Abstract
Design: Analysis used a pre/post-quasi-experimental design that compared town meals tax receipts before and after the imposition of highly restrictive restaurant smoking policies in adopting versus non-adopting communities. The effect of restaurant smoking policies was estimated using a fixed effects regression model, entering a panel of 84 months of data for the 239 towns in the study. A separate model estimated the effect of restaurant smoking policies on establishments that served alcohol.
Main outcome measure: Change in the trend in meals tax revenue (adjusted for population) following the implementation of highly restrictive restaurant smoking policies.
Results: The local adoption of restrictive restaurant smoking policies did not lead to a measurable deviation from the strong positive trend in revenue between 1992 and 1998 that restaurants in Massachusetts experienced. Controlling for other less restrictive restaurant smoking policies did not change this finding. Similar results were found for only those establishments that served alcoholic beverages.
Conclusions: Highly restrictive restaurant smoking policies do not have a significant effect on a community's level of meal receipts, indicating that claims of community wide restaurant business decline under such policies are unwarranted.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (103.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bartosch W. J., Pope G. C. The economic effect of smoke-free restaurant policies on restaurant business in Massachusetts. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):53–62. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Biener L., Siegel M. Behavior intentions of the public after bans on smoking in restaurants and bars. Am J Public Health. 1997 Dec;87(12):2042–2044. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.12.2042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellis G. A., Hobart R. L., Reed D. F. Overcoming a powerful tobacco lobby in enacting local smoking ordinances: the Contra Costa County experience. J Public Health Policy. 1996;17(1):28–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glantz S. A., Charlesworth A. Tourism and hotel revenues before and after passage of smoke-free restaurant ordinances. JAMA. 1999 May 26;281(20):1911–1918. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.20.1911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glantz S. A., Smith L. R. The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants and bars on revenues: a follow-up. Am J Public Health. 1997 Oct;87(10):1687–1693. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.10.1687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glantz S. A., Smith L. R. The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants on restaurant sales. Am J Public Health. 1994 Jul;84(7):1081–1085. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.7.1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hyland A., Cummings K. M., Nauenberg E. Analysis of taxable sales receipts: was New York City's Smoke-Free Air Act bad for restaurant business? J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):14–21. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobson P. D., Wasserman J., Raube K. The politics of antismoking legislation. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993 Winter;18(4):787–819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samuels B. E., Begay M. E., Hazan A. R., Glantz S. A. Philip Morris's failed experiment in Pittsburgh. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1992 Summer;17(2):329–351. doi: 10.1215/03616878-17-2-329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samuels B., Glantz S. A. The politics of local tobacco control. JAMA. 1991 Oct 16;266(15):2110–2117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sciacca J. P., Ratliff M. I. Prohibiting smoking in restaurants: effects on restaurant sales. Am J Health Promot. 1998 Jan-Feb;12(3):176–184. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.3.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Traynor M. P., Begay M. E., Glantz S. A. New tobacco industry strategy to prevent local tobacco control. JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):479–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]