Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2004 Jun;61(6):482–487. doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.008342

Twin frequency and industrial pollution in different regions of Hesse, Germany

N Obi-Osius 1, B Misselwitz 1, W Karmaus 1, J Witten 1
PMCID: PMC1763650  PMID: 15150386

Abstract

Aims: To investigate whether twinning occurs more frequently in residents in the vicinity of a toxic waste incinerator (TWI).

Methods: Within a longitudinal environmental study that addressed child health second grade school children and their parents were recruited. The proportion of twinning in the TWI region was compared with two comparison areas. In a second confirmatory investigation, birth records for the years 1994–97 from the Hessian Perinatal Survey (HEPS) were accessed to determine whether the incidence of twinning was higher in regions around the TWI compared to adjacent reference areas.

Results: In the environmental study, 61.5% of the children and 95% of their mothers participated. In mothers, twinning was 5.3% in the TWI region compared to 1.6% and 2.3% in the comparison regions. The proportion of mothers with fertility assessment/treatment was 5.7%, 8.3%, and 0% respectively. The prevalence of twinning was not significantly higher (4.5%) in mothers with treatment compared to mothers without (3.7%). From the HEPS, data of 20 603 births was analysed. The incidence of twins was significantly higher in areas which surround the TWI and other industries (1.4–1.6 per 100 births) compared to births in reference areas (0.8 per 100).

Conclusions: Twinning rates may be associated with exposure to industrial pollution. Future environmental health studies that consider multiple births as an outcome are warranted. These should also investigate whether the incidence of monozygotic or dizygotic twinning may be associated with industrial pollution.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (179.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allsopp M., Costner P., Johnston P. Incineration and human health. State of knowledge of the impacts of waste incinerators on human health. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2001;8(2):141–145. doi: 10.1007/BF02987308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blondel Béatrice, Kogan Michael D., Alexander Greg R., Dattani Nirupa, Kramer Michael S., Macfarlane Alison, Wen Shi Wu. The impact of the increasing number of multiple births on the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight: an international study. Am J Public Health. 2002 Aug;92(8):1323–1330. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.8.1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bortolus R., Parazzini F., Chatenoud L., Benzi G., Bianchi M. M., Marini A. The epidemiology of multiple births. Hum Reprod Update. 1999 Mar-Apr;5(2):179–187. doi: 10.1093/humupd/5.2.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brucker-Davis F., Thayer K., Colborn T. Significant effects of mild endogenous hormonal changes in humans: considerations for low-dose testing. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Mar;109 (Suppl 1):21–26. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carpenter D. O., Shen Y., Nguyen T., Le L., Lininger L. L. Incidence of endocrine disease among residents of New York areas of concern. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Dec;109 (Suppl 6):845–851. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s6845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Corchia C., Mastroiacovo P., Lanni R., Mannazzu R., Currò V., Fabris C. What proportion of multiple births are due to ovulation induction? A register-based study in Italy. Am J Public Health. 1996 Jun;86(6):851–854. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.6.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Damstra Terri. Potential effects of certain persistent organic pollutants and endocrine disrupting chemicals on the health of children. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2002;40(4):457–465. doi: 10.1081/clt-120006748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elster N. Less is more: the risks of multiple births. The Institute for Science, Law, and Technology Working Group on Reproductive Technology. Fertil Steril. 2000 Oct;74(4):617–623. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00713-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Glinianaia S. V., Rankin J., Renwick M. Time trends in twin perinatal mortality in northern England, 1982-94. Northern Region Perinatal Mortality Survey Steering Group. Twin Res. 1998 Dec;1(4):189–195. doi: 10.1375/136905298320566159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heller G., Misselwitz B., Schmidt S. Early neonatal mortality, asphyxia related deaths, and timing of low risk births in Hesse, Germany, 1990-8: observational study. BMJ. 2000 Jul 29;321(7256):274–275. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7256.274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Imaizumi Y. Trends of twinning rates in ten countries, 1972-1996. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1997;46(4):209–218. doi: 10.1017/s0001566000000441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. James W. H. Secular changes in twinning rates in England and Wales. Ann Hum Biol. 1980 Sep-Oct;7(5):485–487. doi: 10.1080/03014468000004601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jones P. W. Twinning in human populations and in cattle exposed to air pollution from incinerators. Br J Ind Med. 1989 Mar;46(3):215–216. doi: 10.1136/oem.46.3.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kataki A., Kouvatsi A. Twinning in Greece. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1988;37(2):147–150. doi: 10.1017/s0001566000004062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Keith L. G., Oleszczuk J. J., Keith D. M. Multiple gestation: reflections on epidemiology, causes, and consequences. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2000 May-Jun;45(3):206–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Künzel W. The birth survey in Germany--education and quality control in perinatology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994 Mar 31;54(1):13–20. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(94)90075-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lambalk C. B., Schoemaker J. Hypothetical risks of twinning in the natural menstrual cycle. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 Dec;75(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(97)00189-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lloyd O. L., Lloyd M. M., Williams F. L., Lawson A. Twinning in human populations and in cattle exposed to air pollution from incinerators. Br J Ind Med. 1988 Aug;45(8):556–560. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.8.556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Montgomery G. W., Duffy D. L., Hall J., Kudo M., Martin N. G., Hsueh A. J. Mutations in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor and familial dizygotic twinning. Lancet. 2001 Mar 10;357(9258):773–774. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04164-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Murphy M. F., Hey K., Whiteman D., O'Donnell M., Willis B., Barlow D. Is the natural twinning rate now stable? J Biosoc Sci. 2000 Apr;32(2):279–281. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000002790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nylander P. P. The factors that influence twinning rates. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1981;30(3):189–202. doi: 10.1017/s0001566000007650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Platt M. J., Marshall A., Pharoah P. O. The effects of assisted reproduction on the trends and zygosity of multiple births in England and Wales 1974-99. Twin Res. 2001 Dec;4(6):417–421. doi: 10.1375/1369052012696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rydhstroem H. No obvious spatial clustering of twin births in Sweden between 1973 and 1990. Environ Res. 1998 Jan;76(1):27–31. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1997.3785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tong S., Short R. V. Dizygotic twinning as a measure of human fertility. Hum Reprod. 1998 Jan;13(1):95–98. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.1.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Westergaard T., Wohlfahrt J., Aaby P., Melbye M. Population based study of rates of multiple pregnancies in Denmark, 1980-94. BMJ. 1997 Mar 15;314(7083):775–779. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7083.775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES