Abstract
Objective: To document the development of the low tar harm reduction programme in Australia, including tobacco industry responses.
Data sources: Tobacco industry documents, retail tobacco journals, newspapers, medical journals, and Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria (ACCV) newsletters and archival records.
Study selection: Documents on the strategies and knowledge bases of the ACCV, other Australian health authorities, and the tobacco industry.
Results: The ACCV built a durable system for measuring and publicising the tar and nicotine yields of Australian cigarettes and influencing their development. The tobacco industry initially sought to block the development of this system but later appeared to cooperate with it, as is evidenced by the current market dominance of low tar brands. However, behind the scenes, the industry used its substantial knowledge advantage regarding compensatory smoking and its ability to re-engineer cigarettes to gain effective control of the system and subvert the ACCV's objectives.
Conclusions: Replacement of the low tar programme with new means of minimising the harms from cigarette smoking should be a policy priority for the Australian government. This will require regulation, rather than further voluntary agreements, and stringent monitoring of successor programmes will be necessary.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (385.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Djordjevic M. V., Fan J., Ferguson S., Hoffmann D. Self-regulation of smoking intensity. Smoke yields of the low-nicotine, low-'tar' cigarettes. Carcinogenesis. 1995 Sep;16(9):2015–2021. doi: 10.1093/carcin/16.9.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Djordjevic M. V., Hoffmann D., Hoffmann I. Nicotine regulates smoking patterns. Prev Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;26(4):435–440. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray N., Kozlowski L. T. More on the regulation of tobacco smoke: how we got here and where next. Ann Oncol. 2003 Mar;14(3):353–357. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray N. Low-tar cigarettes: bane or benefit. Cancer Detect Prev. 1987;10(3-4):187–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray N. Reflections on the saga of tar content: why did we measure the wrong thing? Tob Control. 2000 Mar;9(1):90–94. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.1.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoffmann D., Djordjevic M. V., Hoffmann I. The changing cigarette. Prev Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;26(4):427–434. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozlowski L. T., O'Connor R. J. Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I40–I50. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shiffman S., Pillitteri J. L., Burton S. L., Rohay J. M., Gitchell J. G. Smokers' beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes. Tob Control. 2001;10 (Suppl 1):i17–i23. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.suppl_1.i17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]