Abstract
Study objective: To identify and examine the strategies utilised by multinational tobacco companies to undermine and discredit key anti-tobacco activists and organisations in the Asian region.
Method: A series of case studies drawing upon material gathered through systematic reviews of internal tobacco industry documents.
Date sources: Tobacco industry documents made public as part of the settlement of the Minnesota Tobacco Trial and the Master Settlement Agreement.
Results: The industry sought to identify, monitor, and isolate key individuals and organisations. The way industry went about fulfilling this mandate in the Asian region is discussed. Industry targetted individuals and agencies along with the region's primary anti-smoking coalition.
Conclusions: Attack by multinational tobacco companies is a virtual quid pro quo for any individual or agency seriously challenging industry practices and policies. Understanding their tactics allows anticipatory strategies to be developed to minimise the effectiveness of these attacks.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (83.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chantornvong S., McCargo D. Political economy of tobacco control in Thailand. Tob Control. 2001 Mar;10(1):48–54. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.1.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mackay J. L. The politics of tobacco. Hong Kong Med J. 1998 Dec;4(4):411–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muggli M. E., Hurt R. D. Tobacco industry strategies to undermine the 8th World Conference on Tobacco or Health. Tob Control. 2003 Jun;12(2):195–202. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.2.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]