Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2003 Jun;60(Suppl 1):i88–i92. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i88

Fatigue as a risk factor for being injured in an occupational accident: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study

G Swaen, L G P M van Amelsvoort, U Bultmann, I Kant
PMCID: PMC1765730  PMID: 12782753

Abstract

Aims: To determine whether fatigue and need for recovery are risk factors for being injured in an occupational accident.

Methods: These associations were investigated within the Maastricht Cohort Study of "Fatigue at Work", a prospective cohort study of employees from a wide range of companies and organisations. For 7051 employees information was available on fatigue as measured with the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS), need for recovery as measured with the VBBA, and possible confounding factors such as age, smoking, alcohol consumption, educational level, shift work, and work environment. Information on the risk factors was collected in May 1999 and January 2000, before the occurrence of the occupational accidents. The incidence of being injured in an occupational accident was inventoried over the year 2000. A total of 108 employees reported having been injured in an occupational accident in 2000.

Results: For the highest CIS fatigue score tertile a for age, gender, educational level, smoking, shift work, and work environment, adjusted relative risk for being injured in an occupational accident of 1.29 (95% CI: 1.03 to 2.78) was found compared to the lowest tertile, and for the highest tertile of need for recovery a relative risk of 2.28 (95% CI: 1.41 to 3.66) was found.

Conclusions: Fatigue and need for recovery were found to be independent risk factors for being injured in an occupational accident. This means that in the push back of occupational accidents, fatigue, and even more importantly need for recovery, need special attention.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (104.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burdorf A., Sorock G. S., Herrick R. F., Courtney T. K. Advancing epidemiologic studies of occupational injury--approaches and future directions. Am J Ind Med. 1997 Aug;32(2):180–183. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<180::aid-ajim8>3.0.co;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bültmann U., de Vries M., Beurskens A. J., Bleijenberg G., Vercoulen J. H., Kant I. Measurement of prolonged fatigue in the working population: determination of a cutoff point for the checklist individual strength. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Oct;5(4):411–416. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.5.4.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chipman M. L. Risk factors for injury: similarities and differences for traffic crashes and other causes. Accid Anal Prev. 1995 Oct;27(5):699–706. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(95)00013-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis R. M., Pless B. BMJ bans "accidents". BMJ. 2001 Jun 2;322(7298):1320–1321. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Frank A. L. Injuries related to shiftwork. Am J Prev Med. 2000 May;18(4 Suppl):33–36. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00139-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Frone M. R. Predictors of work injuries among employed adolescents. J Appl Psychol. 1998 Aug;83(4):565–576. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hsiao H., Simeonov P. Preventing falls from roofs: a critical review. Ergonomics. 2001 Apr 15;44(5):537–561. doi: 10.1080/00140130110034480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kant I. J., Bültmann U., Schröer K. A. P., Beurskens A. J. H. M., Van Amelsvoort L. G. P. M., Swaen G. M. H. An epidemiological approach to study fatigue in the working population: the Maastricht Cohort Study. Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 (Suppl 1):i32–i39. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Laflamme L., Menckel E., Lundholm L. The age-related risk of occupational accidents: the case of Swedish iron-ore miners. Accid Anal Prev. 1996 May;28(3):349–357. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(96)00001-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Leistikow B. N., Martin D. C., Jacobs J., Rocke D. M., Noderer K. Smoking as a risk factor for accident death: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Accid Anal Prev. 2000 May;32(3):397–405. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00034-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lewis G., Wessely S. The epidemiology of fatigue: more questions than answers. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Apr;46(2):92–97. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.2.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sluiter J. K., Frings-Dresen M. H., van der Beek A. J., Meijman T. F. The relation between work-induced neuroendocrine reactivity and recovery, subjective need for recovery, and health status. J Psychosom Res. 2001 Jan;50(1):29–37. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00213-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Veazie M. A., Landen D. D., Bender T. R., Amandus H. E. Epidemiologic research on the etiology of injuries at work. Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:203–221. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.15.050194.001223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vercoulen J. H., Swanink C. M., Zitman F. G., Vreden S. G., Hoofs M. P., Fennis J. F., Galama J. M., van der Meer J. W., Bleijenberg G. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of fluoxetine in chronic fatigue syndrome. Lancet. 1996 Mar 30;347(9005):858–861. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91345-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wells S., Macdonald S. The relationship between alcohol consumption patterns and car, work, sports and home accidents for different age groups. Accid Anal Prev. 1999 Nov;31(6):663–665. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00025-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES