Skip to main content
PMC home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2001 Mar;10(1):27–32. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.1.27

Smoking cessation activities by general practitioners and practice nurses

A McEwen 1, R West 1
PMCID: PMC1763978  PMID: 11226357

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To assess general practitioners' and practice nurses' self reported behaviour, attitudes, and knowledge in relation to smoking cessation.
DESIGN AND SETTING—Two postal surveys of random national samples of 303 GPs (survey 1) and 459 practice nurses (survey 2) covering England and Wales; effective response rates were 75% and 96%, respectively.
RESULTS—Survey 1 found that 96% of GPs accepted that intervening against smoking was part of their role and almost all (99%) said that they recorded smoking status when patients registered; 57% reported that they routinely updated their records on smoking status, 50% said they advised smokers to stop during most or all consultations, and 76% said they advised smokers to cut down if they cannot stop. A large majority (83%) said they either recommended or prescribed nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Although most GPs (86%) thought that NRTs were effective, only a minority thought they were worth the cost (47%) or should be on National Health Service (NHS) prescription (32%). There was little evidence that previous training in smoking cessation was associated with more activity, more positive attitudes, or greater knowledge. Survey 2 found that almost all practice nurses (99%) agreed that intervening against smoking was part of their role and 95% said they advised patients to stop at least occasionally; 71% said they advised smokers to stop at most or all consultations. A majority (74%) said that they recommended NRT to their patients. As with the GPs most practice nurses thought that nicotine replacement was effective (79%), but fewer (42%) thought the cost was justified, and only about half (53%) thought it should be available on NHS prescription. Nurses who said they had been trained in smoking cessation engaged in more activity relating to smoking cessation, had more positive attitudes, and were more knowledgeable.
CONCLUSION—GPs and practice nurses accepted that intervening with smoking was an important part of their role and a large majority reported that they intervened at least with some smokers. This represents a promising baseline from which to proceed in terms of implementation of the new smoking cessation guidelines, but it is hoped that improvements can be made in terms of the frequency of updating records and intervening, and acceptance of the cost-effectiveness of NRT as a life preserving intervention.


Keywords: cessation interventions; general practitioners; practice nurses

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (133.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benowitz N. L., Jacob P., 3rd, Kozlowski L. T., Yu L. Influence of smoking fewer cigarettes on exposure to tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide. N Engl J Med. 1986 Nov 20;315(21):1310–1313. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198611203152102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boulton M. G., Williams A. Health education in the general practice consultation: doctors' advice on diet, alcohol and smoking. Health Educ J. 1983;42(2):57–63. doi: 10.1177/001789698304200211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brenner H. Alternative approaches for estimating prevalence in epidemiologic surveys with two waves of respondents. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Dec 1;142(11):1236–1245. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coleman T., Murphy E., Cheater F. Factors influencing discussion of smoking between general practitioners and patients who smoke: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Mar;50(452):207–210. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gilbert J. R., Wilson D. M., Singer J., Lindsay E. A., Willms D. G., Best J. A., Taylor D. W. A family physician smoking cessation program: an evaluation of the role of follow-up visits. Am J Prev Med. 1992 Mar-Apr;8(2):91–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lancaster T., Dobbie W., Vos K., Yudkin P., Murphy M., Fowler G. Randomized trial of nurse-assisted strategies for smoking cessation in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Mar;49(440):191–194. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Law M., Tang J. L. An analysis of the effectiveness of interventions intended to help people stop smoking. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Oct 9;155(18):1933–1941. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McAvoy B. R., Kaner E. F., Lock C. A., Heather N., Gilvarry E. Our Healthier Nation: are general practitioners willing and able to deliver? A survey of attitudes to and involvement in health promotion and lifestyle counselling. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Mar;49(440):187–190. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rollnick S., Butler C. C., Stott N. Helping smokers make decisions: the enhancement of brief intervention for general medical practice. Patient Educ Couns. 1997 Jul;31(3):191–203. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(97)01004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wilson A., McDonald P., Hayes L., Cooney J. Health promotion in the general practice consultation: a minute makes a difference. BMJ. 1992 Jan 25;304(6821):227–230. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6821.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES