Abstract
Methods and Results: First, a distinction is made between adolescence (ages 10–18) and emerging adulthood (ages 18–25) in order to shed light on the reasons for especially high crash rates among 16–17 year old drivers relative to 18–25 year olds. Then various developmental sources of risk in adolescence are described, including the power of friends, the optimistic bias, and adolescent emotionality. The reasons for especially high crash rates among young males are discussed, with an emphasis on how American ideas about manhood promote driving risks. Finally, a cross national comparison between adolescents in the United States and Denmark shows how developmental risks interact with driving policies.
Conclusions: The high crash rates of adolescents relative to emerging adults and of emerging adults relative to older drivers can be explained in part by developmental factors.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (148.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Arnett J. J. Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000 May;55(5):469–480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnett J., Balle-Jensen L. Cultural bases of risk behavior: Danish adolescents. Child Dev. 1993 Dec;64(6):1842–1855. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04217.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeJoy D. M. An examination of gender differences in traffic accident risk perception. Accid Anal Prev. 1992 Jun;24(3):237–246. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(92)90003-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deery H. A., Fildes B. N. Young novice driver subtypes: relationship to high-risk behavior, traffic accident record, and simulator driving performance. Hum Factors. 1999 Dec;41(4):628–643. doi: 10.1518/001872099779656671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doherty S. T., Andrey J. C., MacGregor C. The situational risks of young drivers: the influence of passengers, time of day and day of week on accident rates. Accid Anal Prev. 1998 Jan;30(1):45–52. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00060-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halpern-Felsher B. L., Millstein S. G., Ellen J. M., Adler N. E., Tschann J. M., Biehl M. The role of behavioral experience in judging risks. Health Psychol. 2001 Mar;20(2):120–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartos J. L., Eitel P., Simons-Morton B. Do parent-imposed delayed licensure and restricted driving reduce risky driving behaviors among newly licensed teens? Prev Sci. 2001 Jun;2(2):113–122. doi: 10.1023/a:1011595714636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Irwin C. E., Jr, Cataldo M. F., Matheny A. P., Jr, Peterson L. Health consequences of behaviors: injury as a model. Pediatrics. 1992 Nov;90(5 Pt 2):798–807. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang S. W., Jemerin J. M., Tschann J. M., Irwin C. E., Jr, Wara D. W., Boyce W. T. Life events, cardiovascular reactivity, and risk behavior in adolescent boys. Pediatrics. 1995 Dec;96(6):1101–1105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Preusser D. F., Ferguson S. A., Williams A. F. The effect of teenage passengers on the fatal crash risk of teenage drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 1998 Mar;30(2):217–222. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00081-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Resnick M. D., Bearman P. S., Blum R. W., Bauman K. E., Harris K. M., Jones J., Tabor J., Beuhring T., Sieving R. E., Shew M. Protecting adolescents from harm. Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA. 1997 Sep 10;278(10):823–832. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.10.823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tränkle U., Gelau C., Metker T. Risk perception and age-specific accidents of young drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 1990 Apr;22(2):119–125. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(90)90063-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]