Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 2001 Apr;27(Suppl 1):i54–i56. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i54

Clinical governance—watchword or buzzword?

A Campbell
PMCID: PMC1765531  PMID: 11314615

Abstract

In the latest reform of the National Health Service great emphasis has been placed on the achievement and maintenance of quality. Mechanisms for ensuring this are being set up under the general title of "clinical governance". What is the meaning of this term? The metaphor behind the phrase is of navigation through stormy seas, but who guides the helmsman? Clinical ethics committees could have a part to play in these changes, provided their role is properly understood. Clinical governance is concerned with management according to an agreed set of aims. The task of ethics committees is Socratic rather than managerial. They should ask fundamental questions about the ethical norms of the services provided and give critical appraisal of the moral character of institutional policies. If these tasks are carried out then governance may become a watchword rather than just another buzzword.

Key Words: Governance • quality • National Health Service (NHS) • ethics committees • Socratic method NHS


Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES