Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1995 Jan;177(1):134–143. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.1.134-143.1995

In vivo restriction by LlaI is encoded by three genes, arranged in an operon with llaIM, on the conjugative Lactococcus plasmid pTR2030.

D J O'Sullivan 1, K Zagula 1, T R Klaenhammer 1
PMCID: PMC176565  PMID: 7528201

Abstract

The LlaI restriction and modification (R/M) system is encoded on pTR2030, a 46.2-kb conjugative plasmid from Lactococcus lactis. The llaI methylase gene, sequenced previously, encodes a functional type IIS methylase and is located approximately 5 kb upstream from the abiA gene, encoding abortive phage resistance. In this study, the sequence of the region between llaIM and abiA was determined and revealed four consecutive open reading frames (ORFs). Northern (RNA) analysis showed that the four ORFs were part of a 7-kb operon with llaIM and the downstream abiA gene on a separate transcriptional unit. The deduced protein sequence of ORF2 revealed a P-loop consensus motif for ATP/GTP-binding sites and a three-part consensus motif for GTP-binding proteins. Data bank searches with the deduced protein sequences for all four ORFs revealed no homology except for ORF2 with MerB, in three regions that coincided with the GTP-binding motifs in both proteins. To phenotypically analyze the llaI operon, a 9.0-kb fragment was cloned into a high-copy-number lactococcal shuttle vector, pTRKH2. The resulting construct, pTRK370, exhibited a significantly higher level of in vivo restriction and modification in L. lactis NCK203 than the low-copy-number parental plasmid, pTR2030. A combination of deletion constructions and frameshift mutations indicated that the first three ORFs were involved in LlaI restriction, and they were therefore designated llaI.1, llaI.2, and llaI.3. Mutating llaI.1 completely abolished restriction, while disrupting llaI.2 or llaI.3 allowed an inefficient restriction of phage DNA to occur, manifested primarily by a variable plaque phenotype. ORF4 had no discernible effect on in vivo restriction. A frameshift mutation in llaIM proved lethal to L. lactis NCK203, implying that the restriction component was active without the modification subunit. These results suggested that the LlaI R/M system is unlike any other R/M system studied to date and has diverged from the type IIS class of restriction enzymes by acquiring some characteristics reminiscent of type I enzymes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (609.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alatossava T., Klaenhammer T. R. Molecular Characterization of Three Small Isometric-Headed Bacteriophages Which Vary in Their Sensitivity to the Lactococcal Phage Resistance Plasmid pTR2030. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 May;57(5):1346–1353. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.5.1346-1353.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alvarez M. A., Chater K. F., Rodicio M. R. Complex transcription of an operon encoding the SalI restriction-modification system of Streptomyces albus G. Mol Microbiol. 1993 Apr;8(2):243–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01568.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bickle T. A., Krüger D. H. Biology of DNA restriction. Microbiol Rev. 1993 Jun;57(2):434–450. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.2.434-450.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Casadaban M. J., Cohen S. N. Analysis of gene control signals by DNA fusion and cloning in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1980 Apr;138(2):179–207. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90283-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen L. H., Emory S. A., Bricker A. L., Bouvet P., Belasco J. G. Structure and function of a bacterial mRNA stabilizer: analysis of the 5' untranslated region of ompA mRNA. J Bacteriol. 1991 Aug;173(15):4578–4586. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.15.4578-4586.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis R., van der Lelie D., Mercenier A., Daly C., Fitzgerald G. F. ScrFI restriction-modification system of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris UC503: cloning and characterization of two ScrFI methylase genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Mar;59(3):777–785. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.3.777-785.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dever T. E., Glynias M. J., Merrick W. C. GTP-binding domain: three consensus sequence elements with distinct spacing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(7):1814–1818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dila D., Sutherland E., Moran L., Slatko B., Raleigh E. A. Genetic and sequence organization of the mcrBC locus of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1990 Sep;172(9):4888–4900. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.9.4888-4900.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gamper M., Ganter B., Polito M. R., Haas D. RNA processing modulates the expression of the arcDABC operon in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Mol Biol. 1992 Aug 20;226(4):943–957. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)91044-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gorbalenya A. E., Koonin E. V. Endonuclease (R) subunits of type-I and type-III restriction-modification enzymes contain a helicase-like domain. FEBS Lett. 1991 Oct 21;291(2):277–281. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)81301-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gronenborn A. M., Clore G. M. Experimental support for the "hydrophobic zipper" hypothesis. Science. 1994 Jan 28;263(5146):536–536. doi: 10.1126/science.8290964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gubler M., Braguglia D., Meyer J., Piekarowicz A., Bickle T. A. Recombination of constant and variable modules alters DNA sequence recognition by type IC restriction-modification enzymes. EMBO J. 1992 Jan;11(1):233–240. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05046.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hill C., Miller L. A., Klaenhammer T. R. In vivo genetic exchange of a functional domain from a type II A methylase between lactococcal plasmid pTR2030 and a virulent bacteriophage. J Bacteriol. 1991 Jul;173(14):4363–4370. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.14.4363-4370.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hill C., Miller L. A., Klaenhammer T. R. Nucleotide sequence and distribution of the pTR2030 resistance determinant (hsp) which aborts bacteriophage infection in lactococci. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Jul;56(7):2255–2258. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.7.2255-2258.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hill C., Pierce K., Klaenhammer T. R. The conjugative plasmid pTR2030 encodes two bacteriophage defense mechanisms in lactococci, restriction modification (R+/M+) and abortive infection (Hsp+). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Sep;55(9):2416–2419. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.9.2416-2419.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hill C., Romero D. A., McKenney D. S., Finer K. R., Klaenhammer T. R. Localization, cloning, and expression of genetic determinants for bacteriophage resistance (Hsp) from the conjugative plasmid pTR2030. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Jul;55(7):1684–1689. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.7.1684-1689.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Janulaitis A., Petrusyte M., Maneliene Z., Klimasauskas S., Butkus V. Purification and properties of the Eco57I restriction endonuclease and methylase--prototypes of a new class (type IV). Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Nov 25;20(22):6043–6049. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.22.6043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kita K., Suisha M., Kotani H., Yanase H., Kato N. Cloning and sequence analysis of the StsI restriction-modification gene: presence of homology to FokI restriction-modification enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Aug 25;20(16):4167–4172. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.16.4167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu J., Barnell W. O., Conway T. The polycistronic mRNA of the Zymomonas mobilis glf-zwf-edd-glk operon is subject to complex transcript processing. J Bacteriol. 1992 May;174(9):2824–2833. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.9.2824-2833.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. O'Sullivan D. J., Klaenhammer T. R. High- and low-copy-number Lactococcus shuttle cloning vectors with features for clone screening. Gene. 1993 Dec 31;137(2):227–231. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90011-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. O'sullivan D. J., Hill C., Klaenhammer T. R. Effect of Increasing the Copy Number of Bacteriophage Origins of Replication, in trans, on Incoming-Phage Proliferation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Aug;59(8):2449–2456. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.8.2449-2456.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Transcription factors: structural families and principles of DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:1053–1095. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.005201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pansegrau W., Lanka E. Common sequence motifs in DNA relaxases and nick regions from a variety of DNA transfer systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Jun 25;19(12):3455–3455. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.12.3455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Petrusyte M., Bitinaite J., Menkevicius S., Klimasauskas S., Butkus V., Janulaitis A. Restriction endonucleases of a new type. Gene. 1988 Dec 25;74(1):89–91. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90259-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Raleigh E. A. Organization and function of the mcrBC genes of Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 1992 May;6(9):1079–1086. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01546.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Romero D. A., Klaenhammer T. R. Characterization of insertion sequence IS946, an Iso-ISS1 element, isolated from the conjugative lactococcal plasmid pTR2030. J Bacteriol. 1990 Aug;172(8):4151–4160. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4151-4160.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Romero D. A., Klaenhammer T. R. Construction of an IS946-based composite transposon in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis. J Bacteriol. 1991 Dec;173(23):7599–7606. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.23.7599-7606.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rouch D. A., Skurray R. A. IS257 from Staphylococcus aureus: member of an insertion sequence superfamily prevalent among gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Gene. 1989;76(2):195–205. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90160-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Saraste M., Sibbald P. R., Wittinghofer A. The P-loop--a common motif in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990 Nov;15(11):430–434. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90281-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sharp P. M., Kelleher J. E., Daniel A. S., Cowan G. M., Murray N. E. Roles of selection and recombination in the evolution of type I restriction-modification systems in enterobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 15;89(20):9836–9840. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Skowron P., Kaczorowski T., Tucholski J., Podhajska A. J. Atypical DNA-binding properties of class-IIS restriction endonucleases: evidence for recognition of the cognate sequence by a FokI monomer. Gene. 1993 Mar 15;125(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90738-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sutherland E., Coe L., Raleigh E. A. McrBC: a multisubunit GTP-dependent restriction endonuclease. J Mol Biol. 1992 May 20;225(2):327–348. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90925-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Szybalski W., Blumenthal R. M., Brooks J. E., Hattman S., Raleigh E. A. Nomenclature for bacterial genes coding for class-II restriction endonucleases and modification methyltransferases. Gene. 1988 Dec 25;74(1):279–280. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Szybalski W., Kim S. C., Hasan N., Podhajska A. J. Class-IIS restriction enzymes--a review. Gene. 1991 Apr;100:13–26. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90345-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Terzaghi B. E., Sandine W. E. Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Jun;29(6):807–813. doi: 10.1128/am.29.6.807-813.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wilson G. G. Organization of restriction-modification systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 May 25;19(10):2539–2566. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.10.2539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES