Skip to main content
PMC home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2001 Dec;10(Suppl 1):i24–i32. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.suppl_1.i24

Effect of health messages about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes on beliefs and quitting intent

S Shiffman, J Pillitteri, S Burton, J Rohay, J Gitchell
PMCID: PMC1766048  PMID: 11740041

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To test the impact of three health messages focusing on vent holes, sensory effects of Light and Ultra Light cigarettes, or health consequences of smoking, respectively, on beliefs and quitting intentions.
DESIGN—In the course of a random digit dialed telephone survey, subjects were randomised to hear one of three messages. To test the effects of the messages, beliefs and quitting intentions were assessed both pre- and post-message.
PARTICIPANTS—Daily smokers (n = 2120) of Regular (46%), Light (39%), and Ultra Light (15%) cigarettes in the USA. The sample was weighted to match the US smoker population on age, sex, and ethnicity.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Beliefs were summarised on three dimensions: Safety (reduced health risk), Delivery (lower tar and nicotine delivery), and Sensation (less harsh). Quitting interest was captured by the "quit index", an aggregate measure of quitting interest and intent.
RESULTS—The message focusing on smokers' sensory perceptions of Light and Ultra Light cigarettes resulted in the most positive change in beliefs about safety, delivery, and intent to quit, and was particularly effective among those who believed that these cigarettes were less harsh. The effect was most pronounced among young adults, and among smokers of Light and Ultra Light brands who most endorsed their sensory benefits.
CONCLUSIONS—Addressing smokers' sensory experience that Light and Ultra Light cigarettes feel less harsh may be a promising strategy for changing their misconceptions about these cigarettes and enhancing their interest in quitting. Media counter-advertising on Lights and Ultra Lights, focusing on sensory aspects of these cigarettes, may be an important part of tobacco control efforts.


Keywords: Light; Ultra Light; smokers' beliefs; health messages; vent holes

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (218.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Biener L., Abrams D. B. The Contemplation Ladder: validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 1991;10(5):360–365. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.10.5.360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DiClemente C. C., Prochaska J. O., Fairhurst S. K., Velicer W. F., Velasquez M. M., Rossi J. S. The process of smoking cessation: an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Apr;59(2):295–304. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.2.295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Djordjevic M. V., Stellman S. D., Zang E. Doses of nicotine and lung carcinogens delivered to cigarette smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jan 19;92(2):106–111. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.2.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Farkas A. J., Pierce J. P., Zhu S. H., Rosbrook B., Gilpin E. A., Berry C., Kaplan R. M. Addiction versus stages of change models in predicting smoking cessation. Addiction. 1996 Sep;91(9):1271–1292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hecht S. S. Tobacco smoke carcinogens and lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Jul 21;91(14):1194–1210. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.14.1194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kozlowski L. T., Goldberg M. E., Sweeney C. T., Palmer R. F., Pillitteri J. L., Yost B. A., White E. L., Stine M. M. Smoker reactions to a "radio message" that Light cigarettes are as dangerous as Regular cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999 Mar;1(1):67–76. doi: 10.1080/14622299050011171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kozlowski L. T., Goldberg M. E., Yost B. A., Ahern F. M., Aronson K. R., Sweeney C. T. Smokers are unaware of the filter vents now on most cigarettes: results of a national survey. Tob Control. 1996 Winter;5(4):265–270. doi: 10.1136/tc.5.4.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kozlowski L. T., Goldberg M. E., Yost B. A., White E. L., Sweeney C. T., Pillitteri J. L. Smokers' misperceptions of light and ultra-light cigarettes may keep them smoking. Am J Prev Med. 1998 Jul;15(1):9–16. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00004-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kozlowski L. T., Yost B., Stine M. M., Celebucki C. Massachusetts' advertising against light cigarettes appears to change beliefs and behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2000 May;18(4):339–342. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00125-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shiffman S., Pillitteri J. L., Burton S. L., Rohay J. M., Gitchell J. G. Smokers' beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes. Tob Control. 2001;10 (Suppl 1):i17–i23. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.suppl_1.i17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Silverstein B., Feld S., Kozlowski L. T. The availability of low-nicotine cigarettes as a cause of cigarette smoking among teenage females. J Health Soc Behav. 1980 Dec;21(4):383–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES