Skip to main content
Sexually Transmitted Infections logoLink to Sexually Transmitted Infections
. 2004 Dec;80(Suppl 2):ii49–ii56. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.011924

"A bit more truthful": the validity of adolescent sexual behaviour data collected in rural northern Tanzania using five methods

M Plummer, D Ross, D Wight, J Changalucha, G Mshana, J Wamoyi, J Todd, A Anemona, F Mosha, A Obasi, R Hayes
PMCID: PMC1765853  PMID: 15572640

Abstract

Objective: To assess the validity of sexual behaviour data collected from African adolescents using five methods.

Methods: 9280 Tanzanian adolescents participated in a biological marker and face to face questionnaire survey and 6079 in an assisted self-completion questionnaire survey; 74 participated in in-depth interviews and 56 person weeks of participant observation were conducted.

Results: 38% of males and 59% of females reporting sexual activity did so in only one of the two 1998 questionnaires. Only 58% of males and 29% of females with biological markers consistently reported sexual activity in both questionnaires. Nine of 11 (82%) in-depth interview respondents who had had biological markers provided an invalid series of responses about sex in the survey and in-depth interview series. Only one of six female in-depth interview respondents with an STI reported sex in any of the four surveys, but five reported it in the in-depth interviews.

Conclusion: In this low prevalence population, biological markers on their own revealed that a few adolescents had had sex, but in combination with in-depth interviews they may be useful in identifying risk factors for STIs. Self-reported sexual behaviour data were fraught with inconsistencies. In-depth interviews seem to be more effective than assisted self-completion questionnaires and face to face questionnaires in promoting honest responses among females with STIs. Participant observation was the most useful method for understanding the nature, complexity, and extent of sexual behaviour.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (88.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fenton K. A., Johnson A. M., McManus S., Erens B. Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research. Sex Transm Infect. 2001 Apr;77(2):84–92. doi: 10.1136/sti.77.2.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fishbein M., Pequegnat W. Evaluating AIDS prevention interventions using behavioral and biological outcome measures. Sex Transm Dis. 2000 Feb;27(2):101–110. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200002000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lambert H. Methods and meanings in anthropological, epidemiological and clinical encounters: the case of sexually transmitted disease and human immunodeficiency virus control and prevention in India. Trop Med Int Health. 1998 Dec;3(12):1002–1010. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00336.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Peeling R. W., Toye B., Jessamine P., Gemmill I. Pooling of urine specimens for PCR testing: a cost saving strategy for Chlamydia trachomatis control programmes. Sex Transm Infect. 1998 Feb;74(1):66–70. doi: 10.1136/sti.74.1.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Plummer Mary L., Wight Daniel, Ross David A., Balira Rebecca, Anemona Alessandra, Todd Jim, Salamba Zachayo, Obasi Angela I. N., Grosskurth Heiner, Changalunga John. Asking semi-literate adolescents about sexual behaviour: the validity of assisted self-completion questionnaire (ASCQ) data in rural Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2004 Jun;9(6):737–754. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01254.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ross D. A., Vaughan J. P. Health interview surveys in developing countries: a methodological review. Stud Fam Plann. 1986 Mar-Apr;17(2):78–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schachter J., Chow J. M. The fallibility of diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted diseases: the impact of behavioral and epidemiologic studies. Sex Transm Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(3):191–196. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199505000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Seal D. W., Bloom F. R., Somlai A. M. Dilemmas in conducting qualitative sex research in applied field settings. Health Educ Behav. 2000 Feb;27(1):10–23. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Todd J., Changalucha J., Ross D. A., Mosha F., Obasi A. I. N., Plummer M., Balira R., Grosskurth H., Mabey D. C. W., Hayes R. The sexual health of pupils in years 4 to 6 of primary schools in rural Tanzania. Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Feb;80(1):35–42. doi: 10.1136/sti.2003.005413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wight D., West P. Poor recall, misunderstandings and embarrassment: interpreting discrepancies in young men's reported heterosexual behaviour. Cult Health Sex. 1999 Jan-Mar;1(1):55–78. doi: 10.1080/136910599301166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES