Abstract
In analysing the safety strategies of organisations successfully managing hazardous systems it is apparent that safety itself is a problematic, and even risky, concept. It is less the valuation of safety per se than the disvalue surrounding mis-specification, misidentification, and misunderstanding that drives reliability in these organisations. Two contrasting models of high reliability can be identified in precluded event and resilience focused organisations. Each model is adapted to different properties in the raw material, process variances, and knowledge base of the organisation. These two models bound the reliability approaches available to medicine. The implications of each for medical reliability strategy are explored, and the possible adaptation of features from each for medical organisations are assessed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (69.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Carthey J., de Leval M. R., Reason J. T. Institutional resilience in healthcare systems. Qual Health Care. 2001 Mar;10(1):29–32. doi: 10.1136/qhc.10.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cook R. I., Render M., Woods D. D. Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):791–794. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]