Abstract
Methods: Data for this study come from tobacco industry documents contained in the Youth and Marketing database created by the Roswell Park Cancer Institute and available through http:// roswell.tobaccodocuments.org, supplemented with documents obtained from http://www.tobaccodocuments.org.
Results: Tobacco company documents provide clear evidence on the impact of cigarette prices on cigarette smoking, describing how tax related and other price increases lead to significant reductions in smoking, particularly among young persons. This information was very important in developing the industry's pricing strategies, including the development of lower price branded generics and the pass through of cigarette excise tax increases, and in developing a variety of price related marketing efforts, including multi-pack discounts, couponing, and others.
Conclusions: Pricing and price related promotions are among the most important marketing tools employed by tobacco companies. Future tobacco control efforts that aim to raise prices and limit price related marketing efforts are likely to be important in achieving reductions in tobacco use and the public health toll caused by tobacco.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (254.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cummings K. M., Morley C. P., Horan J. K., Steger C., Leavell N-R. Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I5–17. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grossman M., Chaloupka F. J. Cigarette taxes. The straw to break the camel's back. Public Health Rep. 1997 Jul-Aug;112(4):290–297. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malone R. E., Balbach E. D. Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire? Tob Control. 2000 Sep;9(3):334–338. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.3.334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saffer H., Chaloupka F. The effect of tobacco advertising bans on tobacco consumption. J Health Econ. 2000 Nov;19(6):1117–1137. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00054-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slater S., Chaloupka F. J., Wakefield M. State variation in retail promotions and advertising for Marlboro cigarettes. Tob Control. 2001 Dec;10(4):337–339. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.4.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]