Abstract
Objective: To review critically the history of Australian tobacco industry efforts to avoid, delay, and dilute pack warnings on cigarettes.
Design: Systematic keyword and opportunistic website searches of tobacco industry internal documents made available through the Master Settlement Agreement.
Results: Four industry strategies and six recurrent arguments used by the industry are described, which were used to thwart the passage of three generations of health warnings (implemented in 1973, 1987, and 1995). These strategies are shown to have been associated with major delays in the implementation of the warnings and in keeping them inconspicuous, unattributed to the industry and non-specific, and particularly in delaying the use of warnings about addiction. The industry today continues to oppose warnings, which might "repel" smokers from tobacco use.
Conclusions: Efforts by governments to introduce potent health warnings will be resisted by the tobacco industry. Tobacco control advocates should anticipate and counter the strategies and arguments used by the industry, which are described in this paper if they wish to maximise the use of the pack as a vehicle for raising awareness about the harms of smoking.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (687.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Borland R., Hill D. The path to Australia's tobacco health warnings. Addiction. 1997 Sep;92(9):1151–1157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Francey N., Chapman S. "Operation Berkshire": the international tobacco companies' conspiracy. BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):371–374. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahood G. Warnings that tell the truth: breaking new ground in Canada. Tob Control. 1999 Winter;8(4):356–361. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.4.356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]