Skip to main content
PMC home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 1998 Sep;7(3):276–280. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.3.276

Association of environmental tobacco smoke exposure with socioeconomic status in a population of 7725 New Zealanders

G Whitlock 1, S MacMahon 1, H Vander 1, P Davis 1, R Jackson 1, R Norton 1
PMCID: PMC1763892  PMID: 9825423

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To test the hypothesis that environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure is inversely associated with socioeconomic status.
DESIGN—Survey.
SETTING—General community, New Zealand.
PARTICIPANTS—7725 non-smoking adults (volunteer sample of a multi-industry workforce, n = 5564; and a random sample of urban electoral rolls, n = 2161), including 5408 males; mean age 45 years.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—ETS exposure was assessed as self-reported number of hours per week spent near someone who is smoking, and as prevalence of regular exposure to some ETS. Socioeconomic status was assessed as educational level, occupational status, and median neighbourhood household income.
RESULTS—Both measures of ETS exposure were steeply and inversely associated with all three indicators of socioeconomic status (all p<0.0001). Geometric mean ETS exposure ranged from 16 minutes per week among university-educated participants to 59 minutes per week in the second lowest occupational quintile (95% confidence intervals: 14-18 minutes per week and 54-66 minutes per week). The associations with occupational status and educational level were steeper than those with neighbourhood income. The socioeconomic gradients of ETS exposure were steeper among participants aged less than 35 years than among participants aged over 50 years, among men than women, and among Maori than Europeans.
CONCLUSIONS—In this study population, ETS exposure was inversely associated with socioeconomic status. Greater ETS exposure might therefore contribute to the higher risks of disease and death among low socioeconomic groups. These results provide a further rationale for targeting tobacco control measures to people in low socioeconomic groups.


Keywords: environmental tobacco smoke; socioeconomic status; population survey

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (100.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brownson R. C., Alavanja M. C., Hock E. T. Reliability of passive smoke exposure histories in a case-control study of lung cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;22(5):804–808. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.5.804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cook D. G., Whincup P. H., Jarvis M. J., Strachan D. P., Papacosta O., Bryant A. Passive exposure to tobacco smoke in children aged 5-7 years: individual, family, and community factors. BMJ. 1994 Feb 5;308(6925):384–389. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6925.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cress R. D., Holly E. A., Aston D. A., Ahn D. K., Kristiansen J. J. Characteristics of women nonsmokers exposed to passive smoke. Prev Med. 1994 Jan;23(1):40–47. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1994.1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cummings K. M., Markello S. J., Mahoney M., Bhargava A. K., McElroy P. D., Marshall J. R. Measurement of current exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Arch Environ Health. 1990 Mar-Apr;45(2):74–79. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1990.9935929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doll R., Peto R., Wheatley K., Gray R., Sutherland I. Mortality in relation to smoking: 40 years' observations on male British doctors. BMJ. 1994 Oct 8;309(6959):901–911. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6959.901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Emmons K. M., Abrams D. B., Marshall R., Marcus B. H., Kane M., Novotny T. E., Etzel R. A. An evaluation of the relationship between self-report and biochemical measures of environmental tobacco smoke exposure. Prev Med. 1994 Jan;23(1):35–39. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1994.1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Friedman G. D., Petitti D. B., Bawol R. D. Prevalence and correlates of passive smoking. Am J Public Health. 1983 Apr;73(4):401–405. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.4.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hole D. J., Gillis C. R., Chopra C., Hawthorne V. M. Passive smoking and cardiorespiratory health in a general population in the west of Scotland. BMJ. 1989 Aug 12;299(6696):423–427. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6696.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jaakkola N., Ruotsalainen R., Jaakkola J. J. What are the determinants of children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke at home? Scand J Soc Med. 1994 Jun;22(2):107–112. doi: 10.1177/140349489402200205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jarvis M. J., Strachan D. P., Feyerabend C. Determinants of passive smoking in children in Edinburgh, Scotland. Am J Public Health. 1992 Sep;82(9):1225–1229. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.9.1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kawachi I., Colditz G. A. Invited commentary: confounding, measurement error, and publication bias in studies of passive smoking. Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Nov 15;144(10):909–915. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Law M. R., Hackshaw A. K. Environmental tobacco smoke. Br Med Bull. 1996 Jan;52(1):22–34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MacMahon S., Norton R., Jackson R., Mackie M. J., Cheng A., Vander Hoorn S., Milne A., McCulloch A. Fletcher Challenge-University of Auckland Heart & Health Study: design and baseline findings. N Z Med J. 1995 Dec 8;108(1013):499–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Matanoski G., Kanchanaraksa S., Lantry D., Chang Y. Characteristics of nonsmoking women in NHANES I and NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study with exposure to spouses who smoke. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Jul 15;142(2):149–157. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pearce N., Marshall S., Borman B. Undiminished social class mortality differences in New Zealand men. N Z Med J. 1991 Apr 24;104(910):153–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pierce J. P., Fiore M. C., Novotny T. E., Hatziandreu E. J., Davis R. M. Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States. Educational differences are increasing. JAMA. 1989 Jan 6;261(1):56–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sandler D. P., Helsing K. J., Comstock G. W., Shore D. L. Factors associated with past household exposure to tobacco smoke. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Feb;129(2):380–387. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith G. D., Neaton J. D., Wentworth D., Stamler R., Stamler J. Socioeconomic differentials in mortality risk among men screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: I. White men. Am J Public Health. 1996 Apr;86(4):486–496. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.4.486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thornton A., Lee P., Fry J. Differences between smokers, ex-smokers, passive smokers and non-smokers. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Oct;47(10):1143–1162. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90101-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Whitlock G., MacMahon S., Vander Hoorn S., Davis P., Jackson R., Norton R. Socioeconomic distribution of smoking in a population of 10,529 New Zealanders. N Z Med J. 1997 Sep 12;110(1051):327–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES