/occmed/47.2.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Slovak A. J., Hill R. N. Does atopy have any predictive value for laboratory animal allergy? A comparison of different concepts of atopy. Br J Ind Med. 1987 Feb;44(2):129–132. doi: 10.1136/oem.44.2.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Venables K. M. Prevention of occupational asthma. Eur Respir J. 1994 Apr;7(4):768–778. doi: 10.1183/09031936.94.07040768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Venables K. M., Tee R. D., Hawkins E. R., Gordon D. J., Wale C. J., Farrer N. M., Lam T. H., Baxter P. J., Newman Taylor A. J. Laboratory animal allergy in a pharmaceutical company. Br J Ind Med. 1988 Oct;45(10):660–666. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.10.660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES