Skip to main content
PMC home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2004 Oct;13(Suppl 1):i46–i50. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.009803

Using standardised patients in an objective structured clinical examination as a patient safety tool

J Battles, S Wilkinson, S Lee
PMCID: PMC1765798  PMID: 15465955

Abstract

Standardised patients (SPs) are a powerful form of simulation that has now become commonplace in training and assessment in medical education throughout the world. Standardised patients are individuals, with or without actual disease, who have been trained to portray a medical case in a consistent manner. They are now the gold standard for measuring the competence of physicians and other health professionals, and the quality of their practice. A common way in which SPs are used in performance assessment has been as part of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). The use of an SP based OSCE can be a powerful tool in measuring continued competence in human reliability and skill performance where such skills are a critical attribute to maintaining patient safety. This article will describe how an OSCE could be used as a patient safety tool based on cases derived from actual events related to postdonation information in the blood collection process. The OSCE was developed as a competency examination for health history takers. Postdonation information events in the blood collection process account for the majority of errors reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. SP based assessment is an important patient safety tool that could be applied to a variety of patient safety settings and situations, and should be considered an important weapon in the war on medical error and patient harm.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (73.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Battles J. B., Carpenter J. L., McIntire D. D., Wagner J. M. Analyzing and adjusting for variables in a large-scale standardized-patient examination. Acad Med. 1994 May;69(5):370–376. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199405000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Battles J. B., Kaplan H. S., Van der Schaaf T. W., Shea C. E. The attributes of medical event-reporting systems: experience with a prototype medical event-reporting system for transfusion medicine. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Mar;122(3):231–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Battles J. B., Lilford R. J. Organizing patient safety research to identify risks and hazards. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12 (Suppl 2):ii2–ii7. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Battles J. B., Shea C. E. A system of analyzing medical errors to improve GME curricula and programs. Acad Med. 2001 Feb;76(2):125–133. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200102000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Colliver J. A., Swartz M. H. Assessing clinical performance with standardized patients. JAMA. 1997 Sep 3;278(9):790–791. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.9.790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Colliver J. A., Williams R. G. Technical issues: test application. AAMC. Acad Med. 1993 Jun;68(6):454–463. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199306000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harden R. M., Stevenson M., Downie W. W., Wilson G. M. Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J. 1975 Feb 22;1(5955):447–451. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5955.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee Stacy J., Wilkinson Susan L., Battles James B., Hynan Linda S. An objective structured clinical examination to evaluate health historian competencies. Transfusion. 2003 Jan;43(1):34–41. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00275.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marconi M., Almini D., Pizzi M. N., Riccardi D., Bergamaschi W., Giovanetti A. M., Rebulla P., Sirchia G. Quality assurance of clinical transfusion practice by implementation of the privilege of blood prescription and computerized prospective audit of blood requests. Transfus Med. 1996 Mar;6(1):11–19. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.1996.d01-48.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McClelland D. B., McMenamin J. J., Moores H. M., Barbara J. A. Reducing risks in blood transfusion: process and outcome. Transfus Med. 1996 Mar;6(1):1–10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.1996.d01-47.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murphy W. G., McClelland D. B. Deceptively low morbidity from failure to practice safe blood transfusion: an analysis of serious blood transfusion errors. Vox Sang. 1989;57(1):59–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1989.tb04985.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Norman G. R., Neufeld V. R., Walsh A., Woodward C. A., McConvey G. A. Measuring physicians' performances by using simulated patients. J Med Educ. 1985 Dec;60(12):925–934. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198512000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Peabody J. W., Luck J., Glassman P., Dresselhaus T. R., Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000 Apr 5;283(13):1715–1722. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.13.1715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stillman P. L. Technical issues: logistics. AAMC. Acad Med. 1993 Jun;68(6):464–470. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199306000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vincent C., Taylor-Adams S., Chapman E. J., Hewett D., Prior S., Strange P., Tizzard A. How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: clinical risk unit and association of litigation and risk management protocol. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):777–781. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES