Abstract
Objectives: To identify current levels of testing men for chlamydia and establish levels of knowledge relating to chlamydia infection among practice nurses in primary care in one north Wales local area health group (LHG) as part of a study to improve delivery of sexual health services in primary care.
Methods: Anonymous confidential self completed postal questionnaires were sent to 46 practice nurses employed at 22 GP practices within one north Wales LHG. On return of the questionnaires and analysis of the data using SPSS, semistructured interviews with seven practice nurses were undertaken.
Results: Responses were obtained from 33/46 (71.7%) practice nurses. The majority, 30 (90.9%), do not examine male genitalia and 18 (54.5%) have never tested male patients for chlamydia infection. 28 (84.8%) practice nurses do not consider contact tracing as part of their role.
Conclusions: Primary care has a pivotal part to play in reducing prevalence of chlamydia. The paucity of male testing for chlamydia and a lack of consistent uniform testing and contact tracing in primary care has implications for the prevalence and long term consequences of infection. There is scope to greatly increase male testing for chlamydia both for those presenting with signs and symptoms of infection and those asymptomatic. This cannot be achieved without both educational and financial support for practice nurses.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (56.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cassell J. A., Brook M. G., Mercer C. H., Murphy S., Johnson A. M. Treating sexually transmitted infections in primary care: a missed opportunity? Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Apr;79(2):134–136. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.2.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mehta S. D., Shahmanesh M., Zenilman J. M. Spending money to save money. Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Feb;79(1):4–6. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.1.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paavonen J. Is screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection cost effective? Genitourin Med. 1997 Apr;73(2):103–104. doi: 10.1136/sti.73.2.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pimenta J., Catchpole M., Gray M., Hopwood J., Randall S. Evidence based health policy report. Screening for genital chlamydial infection. BMJ. 2000 Sep 9;321(7261):629–631. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7261.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pimenta J., Fenton K. A. Recent trends in Chlamydia trachomatis in the United Kingdom and the potential for national screening. Euro Surveill. 2001 May;6(5):81–84. doi: 10.2807/esm.06.05.00209-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson A. J., Greenhouse P. Prevention of recurrent pelvic infection by contact tracing: a commonsense approach. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Sep;103(9):859–861. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09901.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simms I., Hurtig A-K, Rogers P. A., Hughes G., Fenton K. A. Surveillance of sexually transmitted infections in primary care. Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Jun;79(3):174–176. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.3.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]