Skip to main content
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2003 Dec;12(Suppl 3):iii7–iii12. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii7

"Some convincing arguments to pass back to nervous customers": the role of the tobacco retailer in the Australian tobacco industry's smoker reassurance campaign 1950–1978

A Tofler, S Chapman
PMCID: PMC1766116  PMID: 14645943

Abstract

Background: Epidemiological studies and reports on smoking and health published in the 1950s and 1960s threatened the tobacco industry worldwide, which acted to reassure smokers and counteract mounting evidence that smoking posed a serious risk to smokers' health.

Objective: To document the use of tobacco retailers (1) as a conduit to pass messages of reassurance onto smokers, and (2) to recruit youth and women into smoking.

Methods: Review of an extensive collection of Australian tobacco retail trade journals (1950–1978) for articles consistent with the industry's efforts to counter messages about smoking and health, and how to attract non-smokers, particularly youth and women.

Results: The main arguments advanced in the journals included the notion that air pollution and other substances cause cancer, that "statistics" did not constitute proof in the tobacco health scare, and that the industry was committed to research into the causes of cancer and into developing a "safer" cigarette.

Conclusions: Numerous articles designed to be reiterated to customers were published, arguing against the link between tobacco and ill health. Tobacco retailers, salesmen and retail trade organisations played a significant role in dissembling the tobacco health nexus. Tobacco retail journals may be an important component in tobacco industry misinformation strategies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (189.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bero L., Barnes D. E., Hanauer P., Slade J., Glantz S. A. Lawyer control of the tobacco industry's external research program. The Brown and Williamson documents. JAMA. 1995 Jul 19;274(3):241–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carter S. M. Going below the line: creating transportable brands for Australia's dark market. Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12 (Suppl 3):iii87–iii94. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapman S., Rubinstein P. Smokers' beliefs about smoking and health. Med J Aust. 1987 May 4;146(9):502–503. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1987.tb120375.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chapman S., Wong W. L., Smith W. Self-exempting beliefs about smoking and health: differences between smokers and ex-smokers. Am J Public Health. 1993 Feb;83(2):215–219. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.2.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cummings K. M., Morley C. P., Hyland A. Failed promises of the cigarette industry and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I110–I117. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DOLL R., HILL A. B. Smoking and carcinoma of the lung; preliminary report. Br Med J. 1950 Sep 30;2(4682):739–748. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4682.739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Francey N., Chapman S. "Operation Berkshire": the international tobacco companies' conspiracy. BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):371–374. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. WYNDER E. L., GRAHAM E. A. Tobacco smoking as a possible etiologic factor in bronchiogenic carcinoma; a study of 684 proved cases. J Am Med Assoc. 1950 May 27;143(4):329–336. doi: 10.1001/jama.1950.02910390001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES