Abstract
Heavy metals, such as cadmium, copper, lead, chromium and mercury, are important environmental pollutants, particularly in areas with high anthropogenic pressure. Their presence in the atmosphere, soil and water, even in traces can cause serious problems to all organisms, and heavy metal bioaccumulation in the food chain especially can be highly dangerous to human health. Heavy metals enter the human body mainly through two routes namely: inhalation and ingestion, ingestion being the main route of exposure to these elements in human population. Heavy metals intake by human populations through food chain has been reported in many countries. Soil threshold for heavy metal toxicity is an important factor affecting soil environmental capacity of heavy metal and determines heavy metal cumulative loading limits. For soil-plant system, heavy metal toxicity threshold is the highest permissible content in the soil (total or bioavailable concentration) that does not pose any phytotoxic effects or heavy metals in the edible parts of the crops does not exceed food hygiene standards. Factors affecting the thresholds of dietary toxicity of heavy metal in soil-crop system include: soil type which includes soil pH, organic matter content, clay mineral and other soil chemical and biochemical properties; and crop species or cultivars regulated by genetic basis for heavy metal transport and accumulation in plants. In addition, the interactions of soil-plant root-microbes play important roles in regulating heavy metal movement from soil to the edible parts of crops. Agronomic practices such as fertilizer and water managements as well as crop rotation system can affect bioavailability and crop accumulation of heavy metals, thus influencing the thresholds for assessing dietary toxicity of heavy metals in the food chain. This paper reviews the phytotoxic effects and bioaccumulation of heavy metals in vegetables and food crops and assesses soil heavy metal thresholds for potential dietary toxicity.
Keywords: Heavy metals, Dietary toxicity, Vegetables, Food crops
INTRODUCTION
Regulation, handling and bioremediation of hazardous materials require an assessment of the risk to some living species other than human being, or assessment of hazard to the entire ecosystem. Assessment endpoints are values of the ecosystem that are to be protected and are identified early in the analysis. Such endpoints may include life cycle stages of a species and reproductive or growth patterns. Ecosystem risk assessment is at its dawn with this area of environment sciences still requiring extensive work in the industrialized nations of the world for sustainability of the global ecosystem.
Heavy metals, such as cadmium, copper, lead, chromium and mercury, are important environmental pollutants, particularly in areas with high anthropogenic pressure. Their presence in the atmosphere, soil and water, even in traces, can cause serious problems to all organisms. Heavy metal accumulation in soils is of concern in agricultural production due to the adverse effects on food quality (safety and marketability), crop growth (due to phytotoxicity) (Ma et al., 1994; Msaky and Calvert, 1990; Fergusson, 1990) and environmental health (soil flora/fauna and terrestrial animals). The mobilization of heavy metals into the biosphere by human activity has become an important process in the geochemical cycling of these metals. This is acutely evident in urban areas where various stationary and mobile sources release large quantities of heavy metals into the atmosphere and soil, exceeding the natural emission rates (Nriagu, 1989; Bilos et al., 2001). Heavy metal bioaccumulation in the food chain can be especially highly dangerous to human health. These metals enter the human body mainly through two routes namely: inhalation and ingestion, and with ingestion being the main route of exposure to these elements in human population. Heavy metals intake by human populations through the food chain has been reported in many countries with this problem receiving increasing attention from the public as well as governmental agencies, particularly in developing countries.
Vegetables constitute essential diet components by contributing protein, vitamins, iron, calcium and other nutrients, which are usually in short supply (Thompson and Kelly, 1990). They also act as buffering agents for acidic substances produced during the digestion process. However, they contain both essential and toxic elements over a wide range of concentrations. Metal accumulation in vegetables may pose a direct threat to human health (Türkdogan et al., 2003; Damek-Poprawa and Sawicka-Kapusta, 2003). Chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis L. cv. Zao-Shu 5), winter greens (B. rosularis var. Tsen et Lee cv. Shang-Hai-Qing), pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) and celery (Apiumg graveolens L. var. dulce DC) are some crops, which were assessed for heavy metal toxicity. Vegetables take up metals by absorbing them from contaminated soils, as well as from deposits on different parts of the vegetables exposed to the air from polluted environments (Zurera-Cosano et al., 1989). It has been reported that nearly half of the mean ingestion of lead, cadmium and mercury through food is due to plant origin (fruit, vegetables and cereals). Moreover, some population groups seem to be more exposed, especially vegetarians, since they absorb more frequently ‘tolerable daily doses’.
Food contamination by heavy metals depends both on their mobility in the soil and their bioavailability. Though some of the mobility and bioavailability factors are easy to measure, determination of the food risk contamination is tricky. The aim of the present paper is to review concisely the phytotoxic effects and bioaccumulation of heavy metals in vegetables and food crops and assessment of soil heavy metal thresholds for potential dietary toxicity.
HAZARDOUS EFFECTS OF HEAVY METALS ON HUMAN HEALTH
Chronic low-level intakes of heavy metals have damaging effects on human beings and other animals, since there is no good mechanism for their elimination. Metals such as lead, mercury, cadmium and copper are cumulative poisons. These metals cause environmental hazards and are reported to be exceptionally toxic (Ellen et al., 1990). Vegetables take up metals by absorbing them from contaminated soils, as well as from deposits on parts of the vegetables exposed to the air from polluted environments (Zurera-Cosano et al., 1989).
Metal contamination of garden soils may be widespread in urban areas due to past industrial activity and the use of fossil fuels (Chronopoulos et al., 1997; Sánchez-Camazano et al., 1994; Sterrett et al., 1996; van Lune, 1987; Wong, 1996). Heavy metals may enter the human body through inhalation of dust, direct ingestion of soil, and consumption of food plants grown in metal-contaminated soil (Cambra et al., 1999; Dudka and Miller, 1999; Hawley, 1985). Potentially toxic metals are also present in commercially produced foodstuffs (DEFRA, 1999). Exposure to potentially toxic metals from dust inhalation or soil ingestion is usually modelled simply as the concentration of a contaminant measured in the soil multiplied by the quantity of dust inhaled or soil ingested (Konz et al., 1989). This is a conservative approach to estimate dose, because the bioaccessibility of heavy metals adsorbed on ingested soil is not 100% (Ruby et al., 1999). However, predicting exposure to potentially toxic metals from consumption of food crops is more complicated because uptake of metals by plants depends on soil properties and plant physiologic factors. This leads to much larger uncertainties associated with estimating potential doses through food chains compared to the uncertainties associated with other exposure pathways such as soil ingestion and dust inhalation (McKone, 1994).
Lead is a toxic element that can be harmful to plants, although plants usually show ability to accumulate large amounts of lead without visible changes in their appearance or yield. In many plants, Pb accumulation can exceed several hundred times the threshold of maximum level permissible for human (Wierzbicka, 1995). The introduction of Pb into the food chain may affect human health, and thus, studies concerning Pb accumulation in vegetables have increasing importance (Coutate, 1992). Although a maximum Pb limit for human health has been established for edible parts of crops (0.2 mg/kg) (Chinese Department of Preventive Medicine, 1994), soil Pb thresholds for producing safe vegetables are not available.
Knowledge of Zn toxicity in humans is minimal. The most important information reported is its interference with Cu metabolism (Barone et al., 1998; Gyorffy and Chan, 1992). The symptoms that an acute oral Zn dose may provoke include: tachycardia, vascular shock, dyspeptic nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, pancreatictis and damage of hepatic parenchyma (Salgueiro et al., 2000). Although maximum Zn tolerance for human health has been established for edible parts of crops (20 mg/kg) (Chinese Department of Preventive Medicine, 1995), soil Zn threshold for producing safe vegetables is not available.
According to Hough et al.(2004) under Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, the UK government favors a “suitable for use” approach to redevelopment (DETR, 2000): Land is contaminated only if the current or intended use of a site has the potential to cause an unacceptable health risk to human occupants or to the environment. Under the UK Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (DETR, 2000), this approach requires that land be assessed for redevelopment on a site-specific basis. At present, concentrations of metals in the soil are compared to metal-specific “trigger values” (termed “maximum contaminant levels” or “maximum contaminant concentrations” in North America). In the past these trigger values were based on total contaminant concentration in the soil (ICRCL, 1987). More recently, the introduction of Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment (CLEA) (DEFRA and Environment Agency, 2002a) in April 2002 has replaced these trigger values with generic soil guidance values (SGVs) (DEFRA and Environment Agency, 2002b). The SGVs are considered a significant improvement on the previous ICRCL values and for Cd at least, soil pH categories are employed where food plants are to be grown. Where a soil exceeds the SGV, it is recommended that a risk assessment or remediation measure be conducted for the site in question (DEFRA and Environment Agency, 2002b). Additionally, exceeding of an SGV indicates that some further risk management action should be undertaken. However, the use of single trigger values or SGVs for most scenarios may represent a poor indication of the risk associated with a specific site. There is therefore a requirement for site-specific risk assessment based on commonly measured geochemical and population parameters (Hough et al., 2004).
GROWTH RESPONSES OF VEGETABLES TO HEAVY METALS
Crop plants growing on heavy metal contaminated medium can accumulate high concentrations of trace elements to cause serious health risk to consumers. Long et al.(2003) studied the effects of excess zinc on plant growth of three selected vegetables i.e. Chinese cabbage, celery and pakchoi. They found that excess Zn in growth media caused toxicity to all three vegetable crops. Toxicity symptoms included chlorosis in young leaves, browning of coralloid roots, and serious inhibition on plant growth. Shoot fresh weight (FW) progressively decreased with increasing Zn concentrations. Large differences in Zn tolerance were also noted among the three vegetable crops (Table 1). Celery was more sensitive to higher Zn levels and reduced shoot growth than Chinese cabbage and pakchoi. Shoot FW decreased to approximately 63%, 73% and 36% of the control for Chinese cabbage, pakchoi and celery, respectively, when plants were grown at Zn level of 50 mg/L.
Table 1.
Species | Added Zn (mg/kg) | DTPA-Zn (mg/kg) | Plant height (cm) |
FW (g/pot) |
DW (g/pot) |
||||
Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | ||||||
Chinese cabbage | CK | 18.1 | 15.4 a | 78.35 a A | 2.83 a | 5.16 a A | 0.42 a | ||
100 | 71.7 | 14.8 ab | 70.72 b B | 2.78 a | 4.55 b B | 0.41 a | |||
200 | 132.2 | 14.3 ab | 66.22 bc BC | 2.77 a | 4.32 b B | 0.40 a | |||
300 | 172.3 | 13.9 a | 61.29 c CD | 2.76 a | 3.82 c C | 0.41 a | |||
400 | 233.2 | 14.7 ab | 54.84 d D | 2.74 a | 3.69 c C | 0.40 a | |||
Pakchoi | CK | 18.1 | 18.1 a A | 93.22 a A | 3.66 a A | 5.53 ab C | 0.65 a A | ||
100 | 71.7 | 19.1 a A | 104.96 a A | 3.06 b B | 6.22 a A | 0.57 a AB | |||
200 | 132.2 | 18.5 a A | 88.57 a AB | 2.49 c C | 5.51 ab A | 0.46 b BC | |||
300 | 172.3 | 15.3 b B | 61.77 b BC | 2.11 d C | 4.44 bc AB | 0.38 b CD | |||
400 |
233.2 |
13.1 c B |
40.11 c C |
1.47 e D |
3.35 c B |
0.26 c D |
|||
FW (g/pot) |
DW (g/pot) |
||||||||
Stem |
Leaf |
Root |
Stem |
Leaf |
Root |
||||
Celery | CK | 18.1 | 24.7 a | 39.46 a A | 32.61 a A | 23.86 a A | 3.68 a A | 5.01 A | 4.16 a A |
100 | 71.7 | 25.8 a | 36.41 a A | 28.85 b B | 17.59 b B | 3.04 b B | 4.22 B | 3.08 b B | |
200 | 132.2 | 25.0 a | 29.82 b B | 22.56 c C | 16.31 b BC | 2.58 c C | 3.33 C | 2.88 b BC | |
300 | 172.0 | 25.4 a | 28.72 bc B | 20.37 d D | 14.83 c CD | 2.47 cd C | 3.01 D | 2.60 c CD | |
400 | 233.2 | 24.9 a | 26.25 c B | 19.26 e D | 13.34 d C | 2.24 dc | 2.73 E | 2.32 d D |
All data are means of 4 replications; Values followed by the same letter within the same column for each vegetable species are not significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test (lowercase: P>0.05; uppercase: P>0.01) within the same column for each vegetable species; FW: Fresh weight; DW: Dry weight
Although no visible Zn toxicity symptoms were observed in the soil experiment, shoot growth was significantly inhibited at Zn levels above 200 mg/kg for celery and Chinese cabbage, and above 300 mg/kg for pakchoi (Table 1). Shoot DW (dry weight) decreased by 10% for Chinese cabbage and celery, but increased by 13% for pakchoi when grown at the soil diethylenetriamene pentaacetic acid (DTPA) extractable Zn level of 72 mg/kg. However, at soil DTPA-Zn levels up to 172 mg/kg, similar yield reduction was observed with celery and pakchoi (Long et al., 2003). Root DW was reduced more than shoot DW for pakchoi grown at high Zn levels. Similar sensitivity of both root and shoot growth to Zn toxicity was noted for celery. The results showed that pakchoi required higher soil Zn concentrations for optimal growth and was more tolerant to Zn at soil available Zn concentrations less than 132 mg/kg than the other two vegetable species (Long et al., 2003).
Xiong and Wang (2005) showed that seed germination was significantly adversely influenced by Cu (P<0.001) in Brassica pekinensis. The 0.5 mmol/L Cu treatment remarkably reduced the germination rate, and the LC 50 (median lethal concentration), calculated as the lethal effect on seed germination, was 0.348 mmol/L. Root and shoot lengths of the young seedlings were also inhibited by Cu, but stimulatory elongation of the shoots occurred with the 0.008 mmol/L treatment.
Further investigations (Zhang and Zhou, 2005) showed that the Al-based coagulants at the tested concentrations had a poisonous effect on the germination of vegetable seeds. There were positive curvilinear or linear relationships between the inhibitory rate of seed germination and the concentration of Al in the acidic and neutral conditions except for the toxic effects of PAC (polyaluminum-chloride) on Brassica chinensis in the neutral condition (Zhang and Zhou, 2005). Moreover there were obvious differences in root elongation of Brassica chinensis exposed to AlCl3 in various pH conditions.
High copper levels in growth media caused toxicity to all the three vegetable crops, resulted in chlorosis in new leaves, brown, stunted, coralloid roots, and plant growth was inhibited (Yang et al., 2002). Shoot fresh weight (FW) progressively decreased with increasing Cu levels in the nutrient solution. Great differences in Cu tolerance were also noted among the three vegetable crops. Shoot fresh weight of pakchoi, celery and Chinese cabbage decreased to about 33%, 37% and 50% of the control, respectively, when grown with Cu supply of 10 mg/L. These results indicate that celery is more tolerant to the toxicity of Cu than Chinese cabbage or pakchoi grown in nutrient solution (Yang et al., 2002).
Other studies conducted on vegetables i.e. celery, Chinese cabbage and winter greens by Ni et al.(2002) demonstrated that no nutrient deficiency or toxicity symptoms caused by cadmium were visible on any plant. Biomass productions of root and shoot for Chinese cabbage and winter greens, as well as root, petiole and leaf blade for celery, expressed as FW were not significantly different among the treatments (Table 2).
Table 2.
Extractable Cd con. of soil (mg/kg) | Biomass production expressed as FW (g/pot) |
||||||
Chinese cabbage |
Winter greens |
Celery |
|||||
Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | Petiole | Blade | |
0.15 | 3.0 a | 62.7 a | 3.0 a | 64.7 a | 23.6 a | 32.6 a | 32.4 a |
0.89 | 3.1 a | 69.1 a | 2.7 a | 60.0 a | 23.7 a | 32.9 a | 33.6 a |
1.38 | 3.0 a | 61.3 a | 2.5 a | 63.3 a | 22.5 a | 33.5 a | 32.0 a |
1.84 | 3.1 a | 64.7 a | 2.8 a | 65.1 a | 22.7 a | 33.2 a | 32.2 a |
2.30 |
3.2 a |
69.8 a |
2.7 a |
62.8 a |
22.9 a |
32.6 a |
32.2 a |
F-anova | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
NS: Non-significant; Values followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test (P>0.05)
HEAVY METAL UPTAKE AND ACCUMULATION IN DIFFERENT PLANT PARTS OF VEGETABLES
Plant species and varieties vary in their capacity for heavy metal accumulation. Long et al.(2003) showed that zinc uptake and accumulation by shoots and roots varied with Zn levels in growth media and vegetable types (Table 3). Both shoot and root Zn concentrations increased sharply with increasing Zn concentrations for Chinese cabbage, celery and pakchoi. However, shoots contained over 3-fold less Zn than roots when grown under nutrient solution culture conditions. The three vegetable crops differed greatly in their ability to take up Zn from the growth media and to transport it to the shoots. At an external Zn level of 25 mg/L, shoot Zn concentration of Chinese cabbage was almost 2-fold lower than that of pakchoi or celery (Table 3). Zinc concentration in the edible part of celery was nearly 2-fold higher than that of the other two species when grown at higher Zn levels (50 mg/L). Moreover, under soil culture conditions, the zinc accumulation coefficient (AF) in shoots increased for pakchoi, but decreased for celery and Chinese cabbage when soil available Zn was raised from 18 to 172 mg/L (Table 4). However, root Zn AF increased to varied extents, with increasing soil Zn for all the vegetables. Celery showed the highest AF in edible parts at low soil Zn i.e. CK (control), whereas pakchoi had the highest AF of Zn at higher soil available Zn levels. The AF for zinc in edible parts of the three vegetable crops decreased in the order: pakchoi, celery (stem) and Chinese cabbage. Significant positive correlations were noted between shoot Zn and soil available Zn level (Long et al., 2003). Zn threshold for human health has been established to be 20 mg/kg (Chinese Department of Preventive Medicine, 1995).
Table 3.
Zn supply levels (mg/L) | Zn concentrations (mg/kg DW) |
||||||
Chinese cabbage |
Pakchoi |
Celery |
|||||
Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | Stem | Leaf | |
0.03 | 135.5 e | 65.9 e | 127.5 e | 61.7 d | 115.0 e | 72.5 e | 125.8 e |
25 | 1167 d | 494 d | 1587 d | 925 c | 2308 d | 870 d | 1295 d |
50 | 2313 c | 1024 c | 2623 c | 977 c | 4350 c | 2820 c | 2070 c |
100 | 3595 b | 1835 b | 4642 b | 1883 b | 7567 b | 4075 b | 2342 b |
200 | 12807 a | 2975 a | 7483 a | 2375 a | 12823 a | 4514 a | 2978 a |
All data are means of 3 replications; Values followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test (P>0.05)
Table 4.
Zn added to soil (mg/kg) | DTPA-Zn (mg/kg) | Zn AFs |
||||||
Chinese cabbage |
Pakchoi |
Celery |
||||||
Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | Stem | Leaf | ||
CK | 18.1 | 0.158 b | 0.039 b | 0.169 e | 0.056 e | 0.290 d | 0.113 c | 0.195 a |
200 | 71.7 | 0.133 c | 0.030 c | 0.284 d | 0.078 d | 0.507 c | 0.068 a | 0.138 b |
400 | 132.2 | 0.135 c | 0.036 b | 0.292 c | 0.098 c | 0.419 b | 0.069 a | 0.114 c |
600 | 172.3 | 0.143 d | 0.042 d | 0.415 b | 0.119 b | 0.577 a | 0.066 b | 0.135 b |
800 | 233.2 | 0.235 a | 0.058 a | 0.709 a | 0.189 a | 0.572 a | 0.068 a | 0.130 d |
AF=Zn in plant tissues (mg/kg)/total Zn in soil (mg/kg); All data are means of 4 replications; Values followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test (P>0.05)
Ni et al.(2002) studied the effect of Cd on the growth of three vegetable crops i.e. Chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis L. cv. Zao-Shu 5), winter greens (B. rosularis var. Tsen et Lee cv. Shang-Hai-Qing), and celery (Apiumg graveolens L. var. dulce DC). Their results indicated that the cadmium concentrations in shoots and roots varied both with different Cd levels and type of vegetable. Generally Cd accumulation in various plant parts in vegetable crops increased with the increasing cadmium concentrations in the growth medium. Root Cd increased more sharply than shoot Cd. Celery contained higher Cd in the edible parts than other vegetable species (Table 5).
Table 5.
Extractable Cd of soil (mg/kg) | Plant Cd contents (mg/kg FW) |
||||||
Chinese cabbage |
Winter greens |
Celery |
|||||
Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | Stem | Leaf | |
0.15 | 0.017 e | 0.010 e | 0.023 e | 0.022 e | 0.096 e | 0.020 e | 0.020 e |
0.89 | 0.158 d | 0.049 d | 0.095 d | 0.038 d | 0.265 d | 0.085 d | 0.040 d |
1.38 | 0.332 c | 0.076 c | 0.151 c | 0.103 c | 0.385 c | 0.113 c | 0.072 c |
1.84 | 0.455 b | 0.086 b | 0.235 b | 0.119 b | 0.439 b | 0.204 b | 0.082 b |
2.30 |
1.095 a |
0.151 a |
0.428 a |
0.166 a |
0.653 a |
0.241 a |
0.253 a |
F-anova | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
represents significant differences between values at P=0.01 by ANOVA test; Values followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test (P=0.01)
Yang et al.(2002) studied the response of three vegetables to Cu toxicity and found that Cu levels in both root and shoot increased, but root Cu concentration increased more sharply than shoot with increasing Cu levels in growth media. Cu mainly accumulated in roots while a small fraction (10%~20%) of absorbed Cu was transported to shoot (Table 6). Celery accumulated higher Cu content both in roots (1557 mg/L) and shoot (166.7 mg/L in leaves).
Table 6.
Cu levels (mg/L) | Cu concentration (mg/kg DW) |
||||||
Chinese cabbage |
Pakchoi |
Celery |
|||||
Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | Stem | Leaf | |
0.01 | 13.00 | 13.34 | 18.67 | 9.00 | 27.00 | 21.50 | 31.17 |
10 | 238.30 | 45.00 | 235.80 | 17.67 | 566.70 | 53.00 | 65.83 |
20 | 361.30 | 58.75 | 475.00 | 32.33 | 1312.00 | 81.50 | 101.00 |
30 | 565.60 | 71.13 | 528.30 | 128.30 | 1423.00 | 95.00 | 123.30 |
40 |
711.30 |
97.50 |
705.60 |
179.20 |
1557.00 |
145.00 |
166.70 |
LSD0.05 | 5.36 | 3.58 | 8.34 | 6.67 | 11.23 | 9.47 | 10.32 |
Copper AFs in the shoots of vegetable species were relatively small when grown at soil addition Cu levels of 200~400 mg/kg and dramatically increased at soil addition Cu levels above 600 mg/kg (Table 7).
Table 7.
Cu added to soil (mg/kg) | Cu AFs |
||||||
Chinese cabbage |
Pakchoi |
Celery |
|||||
Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | Stem | Leaf | |
CK | 0.223 | 0.060 | 0.438 | 0.074 | 0.117 | 0.005 | 0.090 |
200 | 0.081 | 0.016 | 0.091 | 0.013 | 0.062 | 0.008 | 0.071 |
400 | 0.081 | 0.014 | 0.071 | 0.010 | 0.134 | 0.009 | 0.084 |
600 | 0.091 | 0.019 | 0.072 | 0.017 | 0.318 | 0.015 | 0.107 |
800 |
0.167 |
0.030 |
0.157 |
0.036 |
0.324 |
0.017 |
0.150 |
LSD0.05 | 0.007 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.017 | 0.003 | 0.009 |
While investigating copper toxicity and bioaccumulation in Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis Rupr.), Xiong and Wang (2005) found that Cu concentration in the shoots was significantly influenced by Cu treatment (P<0.001). Cu concentration increased markedly with an increase in the soil Cu concentration. With a background level of Cu (the control, 13.6 mg/kg dry soil), Cu concentration in the shoots was 9.9 mg/kg. With the 0.2 mmol/kg treatment, shoot Cu concentration rose to 42.5 mg/kg. With the 1.0 mmol/kg treatment, shoot Cu concentration was 119.0 mg/kg (1.9 mmol/kg). According to the LSD test, shoot Cu concentration in both treatments was significantly higher than that in the control. These facts showed that when Chinese cabbage (cultivar Xiayangbai) plants were exposed to certain levels of Cu pollution, the shoots could accumulate a relatively high amount of Cu.
SOIL THRESHOLD VALUES OF POTENTIAL DIETARY TOXICITY
Soil threshold for heavy metal toxicity is an important factor affecting soil environment capacity of heavy metal and determining heavy metal cumulative loading limit. For the soil-plant system, the heavy metal toxicity threshold is the highest permissible content in the soil (total or bioavailable concentration) that does not produce any phytotoxicity (i.e., inhibition of plant growth and decrease of yield), or the heavy metal in the edible parts of crops does not exceed the critical dietary heavy metal threshold for human health. During the recent years much effort was exerted to calculate the soil thresholds of potential dietary toxicity by different ways.
The critical food Cu threshold for human health has been established to be 10 mg/kg (Chinese Department of Preventive Medicine, 1995). Yang et al. (2002) reported that from the regression lines between shoot DM yields and Cu concentration in plant tissue or soil, soil Cu thresholds for phytotoxicity (10% yield reduction) and potential dietary toxicity in edible parts of the vegetables could be calculated. Soil total and available Cu thresholds for potential dietary toxicity in the edible parts of vegetable crops were 5-fold higher than those for phytotoxicity (at 10% yield reduction) (Table 8). Among the three vegetable crops, pakchoi had much lower soil total and available Cu thresholds, as compared with the other two vegetable species.
Table 8.
Crop species | Total Cu (mg/kg) |
Available Cu (mg/kg) |
||
PDT≤10 mg/kg | SDMYR by 10% | PDT≤10 mg/kg | SDMYR by 10% | |
Chinese cabbage | 835.56 | 142.84 | 338.98 | 50.58 |
Pakchoi | 429.93 | 167.52 | 269.14 | 57.64 |
Celery (stem) | 608.22 | 174.18 | 312.72 | 70.68 |
Celery (Leaf) | 161.07 | 232.03 | 57.22 | 92.09 |
Note: PDT: Potential dietary toxicity; SDMYR: Shoot dry matter yield reduction
The critical dietary Zn threshold for human health has been established to be 20 mg/kg (Chinese Department of Preventive Medicine, 1995). Long et al.(2003) showed that from the regression equations between shoot yield or Zn concentration and soil total or available Zn, soil Zn thresholds for yield reduction (decreased 10%) and potential dietary toxicity in edible parts of the vegetables could be calculated (Table 9). The total soil Zn thresholds for shoot dry matter yield reduction were higher for pakchoi and only slightly lower for celery (stem), than that for potential dietary toxicity. Soil available Zn thresholds for Zn potential dietary toxicity were 175.6, 74.9 and 101.0 mg/kg for Chinese cabbage, pakchoi, and celery (stem), respectively. For pakchoi, a higher soil available Zn threshold for yield reduction (10%) (103 mg/kg) was again noted relating to that for potential dietary toxicity (74.9 mg/kg). The lower soil available Zn threshold for Zn potential dietary toxicity for pakchoi than for the other vegetable species is mainly associated with its greater ability to absorb Zn from the soil and to translocate and accumulate Zn in the shoots. These results indicate that some vegetable species, like pakchoi, may accumulate Zn in the edible part over dietary toxic threshold before yield reduction occurs.
Table 9.
Crop species | Total Zn (mg/kg) |
Available Zn (mg/kg) |
||
PDT≤20 mg/kg | SDMYR by 10% | PDT≤20 mg/kg | SDMYR by 10% | |
Chinese cabbage | 413 | 244 | 175.6 | 85.6 |
Pakchoi | 224 | 277 | 74.9 | 103.0 |
Celery (stem) | 272 | 220 | 101.0 | 73.0 |
Celery (Leaf) | 122 | 187 | 19.4 | 55.8 |
Note: PDT: Potential dietary toxicity; SDMYR: Shoot dry matter yield reduction
Based on the regression equation established in our study and the limit of cadmium concentration in vegetable products (0.05 mg/kg fresh weight, GBN 238-84 in China), the threshold of Cd concentration in growth media was evaluated as 0.5 mg/kg of soil extractable Cd for soil. The results indicated that the criteria for extractable Cd content in soil were 0.869, 0.730 and 0.489 mg/kg soil for Chinese cabbage, winter greens and celery, respectively (Table 10) (Ni et al., 2002).
Table 10.
Species | Correlative equation | Correlative coefficient | Significance | Criteria of Cd concentrations (mg/kg soil) |
Chinese cabbage | Cp=0.0575Cs | 0.965 (n=5) | ** | 0.869 |
Winter greens | Cp=0.0685Cs | 0.969 (n=5) | ** | 0.730 |
Celery | Cp=0.1022Cs | 0.983 (n=5) | ** | 0.489 |
represents that the correlative relationship is significant at the level of 1%
BIOAVAILABILITY OF ADDED HEAVY METAL IN THE VEGETABLE GARDEN SOIL
Total soil metals can be used to estimate the degree of soil exposure to heavy metal pollution, although this is not generally well correlated with metal mobility and bioavailability (Kuo et al., 1983). Metals such as Zn exist in soils in various fractions, chemical species or forms including: exchangeable, carbonate-bound, oxide-bound, organic matter-bound and crystal lattice metals (Shuman, 1991). Availability of soil Zn to plants differs and may be governed by dynamic equilibrium among these fractions (Kiekens, 1990). The biologically active fractions of Zn in soils mainly consist of its soluble, exchangeable and complexed forms. Many studies showed that DTPA-etractable Zn is correlated well with plant uptake Zn (Arnesen and Singh, 1998; Miner et al., 1997). DTPA extractable Zn decreased progressively with incubation time, and leveled off in 8~12 weeks of incubation. However, after 12-week incubation, 60%~70% of added Zn was still extractable by the DTPA method (Long et al., 2003). The results showed that a major portion of the Zn added to the garden soil is phytoavailable, which is in agreement with other studies (Cajuste et al., 2000; Darmawa and Wada, 1999).
Total copper in soil includes six pools classified according to their physicochemical behavior. The pools are soluble ions and inorganic and organic complexes in soil solution; exchangeable Cu; stable organic complexes in humus; Cu adsorbed by hydrous oxides of Mn, Fe and Al; Cu adsorbed on the clay-humus colloidal complex; and crystal lattice-bound Cu (Baker, 1990). When added to soil, Cu may react with soil constituents, changes its chemical form, then its availability to plants is also altered. The amount of soil Cu removed by a chemical chelating agent like DTPA or EDTA is considered as the plant available portion (Baker, 1990). The DTPA extractable Cu decreased with incubation time, especially in the first 8 weeks. After 12-week incubation, 60% of added Cu was not extractable by DTPA. These may have resulted from transformation of the added soluble Cu fraction to slowly available fractions of Cu in the soil (Yang et al., 2002).
Although the amount of soil heavy metal removed by a chelating agent like DTPA or EDTA is considered to be the plant-available portion, many results have shown that the concentration of Pb is not well correlated to the amount of plant uptake (Yang and Zhang, 1993). Some results showed that significant and positive correlations existed between shoot Pb and soil NH4NO3-extractable Pb levels (Song, 2002).
SOIL-PLANT-MAN RELATIONS DETERMINING HEAVY METAL TOXICITY
Soil-to-plant transfer is one of the key components of human exposure to metals through the food chain. Lăcătuşu et al.(1996) studied soil-plant-man relationships in heavy metal polluted areas in Romania and detected significant overclark levels of Cd and Pb from the geogenic abundance viewpoint. Although the polluted soils were neutral to slightly alkaline and well supplied with organic matter, the soluble forms of heavy metals in EDTA-CH3COONH4, pH=7.0 represented on average 37% Cd, 17% Cu, 28% Pb and 14% Zn, respectively of their global concentration, exceeding the maximum allowable limits (MAL), for soluble forms, by on average up to 14.8 (Pb), 4.2 (Cd) and 2.1 (Zn) times. The relationship between their contents in plants and in soil (soluble forms) showed significant correlations for Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn. As a result, the contents of these elements in vegetables often exceed those allowable for normal human and animal consumption. In this case, if an adult consumed 2 kg potatoes, 2 kg tomatoes and 1 kg carrots in a week, his/her food would exceed by 12% the MAL for Cd (0.525 mg). The daily maximum allowable rate of ingested Pb (0.430 mg) could be reached by consuming 880 g of vegetables (equal parts of potatoes, tomatoes, carrots and cucumbers). The higher acidity of soils enhances the transfer of large amounts of heavy metals in soluble forms, exceeding MAL on average up to 23.4 (Pb), 2.1 (Cd), 2.8 (Cu) and 2.7 (Zn) times. As a result the average Pb content in carrots was 10 times higher than the MAL and the Pb accumulation in the lettuce, parsley and garden orach, significantly above the critical contents. At the same time, the Cd content in the analyzed vegetables exceeded by 5 times the MAL, while the Cu and Zn contents were close to critical levels (Lăcătuşu et al., 1996). Ingestion of vegetables containing high concentrations of heavy metals is one of the main ways in which these elements enter the human body. Typical diseases recorded were Pb and Cd intoxication, saturnine encephalopathy, radial nerve paralysis and saturnine colic. The most affected group of inhabitants was children (Lăcătuşu et al., 1996). Estimates from various countries showed that the dietary intake for lead in adults is between 54 mg per day (Dabeca et al., 1987) and 412 mg per day (Dick et al., 1978), and that of cadmium is between 10 and 30 mg per day (Reilly, 1991). For zinc and copper, the estimated daily intake is from 1 to 3 mg, and 10 to 20 mg, respectively (Fox, 1982). Lăcătuşu et al.(1996) found that their estimations for lead and zinc were above those reported from other countries whereas the estimation for cadmium was within the range. The levels of copper were observed to be below the estimation. Bahemuka and Mubofu (1999) suggested that a large daily intake of these vegetables is likely to cause a detrimental health hazard to the consumer.
Since the dietary intake of food may constitute a major source of long-term low-level body accumulation of heavy metals, the detrimental impact becomes apparent only after several years of exposure. Regular monitoring of these metals from effluents, sewage, in vegetables and in other food materials is essential for preventing excessive buildup of the metals in the food chain (Bahemuka and Mubofu, 1999).
CURRENT TECHNOLOGIES TO DECREASE DIETARY TOXICITY OF HEAVY METALS
Different technologies have been employed for soil decontamination. Two strategies depending on the amount of heavy metal contents in soil can be adopted. First is the application of different agronomical practices in order to minimize the availability of heavy metals in soils. These include pH modification, organic matter management, fertilizer management, and choice of the most suitable vegetables for a particular soil. This strategy can be employed in areas where heavy metal pollution is not extensive. Another way is the use of phytoremediation techniques in which metal accumulating plants are used to transport and concentrate metals from soil into the aboveground shoots, which are then harvested. This technique is ideal in soils where heavy metal pollution is very high.
Phytoremediation i.e. use of higher plants to absorb heavy metals from polluted lands, has gained much interest recently. Phytoremediation may include phytoextraction, phytoviolatilization, rhizofiltration or phytostabilization. A number of plant species from Angiospermic groups have been employed to carry out phytoremediation. Certain plants such as Thlaspi caerulenscens, Haumaniastrum robertii, Ipomoea alpina, Macadamia neurophylla, Psychotria douarret, Thlaspi rotundifolium, etc. which can selectively accumulate heavy metals are employed to remove heavy metals from soils. Such plants can accumulate 10~500 times higher levels than crops.
Uptake of metal ions is an essential part of plant nutrition. Several heavy metals such as Cu, Mn, Zn, Fe and Ni play important roles in enzyme induction and reaction, membrane function, and isozyme activity. The response of plants to high concentrations of metals varies across a broad spectrum from toxic reaction to tolerance; some plants are obligate metallophytes with a physiological requirement for elevated metal contents in soils (Nedelkoska and Doran, 2000). Of those plant species that actively accumulate metals i.e. hyperaccumulators store metals in their tissues at concentrations far exceeding those in the environment. Heavy metal contents in hyperaccumulators are at least 100 times those found in nonhyperaccumulator plants grown in soil under the same conditions (Brooks et al., 1998). The number of confirmed hyperaccumulating species is expanding rapidly, and includes about 300 plants that hyperaccumulate nickel, 26 cobalt, 24 copper, 16 zinc and 11 manganese. Hyperaccumulators of selenium, thallium, cadmium, lead and uranium have also been reported (Brooks et al., 1998).
Although the existence of hyperaccumulating plants has been known for more than 20 years, their potential environmental and commercial applications have only recently been considered in detail (Robinson et al., 1997a; 1997b). Hyperaccumulators that can remove metals from contaminated soils and polluted rivers and lakes are being investigated for phytoremediation of sites affected by sewage sludge; metal-rich mine tailings, and downwash or aerial fallout from smelting and electroplating factories (Brooks and Robinson, 1998; Salt et al., 1998). Another application is phytomining, whereby hyperaccumulator plants are grown on low-grade ores, the metal-laden crop harvested, and the biomass treated to recover the metal (Brooks et al., 1998). The advantage of this agricultural approach to mining is its low cost relative to conventional methods, allowing economic exploitation of ore or mineralized soil that is too metal-poor for direct mining operations (Nedelkoska and Doran, 2000).
So far, the mechanisms of metal uptake by hyperaccumulating plants and the basis of their metal specificity are poorly understood; the phytochemistry involved varies considerably depending on the metal and plant species (Brooks, 1998). Several reports have suggested that metals are detoxified in hyperaccumulators by binding with low-molecular-weight ligands such as histidine (Krämer et al., 1996) or organic acids such as citric, malic and malonic acids (Kersten et al., 1980; Sagner et al., 1998; Tolrà et al., 1996b). However, complexation with such universal plant metabolites is considered by some researchers to be insufficient explanation for the special properties of hyperaccumulator plants, including their metal specificity (Homer et al., 1991). Other mechanisms that could be involved in hyperaccumulation include metal translocation within the plant (Krämer et al., 1996; Tolrà et al., 1996a) and compartmentation within the cells, for example, in vacuoles (Vázquez et al., 1992). The role of phytochelatins in hyperaccumulators is unclear at present, although many plants for normal metal homeostasis use these cysteine rich peptides (Nedelkoska and Doran, 2000). Several reports have concluded that phytochelatins are not primarily responsible for hyperaccumulation of Ni or Zn (Krämer et al., 1996; Shen et al., 1997).
Most studies of hyperaccumulation have been carried out using whole plants grown either in soil or hydroponically. For investigation of the mechanisms and metabolic responses of hyperaccumulators rather than agronomic characteristics, there are advantages associated with alternative plant cultivation systems (Nedelkoska and Doran, 2000). In vitro culture of organs such as roots and shoots allows indefinite propagation and experimentation using tissues derived from the same plant, thus avoiding the effects of variability between individual specimens (Pollard and Baker, 1996). Axenic conditions in tissue culture prevent microbial symbiosis disguising the metal uptake characteristics of plants grown in soil, while better control over environmental conditions at the roots can be obtained compared with pot cultivation. Experiments using separately cultured organs also allow the metal accumulation properties of each organ to be identified without interference from translocation effects. Genetically transformed hairy roots produced by infection of plants with Agrobacterium rhizogenes are a convenient form of organ culture (Doran, 1997) and have been used previously in phytoremediation studies (Hughes et al., 1997; Macek et al., 1994; Maitani et al., 1996; Metzger et al., 1992). However, as generation of hairy roots of hyperaccumulating species has not been reported previously, their abilities to hyperaccumulate metals and their utility in hyperaccumulation research have not yet been demonstrated (Nedelkoska and Doran, 2000).
CONCLUSION
Factors affecting the thresholds of dietary toxicity of heavy metal in soil-crop system include: soil type involving soil pH, organic matter content, clay mineral and other soil chemical and biochemical properties; and crop species or cultivars regulated by genetic basis for heavy metal transport and accumulation in plants. In addition, the interactions of soil-plant roots-microbes play important roles in regulating heavy metal movement from soil to the edible parts of crops. Agronomic practices such as fertilizer and water management and crop rotation system can affect bioavailability and crop accumulation of heavy metals, thus influencing the thresholds of assessing dietary toxicity of heavy metals in food chain.
Further research is needed to find out the variations in metal uptake by different vegetable species, and the site-specific risk assessment guidelines to highlight and to minimize the potential health risks of ingesting vegetables containing high levels of heavy metals.
Footnotes
Project supported by the Science and Technology Ministry of China (No. 2002CB410804) and the Education Ministry of China (No. IRT0536)
References
- 1.Arnesen AKM, Singh BR. Plant uptake and DTPA-extractability of Cd, Cu, Ni and Zn in a Norwegian alum shale soil as affected by previous addition of dairy and pig manures and peat. Can J Soil Sci. 1998;78(3):531–539. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bahemuka TE, Mubofu EB. Heavy metals in edible green vegetables grown along the sites of the Sinza and Msimbazi rivers in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Food Chem. 1999;66(1):63–66. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00213-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baker DE. Copper. In: Alloway BJ, editor. Heavy Metals in Soils. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1990. pp. 151–196. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barone A, Ebesh O, Harper RG, Wapnir RA. Placental copper transport in rats: effects of elevated dietary zinc on fetal copper, iron and metallothionien. J Nutr. 1998;128(6):1037–1041. doi: 10.1093/jn/128.6.1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bilos C, Colombo JC, Skorupka CN, Rodriguez Presa MJ. Source, distribution and variability of airborne trace metals in La Plata City area, Argentina. Environ Pollut. 2001;111(1):149–158. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00328-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brooks RR. Plants that Hyperaccumulate Heavy Metals. Wallingford: CAB International; 1998. Phytochemistry of Hyperaccumulators; pp. 15–53. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brooks RR, Robinson BH. Aquatic Phytoremediation by Accumulator Plants. In: Brooks RR, editor. Plants that Hyperaccumulate Heavy Metals. Wallingford: CAB International; 1998. pp. 203–226. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brooks RR, Chambers MF, Nicks LJ, Robinson BH. Phytomining. Trends Plant Sci. 1998;3(9):359–362. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01283-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cajuste LJ, Cruz-Diaz J, Garcia-Osorio C. Extraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils. I. Sequential extraction in surface soils and their relationships to DTPA extractable metals and metal plant uptake. J Environ Sci Health. 2000;A35:1141–1152. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cambra K, Martínez T, Urzelai A, Alonso E. Risk analysis of a farm area near a lead- and cadmium-contaminated industrial site. J Soil Contam. 1999;8(5):527–540. doi: 10.1080/10588339991339450. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chinese Department of Preventive Medicine. Threshold for Food Hygiene. Beijing: China Standard Press; 1994. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chinese Department of Preventive Medicine. Threshold for Food Hygiene. Beijing: China Standard Press; 1995. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chronopoulos J, Haidouti C, Chronopoulou-Sereli A, Massas I. Variations in plant and soil lead and cadmium content in urban parks in Athens, Greece. Sci Total Environ. 1997;196(1):91–98. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(96)05415-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Coutate TP. Food, the Chemistry of Its Component. 2nd Ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 1992. p. 265. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dabeca RW, McKenzie AD, Lacroix GMA. Dietary intakes of lead, cadmium, arsenic and fluoride by Canadian adults, a 24 hours duplicate diet study. Food Addit Contam. 1987;4:89–102. doi: 10.1080/02652038709373618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Damek-Poprawa M, Sawicka-Kapusta K. Damage to liver, kidney, and teatis with reference to burden of heavy metals in yellow-necked mice from areas around steelworks and zinc smelters in Poland. Toxicology. 2003;186(1-2):1–10. doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00595-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Darmawa M, Wada SI. Kinetics of speciation of copper, lead, and zinc loaded to soils that differ in cation exchanger composition at low moisture content. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1999;30(30):2363–2375. [Google Scholar]
- 18.DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Total Diet Study—Aluminium, Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel, Selenium, Tin and Zinc. London: The Stationery Office; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 19.DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) and Environment Agency. Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment Model (CLEA): Technical Basis and Algorithms. Bristol, UK: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 20.DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) and Environment Agency. Assessment of Risks to Human Health from Land Contamination: An Overview of the Development of Soil Guideline Values and Related Research, CLR7. Bristol,UK: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 21.DETR (Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions) Contaminated Land: Implementation of Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. London: The Stationery Office; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dick GL, Hughes JT, Mitchell JW, David F. Survey of trace elements and pesticides in New Zealand. J Sci. 1978;21:57–69. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Doran PM. Hairy Roots: Culture and Applications. Amsterdam: Harwood; 1997. p. 239. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dudka S, Miller WP. Permissible concentrations of arsenic and lead in soils based on risk assessment. Water Air Soil Poll. 1999;113(1/4):127–132. doi: 10.1023/A:1005028905396. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ellen G, Loon JW, Tolsma K. Heavy metals in vegetables grown in the Netherlands and in domestic and imported fruits. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch. 1990;190(1):34–39. doi: 10.1007/BF01188261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fergusson JE. The Heavy Elements: Chemistry, Environmental Impact and Health Effects. Oxford: Pergamin Press; 1990. pp. 382–399. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fox BA. Food Science. London: Holder and Stoughton; 1982. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gyorffy EJ, Chan H. Copper deficiency and mycrocytic anemia resulting from prolonged ingestion of over-the-counter zinc. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87:1054–1055. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hawley JK. Assessment of health risk from exposure to contaminated soil. Risk Anal. 1985;5(4):289–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00185.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Homer FA, Reeves RD, Brooks RR, Baker AJM. Characterization of the nickel-rich extract from the nickel hyperaccumulator Dichapetalum gelonioides . Phytochemistry. 1991;30(7):2141–2145. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(91)83602-H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hough RL, Breward N, Young SD, Crout NM, Tye AM, Moir AM, Thornton I. Assessing potential risk of heavy metal exposure from consumption of home-produced vegetables by urban populations. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112(2):215–221. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hughes JB, Shanks J, Vanderford M, Lauritzen J, Bhadra R. Transformation of TNT by aquatic plants and plant tissue cultures. Environ Sci Technol. 1997;31(1):266–271. doi: 10.1021/es960409h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.ICRCL (Inter-Departmental Committee on the Redevelopment of Contaminated Land) Guidance on the Assessment and Redevelopment of Contaminated Land. 2nd Ed. London: The Stationery Office; 1987. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kersten WJ, Brooks RR, Reeves RD, Jaffré T. Nature of nickel complexes in Psychotria douarrei and other nickel-accumulating plants. Phytochemistry. 1980;19(9):1963–1965. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(80)83013-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kiekens L. Zinc. In: Alloway BJ, editor. Heavy Metals in Soils. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1990. pp. 261–279. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Konz J, Lisi K, Friebele E. Exposure Factors Handbook. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment; 1989. EPA/600/8-89/043. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Krämer U, Cotter-Howells JD, Charnock JM, Baker AJM, Smith JAC. Free histidine as a metal chelator in plants that accumulate nickel. Nature. 1996;379(6566):635–638. doi: 10.1038/379635a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kuo S, Heilman PE, Baker S. Distribution and forms of copper, zinc, cadmium, iron, and manganese in soils near a copper smelter. Soil Sci. 1983;135:101–109. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lăcătuşu R, Răuţă C, Cârstea S, Ghelase I. Soil-plant-man relationships in heavy metal polluted areas in Romania. Applied Geochem. 1996;11(1-2):105–107. doi: 10.1016/0883-2927(95)00101-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Long XX, Yang XE, Ni WZ, Ye ZQ, He ZL, Calvert DV, Stoffella JP. Assessing zinc thresholds for phytotoxicity and potential dietary toxicity in selected vegetable crops. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2003;34(9 & 10):1421–1434. doi: 10.1081/CSS-120020454. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ma QY, Traina SJ, Logan TJ. Effect of aqueous Al, Cd, Fe(II), Ni and Zn on Pb immobilization by hydroxyapatite. Environ Sci Technol. 1994;28(7):1219–1228. doi: 10.1021/es00056a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Macek T, Kotrba P, Suchova M, Skacel F, Demnerova K, Ruml T. Accumulation of cadmium by hairy-root cultures of Solanum nigrum . Biotechnol Lett. 1994;16(6):621–624. doi: 10.1007/BF00128611. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Maitani T, Kubota H, Sato K, Takeda M, Yoshihira K. Induction of phytochelatin (class III metallothionein) and incorporation of copper in transformed hairy roots of Rubia tinctorum exposed to cadmium. J Plant Physiol. 1996;147:743–748. [Google Scholar]
- 44.McKone TE. Uncertainty and variability in human exposures to soil contaminants through homegrown food: a Monte Carlo assessment. Risk Anal. 1994;14(4):449–463. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00263.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Metzger L, Fouchault I, Glad C, Prost R, Tepfer D. Estimation of cadmium availability using transformed roots. Plant Soil. 1992;143(2):249–257. doi: 10.1007/BF00007880. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Miner GS, Gutierrez R, King LD. Soil factors affecting plant concentration of cadmium, copper, and zinc on sludge-amended soils. J Environ Qual. 1997;26(4):989–994. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Msaky JJ, Calvert R. Adsorption behavior of copper and zinc in soils: influence of pH on adsorption characteristics. Soil Sci. 1990;150(2):513–522. doi: 10.1097/00010694-199008000-00004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nedelkoska TV, Doran PM. Hyperaccumulation of cadmium by hairy roots of Thlaspi caerulescens . Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000;67(5):607–615. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000305)67:5<607::AID-BIT11>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ni WZ, Long XX, Yang XE. Studies on the criteria of cadmium pollution in growth media of vegetable crops based on the hygienic limit of cadmium in food. J Plant Nutr. 2002;25(5):957–968. doi: 10.1081/PLN-120003931. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nriagu JO. A global assessment of natural sources of atmospheric trace metals. Nature. 1989;338(6210):47–49. doi: 10.1038/338047a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pollard AJ, Baker AJM. Quantitative genetics of zinc hyperaccumulation in Thlaspi caerulescens . N Phytol. 1996;132(1):113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04515.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Reilly C. Metal Contamination of Food. 2nd Ed. London: Elsevier Applied Science; 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Robinson BH, Chiarucci A, Brooks RR, Petit D, Kirkman JH, Gregg PEH, de Dominicis V. The nickel hyperaccumulator plant Alyssum bertolonii as a potential agent for phytoremediation and phytomining of nickel. J Geochem Explor. 1997;59(2):75–86. doi: 10.1016/S0375-6742(97)00010-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Robinson BH, Brooks RR, Howes AW, Kirkman JH, Gregg PEH. The potential of the high-biomass nickel hyperaccumulator Berkheya coddii for phytoremediation and phytomining. J Geochem Explor. 1997;60(2):115–126. doi: 10.1016/S0375-6742(97)00036-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ruby MV, Schoof R, Brattin W, Goldade M, Post G, Harnois M, Mosby DE, Casteel SW, Berti W, Carpenter M, et al. Advances in evaluating the oral bioavailability of inorganics in soil for use in human risk assessment. Environ Sci Technol. 1999;33(21):3697–3705. doi: 10.1021/es990479z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sagner S, Kneer R, Wanner G, Cosson JP, Deus-Neumann B, Zenk MH. Hyperaccumulation, complexation and distribution of nickel in Sebertia acuminata . Phytochemistry. 1998;47(3):339–347. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(97)00593-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Salgueiro MJ, Zubillaga M, Lysionek A, Sarabia MI, Caro R, Paoli TD, Hager A, Weill R, Boccio J. Zinc as an essential micronutrient: a review. Nutr Res. 2000;20(5):737–755. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5317(00)00163-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I. Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1998;49(1):643–668. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sánchez-Camazano M, Sánchez-Martín MJ, Lorenzo LF. Lead and cadmium in soils and vegetables from urban gardens of Salamanca (Spain) Sci Total Environ. 1994;146/147:163–168. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(94)90233-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Shen ZG, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP. Uptake and transport of zinc in the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens and the non-hyperaccumulator Thlaspi ochroleucum . Plant Cell Environ. 1997;20(7):898–906. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-134.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shuman LM. Micronutrient in Agriculture. 2nd Ed. Madison WI: Soil Science Society of America; 1991. Chemical Forms of Micronutrient in Soils; pp. 113–144. SSSA Book Series. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Song J. Assessment of Phytoavailability of Soil Metals and Phytoremediation of Soils Contaminated with Copper. China: Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences; 2002. PhD Thesis (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sterrett SB, Chaney RL, Gifford CH, Meilke HW. Influence of fertilizer and sewage sludge compost on yield of heavy metal accumulation by lettuce grown in urban soils. Environ Geochem Health. 1996;18(4):135–142. doi: 10.1007/BF01771236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Thompson HC, Kelly WC. Vegetable Crops. 5th Ed. New Delhi: MacGraw Hill Publishing Company Ltd; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Tolrà RP, Poschenrieder C, Barceló J. Zinc hyperaccumulation in Thlaspi caerulescens. I. Influence on growth and mineral nutrition. J Plant Nutr. 1996;19(12):1531–1540. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tolrà RP, Poschenrieder C, Barceló J. Zinc hyperaccumulation in Thlaspi caerulescens. II. Influence on organic acids. J Plant Nutr. 1996;19(12):1541–1550. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Türkdogan MK, Kilicel F, Kara K, Tuncer I, Uygan I. Heavy metals in soil, vegetables and fruit in the endemic upper gastrointestinal cancer region of Turkey. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003;13(3):175–179. doi: 10.1016/S1382-6689(02)00156-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.van Lune P. Cadmium and lead in soils and crops from allotment gardens in the Netherlands. Neth J Agric Sci. 1987;35:207–210. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Vázquez MD, Barceló J, Poschenrieder C, Mádico J, Hatton P, Baker AJM, Cope GH. Localization of zinc and cadmium in Thlaspi caerulescens (Brassicaceae), a metallophyte than can hyperaccumulate both metals. J Plant Physiol. 1992;140(3):350–355. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wierzbicka M. How lead loses its toxicity to plants. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 1995;64:81–90. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wong JWC. Heavy metal contents in vegetables and market garden soils in Hong Kong. Environ Technol. 1996;17(4):407–414. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Xiong ZT, Wang H. Copper toxicity and bioaccumulation in Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis Rupr.) Environ Toxicol. 2005;20(2):188–194. doi: 10.1002/tox.20094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Yang ZY, Zhang FS. The lead of soil-plant systems. Progress in Soil Science. 1993;21(5):1–10. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yang XE, Long XX, Ni WZ, Ye ZQ, He ZL, Stoffella PJ, Calvert DV. Assessing copper thresholds for phytotoxicity and potential dietary toxicity in selected vegetables crops. J Environ Sci Health. 2002;B37(6):625–635. doi: 10.1081/PFC-120015443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zhang KS, Zhou QX. Toxic effects of Al-based coagulants on Brassica chinensis and Raphanus sativus growing in acid and neutral conditions. Environ Toxicol. 2005;20(2):179–187. doi: 10.1002/tox.20093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zurera-Cosano G, Moreno-Rojas R, Salmeron-Egea J, Pozo Lora R. Heavy metal uptake from greenhouse border soils for edible vegetables. J Sci Food Agric. 1989;49(3):307–314. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740490307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]