Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To test the hypothesis that proposed amendments to the Occupational Safety and Health Act making all enclosed workplaces in Western Australia smoke free would result in a decrease in cigarette consumption by patrons at nightclubs, pubs, and restaurants without adversely affecting attendance. DESIGN—Cross sectional structured interview survey. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING—Patrons of several inner city pubs and nightclubs in Perth were interviewed while queuing for admission to these venues. OUTCOME MEASURES—Current social habits, smoking habits, and how these might be affected by the proposed regulations. Persons who did not smoke daily were classified as "social smokers." RESULTS—Half (50%) of the 374 patrons interviewed were male, 51% currently did not smoke at all, 34.3% smoked every day, and the remaining 15.7% smoked, but not every day. A clear majority (62.5%) of all 374 respondents anticipated no change to the frequency of their patronage of hospitality venues if smoke-free policies became mandatory. One in five (19.3%) indicated that they would go out more often, and 18.2% said they would go out less often. Half (52%) of daily smokers anticipated no change to their cigarette consumption, while 44.5% of daily smokers anticipated a reduction in consumption. A majority of social smokers (54%) predicted a reduction in their cigarette consumption, with 42% of these anticipating quitting. CONCLUSIONS—One in nine (11.5%) of smokers say that adoption of smoke-free policies would prompt them to quit smoking entirely without a significant decrease in attendance at pubs and nightclubs. There can be few other initiatives as simple, cheap, and popular that would achieve so much for public health. Keywords: smoke-free policies; smoking behaviour
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (101.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Biener L., Fitzgerald G. Smoky bars and restaurants: who avoids them and why? J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):74–78. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borland R., Owen N., Hill D., Schofield P. Predicting attempts and sustained cessation of smoking after the introduction of workplace smoking bans. Health Psychol. 1991;10(5):336–342. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.10.5.336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chapman S. Smoking in public places. BMJ. 1996 Apr 27;312(7038):1051–1052. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7038.1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glantz S. A., Smith L. R. The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants and bars on revenues: a follow-up. Am J Public Health. 1997 Oct;87(10):1687–1693. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.10.1687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill D. J., White V. M., Scollo M. M. Smoking behaviours of Australian adults in 1995: trends and concerns. Med J Aust. 1998 Mar 2;168(5):209–213. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb140132.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hyland A., Cummings K. M., Nauenberg E. Analysis of taxable sales receipts: was New York City's Smoke-Free Air Act bad for restaurant business? J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):14–21. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson K. A., Jennison K. M. The drinking-smoking syndrome and social context. Int J Addict. 1992;27(7):749–792. doi: 10.3109/10826089209068767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mullins R., Borland R. Preference and requests for smoke-free dining. Aust J Public Health. 1995 Feb;19(1):100–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00308.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Owen N., Borland R. Delayed compensatory cigarette consumption after a workplace smoking ban. Tob Control. 1997 Summer;6(2):131–135. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.2.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]