Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2003 Jun;60(Suppl 1):i83–i87. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i83

Need for recovery after work and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease in a working population

L G P M van Amelsvoort, I Kant, U Bultmann, G Swaen
PMCID: PMC1765716  PMID: 12782752

Abstract

Background: A high need for recovery after work can be regarded as a short term adverse effect of working day stressors and the person's inability to cope and recover. Consequently, it might be an intermediate factor between job stressors and cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Aim: To investigate, in a longitudinal study, the relation between need for recovery and subsequent CVD.

Methods: Data from the Maastricht Cohort Study of 12 140 workers were used, with 42 incident self reported CVD cases during 32 months of follow up. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to calculate age, gender, smoking status, and educational level adjusted relative risks.

Results: The adjusted relative CVD risk for the second compared to the first tertile of the need for recovery score was 1.22 (95% CI: 0.49 to 3.04), and for the third compared to the first tertile was 3.16 (95% CI: 1.34 to 7.48). When need for recovery was entered as continuous score, an adjusted relative risk per SD increase of 1.54 (95% CI: 1.15 to 2.03) was found. Additional adjustment for several work related factors as job demands, did not notably change the observed relation between need for recovery and CVD. Moreover, the increased risk for subjects reporting high job demands (1.38 per SD increase; 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.92) decreased substantially after adjustment for need for recovery.

Conclusion: The results show that need for recovery is a strong predictor of subsequent cardiovascular disease and might be an intermediate factor between job stressors and cardiovascular disease.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (132.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Appels A., Falger P. R., Schouten E. G. Vital exhaustion as risk indicator for myocardial infarction in women. J Psychosom Res. 1993 Dec;37(8):881–890. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(93)90177-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Appels A. Mental precursors of myocardial infarction. Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Apr;156:465–471. doi: 10.1192/bjp.156.4.465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Appels A., Mulder P. Excess fatigue as a precursor of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1988 Jul;9(7):758–764. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/9.7.758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Appels A., Otten F. Exhaustion as precursor of cardiac death. Br J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;31(Pt 3):351–356. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb01004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bosma H., Marmot M. G., Hemingway H., Nicholson A. C., Brunner E., Stansfeld S. A. Low job control and risk of coronary heart disease in Whitehall II (prospective cohort) study. BMJ. 1997 Feb 22;314(7080):558–565. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Depue R. A., Monroe S. M. Conceptualization and measurement of human disorder in life stress research: the problem of chronic disturbance. Psychol Bull. 1986 Jan;99(1):36–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Falger P. R., Schouten E. G. Exhaustion, psychological stressors in the work environment, and acute myocardial infarction in adult men. J Psychosom Res. 1992 Dec;36(8):777–786. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(92)90136-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jansen Nicole W. H., Kant I. Jmert, van den Brandt Piet A. Need for recovery in the working population: description and associations with fatigue and psychological distress. Int J Behav Med. 2002;9(4):322–340. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0904_03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kant I. J., Bültmann U., Schröer K. A. P., Beurskens A. J. H. M., Van Amelsvoort L. G. P. M., Swaen G. M. H. An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: the Maastricht Cohort Study. Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 (Suppl 1):i32–i39. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kasl S. V. Measuring job stressors and studying the health impact of the work environment: an epidemiologic commentary. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):390–401. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.3.4.390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kasl S. V. The influence of the work environment on cardiovascular health: a historical, conceptual, and methodological perspective. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996 Jan;1(1):42–56. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.1.1.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kivimäki Mika, Leino-Arjas Päivi, Luukkonen Ritva, Riihimäki Hilkka, Vahtera Jussi, Kirjonen Juhani. Work stress and risk of cardiovascular mortality: prospective cohort study of industrial employees. BMJ. 2002 Oct 19;325(7369):857–857. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7369.857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kristensen T. S. Job stress and cardiovascular disease: a theoretic critical review. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996 Jul;1(3):246–260. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.1.3.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Macleod John, Davey Smith George, Heslop Pauline, Metcalfe Chris, Carroll Douglas, Hart Carole. Psychological stress and cardiovascular disease: empirical demonstration of bias in a prospective observational study of Scottish men. BMJ. 2002 May 25;324(7348):1247–1251. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996 Jan;1(1):27–41. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.1.1.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sihm I., Dehlholm G., Hansen E. S., Gerdes L. U., Faergeman O. The psychosocial work environment of younger men surviving acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1991 Feb;12(2):203–209. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sluiter J. K., Frings-Dresen M. H., van der Beek A. J., Meijman T. F. The relation between work-induced neuroendocrine reactivity and recovery, subjective need for recovery, and health status. J Psychosom Res. 2001 Jan;50(1):29–37. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00213-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sluiter J. K., van der Beek A. J., Frings-Dresen M. H. The influence of work characteristics on the need for recovery and experienced health: a study on coach drivers. Ergonomics. 1999 Apr;42(4):573–583. doi: 10.1080/001401399185487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stansfeld Stephen A., Fuhrer Rebecca, Shipley Martin J., Marmot Michael G. Psychological distress as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in the Whitehall II Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):248–255. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.1.248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Steenland K., Johnson J., Nowlin S. A follow-up study of job strain and heart disease among males in the NHANES1 population. Am J Ind Med. 1997 Feb;31(2):256–260. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199702)31:2<256::aid-ajim16>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Theorell T., Tsutsumi A., Hallquist J., Reuterwall C., Hogstedt C., Fredlund P., Emlund N., Johnson J. V. Decision latitude, job strain, and myocardial infarction: a study of working men in Stockholm. The SHEEP Study Group. Stockholm Heart epidemiology Program. Am J Public Health. 1998 Mar;88(3):382–388. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.3.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES