Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2003 Jun;60(Suppl 1):i62–i70. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i62

Need for recovery from work related fatigue and its role in the development and prediction of subjective health complaints

J Sluiter, E M de Croon, T Meijman, M Frings-Dresen
PMCID: PMC1765724  PMID: 12782749

Abstract

Aims: To present the available empirical evidence for the assumed position of the concept of work related fatigue as: (1) short term effect of the working day; and (2) an intermediate variable between work demands and the development of subjective health complaints and sickness absence.

Methods: Results from six single occupation studies, conducted between 1996 and 2002, are presented. Work demands (working hours, decision latitude, break control/autonomy, and mental, emotional, and physical demands) were assessed through validated scales. Work related fatigue was represented and assessed by means of the need for recovery after working time scale in all studies. Subjective health complaints and duration of sickness absence were quantified with the same instruments in most studies as well. Both cross sectional studies (four) as well as prospective studies (two; up to two years follow up) were performed. Cross sectional data of 3820 workers, in total, were available. Prospective data were accessible for 1200 workers in industry and health care. Models were tested with stepwise multiple regression analyses.

Results: Strong associations between work demands and need for necovery were found in different occupations. The variance explained in need for recovery by work demands, age, and (baseline) need for recovery ranged between 14% and 48% in both types of studies. The amount of explained variance by work demands, age, and (baseline) need for recovery in subjective health complaints ranged between 24% and 58% in the different occupations. The prospective data showed the prognostic value of need for recovery in relation to subjective health complaints (in terms of psychosomatic complaints, emotional exhaustion, or sleep problems) and duration of future sickness absence.

Conclusions: The hypothesised role for work related fatigue as a link in the causal string of events, that is assumed to exist between repeated adverse work demands and the development of work related stress reactions, (psychological) overload and, eventually, health problems, was confirmed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (164.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aaronson N. K., Muller M., Cohen P. D., Essink-Bot M. L., Fekkes M., Sanderman R., Sprangers M. A., te Velde A., Verrips E. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1055–1068. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00097-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Addington A. M., Gallo J. J., Ford D. E., Eaton W. W. Epidemiology of unexplained fatigue and major depression in the community: the Baltimore ECA follow-up, 1981-1994. Psychol Med. 2001 Aug;31(6):1037–1044. doi: 10.1017/s0033291701004214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baigi A., Marklund B., Fridlund B. The association between socio-economic status and chest pain, focusing on self-rated health in a primary health care area of Sweden. Eur J Public Health. 2001 Dec;11(4):420–424. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/11.4.420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173–1182. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beurskens A. J., Bültmann U., Kant I., Vercoulen J. H., Bleijenberg G., Swaen G. M. Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure. Occup Environ Med. 2000 May;57(5):353–357. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.5.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bültmann U., Kant I., van Amelsvoort L. G., van den Brandt P. A., Kasl S. V. Differences in fatigue and psychological distress across occupations: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study of Fatigue at Work. J Occup Environ Med. 2001 Nov;43(11):976–983. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200111000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bültmann Ute, Kant Ijmert, Kasl Stanislav V., Beurskens Anna J. H. M., van den Brandt Piet A. Fatigue and psychological distress in the working population: psychometrics, prevalence, and correlates. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Jun;52(6):445–452. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00228-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eriksen H. R., Olff M., Murison R., Ursin H. The time dimension in stress responses: relevance for survival and health. Psychiatry Res. 1999 Jan 18;85(1):39–50. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(98)00141-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eriksen Hege R., Ursin Holger. Sensitization and subjective health complaints. Scand J Psychol. 2002 Apr;43(2):189–196. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Griffin M. A. Dispositions and work reactions: a multilevel approach. J Appl Psychol. 2001 Dec;86(6):1142–1151. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Karasek R., Brisson C., Kawakami N., Houtman I., Bongers P., Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):322–355. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.3.4.322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kraemer H. C., Stice E., Kazdin A., Offord D., Kupfer D. How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Jun;158(6):848–856. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lundberg Ulf. Psychophysiology of work: stress, gender, endocrine response, and work-related upper extremity disorders. Am J Ind Med. 2002 May;41(5):383–392. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Marmot M., Ryff C. D., Bumpass L. L., Shipley M., Marks N. F. Social inequalities in health: next questions and converging evidence. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(6):901–910. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00194-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McEwen B. S. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 15;338(3):171–179. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801153380307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McEwen B. S. The neurobiology of stress: from serendipity to clinical relevance. Brain Res. 2000 Dec 15;886(1-2):172–189. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02950-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mejman T. F., Mulders H. P., Kompier M. A., van Dormolen M. Individual differences in adrenaline/noradrenaline reactivity and self-perceived health status. Z Gesamte Hyg. 1990 Aug;36(8):413–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Niedhammer I., Goldberg M., Leclerc A., Bugel I., David S. Psychosocial factors at work and subsequent depressive symptoms in the Gazel cohort. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998 Jun;24(3):197–205. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sluiter J. K., Frings-Dresen M. H., Meijman T. F., van der Beek A. J. Reactivity and recovery from different types of work measured by catecholamines and cortisol: a systematic literature overview. Occup Environ Med. 2000 May;57(5):298–315. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.5.298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sluiter J. K., Frings-Dresen M. H., van der Beek A. J., Meijman T. F. The relation between work-induced neuroendocrine reactivity and recovery, subjective need for recovery, and health status. J Psychosom Res. 2001 Jan;50(1):29–37. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00213-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sluiter J. K., van der Beek A. J., Frings-Dresen M. H. The influence of work characteristics on the need for recovery and experienced health: a study on coach drivers. Ergonomics. 1999 Apr;42(4):573–583. doi: 10.1080/001401399185487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sluiter J. K., van der Beek A. J., Frings-Dresen M. H. Work stress and recovery measured by urinary catecholamines and cortisol excretion in long distance coach drivers. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Jun;55(6):407–413. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.6.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Spector P. E., Chen P. Y., O'Connell B. J. A longitudinal study of relations between job stressors and job strains while controlling for prior negative affectivity and strains. J Appl Psychol. 2000 Apr;85(2):211–218. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stansfeld Stephen A., Fuhrer Rebecca, Shipley Martin J., Marmot Michael G. Psychological distress as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in the Whitehall II Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):248–255. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.1.248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ursin H., Eriksen H. R. Sensitization, subjective health complaints, and sustained arousal. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Mar;933:119–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05819.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ursin H. Psychosomatic medicine: state of the art. Ann Med. 2000 Jul;32(5):323–328. doi: 10.3109/07853890008995934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. de Croon E. M., Blonk R. W. B., de Zwart B. C. H., Frings-Dresen M. H. W., Broersen J. P. J. Job stress, fatigue, and job dissatisfaction in Dutch lorry drivers: towards an occupation specific model of job demands and control. Occup Environ Med. 2002 Jun;59(6):356–361. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.6.356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES