Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2002 Mar;11(Suppl 1):i5–i17. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i5

Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents

K Cummings, C Morley, J Horan, C Steger, N Leavell
PMCID: PMC1766057  PMID: 11893810

Abstract

Design: The data for this study come from tobacco industry documents collected from the tobacco industry's document websites, presently linked at http://www.tobaccoarchives.com. The websites were searched using "request for production" (RFP) codes, specified keyword searches, and serendipitous terms identified in document citations found with RFP and keyword searches.

Results: Industry documents show that the cigarette manufacturers carefully monitored the smoking habits of teenagers over the past several decades. Candid quotes from industry executives refer to youth as a source of sales and as fundamental to the survival of the tobacco industry. The documents reveal that the features of cigarette brands (that is, use of filters, low tar, bland taste, etc), packaging (that is, size, colour and design), and advertising (that is, media placements and themes and imagery) were developed specifically to appeal to new smokers (that is, teenagers). Evidence also indicates that relevant youth oriented marketing documents may have been destroyed and that the language used in some of the more recent documents may have been sanitised to cover up efforts to market to youth.

Conclusions: The tobacco industry's internal documents reveal an undeniable interest in marketing cigarettes to underage smokers. The industry's marketing approaches run counter to and predicate methods for tobacco prevention: (1) keep the price of the product high; (2) keep product placements and advertising away from schools and other areas with a high volume of youth traffic; (3) make cigarette advertising (that is, themes and visual images) unappealing to youth; (4) make product packaging unappealing to youth; and (5) design the product so it is not easy to inhale.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (226.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chaloupka F. J., Cummings K. M., Morley C. P., Horan J. K. Tax, price and cigarette smoking: evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I62–I72. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cummings K. M., Hyland A., Lewit E., Shopland D. Discrepancies in cigarette brand sales and adult market share: are new teen smokers filling the gap? Tob Control. 1997;6 (Suppl 2):S38–S43. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.suppl_2.s38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DiFranza J. R., Godshall W. T. Tobacco industry efforts hindering enforcement of the ban on tobacco sales to minors: actions speak louder than words. Tob Control. 1996 Summer;5(2):127–131. doi: 10.1136/tc.5.2.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Distefan J. M., Gilpin E. A., Sargent J. D., Pierce J. P. Do movie stars encourage adolescents to start smoking? Evidence from California. Prev Med. 1999 Jan;28(1):1–11. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Katz S. K., Lavack A. M. Tobacco related bar promotions: insights from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I92–101. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. King C., 3rd, Siegel M. Brand-specific cigarette advertising in magazines in relation to youth and young adult readership, 1986-1994. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999 Dec;1(4):331–340. doi: 10.1080/14622299050011461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. King C., 3rd, Siegel M. The Master Settlement Agreement with the tobacco industry and cigarette advertising in magazines. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 16;345(7):504–511. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa003149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mahood G. Warnings that tell the truth: breaking new ground in Canada. Tob Control. 1999 Winter;8(4):356–361. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.4.356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Malone R. E., Balbach E. D. Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire? Tob Control. 2000 Sep;9(3):334–338. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.3.334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pierce J. P., Choi W. S., Gilpin E. A., Farkas A. J., Berry C. C. Tobacco industry promotion of cigarettes and adolescent smoking. JAMA. 1998 Feb 18;279(7):511–515. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.7.511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pollay R. W., Dewhirst T. The dark side of marketing seemingly "Light" cigarettes: successful images and failed fact. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I18–I31. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pollay R. W. Targeting youth and concerned smokers: evidence from Canadian tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2000 Jun;9(2):136–147. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.2.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sargent J. D., Dalton M., Beach M., Bernhardt A., Heatherton T., Stevens M. Effect of cigarette promotions on smoking uptake among adolescents. Prev Med. 2000 Apr;30(4):320–327. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wayne G. Ferris, Connolly G. N. How cigarette design can affect youth initiation into smoking: Camel cigarettes 1983-93. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I32–I39. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES