Skip to main content
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2003 Dec;12(Suppl 2):ii51–ii57. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii51

Video techniques and data compared with observation in emergency trauma care

C Mackenzie, Y Xiao
PMCID: PMC1765775  PMID: 14645896

Abstract

Video recording is underused in improving patient safety and understanding performance shaping factors in patient care. We report our experience of using video recording techniques in a trauma centre, including how to gain cooperation of clinicians for video recording of their workplace performance, identify strengths of video compared with observation, and suggest processes for consent and maintenance of confidentiality of video records. Video records are a rich source of data for documenting clinician performance which reveal safety and systems issues not identified by observation. Emergency procedures and video records of critical events identified patient safety, clinical, quality assurance, systems failures, and ergonomic issues. Video recording is a powerful feedback and training tool and provides a reusable record of events that can be repeatedly reviewed and used as research data. It allows expanded analyses of time critical events, trauma resuscitation, anaesthesia, and surgical tasks. To overcome some of the key obstacles in deploying video recording techniques, researchers should (1) develop trust with video recorded subjects, (2) obtain clinician participation for introduction of a new protocol or line of investigation, (3) report aggregated video recorded data and use clinician reviews for feedback on covert processes and cognitive analyses, and (4) involve multidisciplinary experts in medicine and nursing.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (265.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Byrne A. J., Sellen A. J., Jones J. G., Aitkenhead A. R., Hussain S., Gilder F., Smith H. L., Ribes P. Effect of videotape feedback on anaesthetists' performance while managing simulated anaesthetic crises: a multicentre study. Anaesthesia. 2002 Feb;57(2):176–179. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02361.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caplan E. S., Hoyt N. J., Rodriguez A., Cowley R. A. Empyema occurring in the multiply traumatized patient. J Trauma. 1984 Sep;24(9):785–789. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198409000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carbine D. N., Finer N. N., Knodel E., Rich W. Video recording as a means of evaluating neonatal resuscitation performance. Pediatrics. 2000 Oct;106(4):654–658. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.4.654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mackenzie C. F., Jefferies N. J., Hunter W. A., Bernhard W. N., Xiao Y. Comparison of self-reporting of deficiencies in airway management with video analyses of actual performance. LOTAS Group. Level One Trauma Anesthesia Simulation. Hum Factors. 1996 Dec;38(4):623–635. doi: 10.1518/001872096778827297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Seagull F. J., Sanderson P. M. Anesthesia alarms in context: an observational study. Hum Factors. 2001 Spring;43(1):66–78. doi: 10.1518/001872001775992453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Xiao Y., Hunter W. A., Mackenzie C. F., Jefferies N. J., Horst R. L. Task complexity in emergency medical care and its implications for team coordination. LOTAS Group. Level One Trauma Anesthesia Simulation. Hum Factors. 1996 Dec;38(4):636–645. doi: 10.1518/001872096778827206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES