Skip to main content
PMC home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2002 Mar;11(Suppl 1):i73–i80. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i73

The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents

M Wakefield, C Morley, J Horan, K Cummings
PMCID: PMC1766062  PMID: 11893817

Abstract

Methods: A search of tobacco company document sites using a list of specified search terms was undertaken during November 2000 to July 2001.

Results: Documents show that, especially in the context of tighter restrictions on conventional avenues for tobacco marketing, tobacco companies view cigarette packaging as an integral component of marketing strategy and a vehicle for (a) creating significant in-store presence at the point of purchase, and (b) communicating brand image. Market testing results indicate that such imagery is so strong as to influence smoker's taste ratings of the same cigarettes when packaged differently. Documents also reveal the careful balancing act that companies have employed in using pack design and colour to communicate the impression of lower tar or milder cigarettes, while preserving perceived taste and "satisfaction". Systematic and extensive research is carried out by tobacco companies to ensure that cigarette packaging appeals to selected target groups, including young adults and women.

Conclusions: Cigarette pack design is an important communication device for cigarette brands and acts as an advertising medium. Many smokers are misled by pack design into thinking that cigarettes may be "safer". There is a need to consider regulation of cigarette packaging.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (159.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beede P., Lawson R. The effect of plain packages on the perception of cigarette health warnings. Public Health. 1992 Jul;106(4):315–322. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80425-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borland R., Hill D. The path to Australia's tobacco health warnings. Addiction. 1997 Sep;92(9):1151–1157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borland R. Tobacco health warnings and smoking-related cognitions and behaviours. Addiction. 1997 Nov;92(11):1427–1435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chaloupka F., Slater S., Wakefield M. USA: price cuts and point of sale ads follow tax rise. Tob Control. 1999 Autumn;8(3):242–242. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.3.242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cummings K. M., Hyland A., Lewit E., Shopland D. Discrepancies in cigarette brand sales and adult market share: are new teen smokers filling the gap? Tob Control. 1997;6 (Suppl 2):S38–S43. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.suppl_2.s38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hastings G., MacFadyen L. A day in the life of an advertising man: review of internal documents from the UK tobacco industry's principal advertising agencies. BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):366–371. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kozlowski L. T., Palmer R., Stine M. M., Strasser A. A., Yost B. A. Persistent effects of a message counter-marketing light cigarettes: results of a randomized controlled trial. Addict Behav. 2001 May-Jun;26(3):447–452. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00111-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kozlowski L. T., Yost B., Stine M. M., Celebucki C. Massachusetts' advertising against light cigarettes appears to change beliefs and behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2000 May;18(4):339–342. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00125-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mahood G. Warnings that tell the truth: breaking new ground in Canada. Tob Control. 1999 Winter;8(4):356–361. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.4.356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pollay R. W., Dewhirst T. The dark side of marketing seemingly "Light" cigarettes: successful images and failed fact. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I18–I31. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pollay R. W. Targeting youth and concerned smokers: evidence from Canadian tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2000 Jun;9(2):136–147. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.2.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Saffer H., Chaloupka F. The effect of tobacco advertising bans on tobacco consumption. J Health Econ. 2000 Nov;19(6):1117–1137. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00054-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Slade J. The pack as advertisement. Tob Control. 1997 Autumn;6(3):169–170. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.3.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Slater S., Chaloupka F. J., Wakefield M. State variation in retail promotions and advertising for Marlboro cigarettes. Tob Control. 2001 Dec;10(4):337–339. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.4.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES