Skip to main content
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 2001 Sep;7(Suppl 1):i43–i49. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.suppl_1.i43

Thermal protective uniforms and hoods: impact of design modifications and water content on burn prevention in New York City firefighters: laboratory and field results

D Prezant, K Malley, R Barker, C Guerth, K Kelly
PMCID: PMC1765413  PMID: 11565971

Abstract

Objectives—To determine (1) the effectiveness of hoods in reducing head burns, (2) the impact of clothes worn under the protective outer uniform (modern = long sleeve shirt and long pants; modified modern = short sleeve T-shirt and short pants) on burns, and (3) whether water content (dry, damp or saturated) affects the level of thermal protection.

Setting—Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY).

Methods—Laboratory tests (fully dressed manikin) evaluated the different uniform and water conditions when exposed to an average 24 cal/cm2 heat flux, approximately 2250°F air temperature. FDNY field results compared (1) head burns during winters wearing the hood to winters without hood and (2) upper and lower extremity burns during summers wearing traditional, modern, and modified modern uniforms.

Results—Laboratory tests showed that thermal protection was: (1) dramatically improved by the hood with protection increasing as water content increased and (2) not significantly different between modern and modified modern uniforms, regardless of water content. FDNY field results confirmed these tests showing (1) significant decreases in neck burns (by 54%), ear burns (by 60%), and head burn totals (by 46%) wearing the hood and (2) no significant differences in upper or lower extremity burns wearing modern compared with modified modern uniforms.

Conclusions—Based on combined laboratory and field results, we strongly recommend the use of modern thermal protective hoods and the modified modern uniform.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (151.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Malley K. S., Goldstein A. M., Aldrich T. K., Kelly K. J., Weiden M., Coplan N., Karwa M. L., Prezant D. J. Effects of fire fighting uniform (modern, modified modern, and traditional) design changes on exercise duration in New York City Firefighters. J Occup Environ Med. 1999 Dec;41(12):1104–1115. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199912000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Prezant D. J., Freeman K., Kelly K. J., Malley K. S., Karwa M. L., McLaughlin M. T., Hirschhorn R., Brown A. Impact of a design modification in modern firefighting uniforms on burn prevention outcomes in New York City firefighters. J Occup Environ Med. 2000 Aug;42(8):827–834. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200008000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Prezant D. J., Kelly K. J., Malley K. S., Karwa M. L., McLaughlin M. T., Hirschorn R., Brown A. Impact of a modern firefighting protective uniform on the incidence and severity of burn injuries in New York City firefighters. J Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jun;41(6):469–479. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199906000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Stoll A. M., Chianta M. A. Heat transfer through fabrics as related to thermal injury. Trans N Y Acad Sci. 1971 Nov;33(7):649–670. doi: 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1971.tb02630.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES