Abstract
Study objective: To review the tobacco industry's Asian environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) consultants programme, focusing on three key nations: China, Hong Kong, and Malaysia.
Methods: Systematic keyword and opportunistic website searches of formerly private internal industry documents.
Main results: The release of the 1986 US Surgeon General's report on second hand smoke provoked tobacco companies to prepare for a major threat to their industry. Asian programme activities included conducting national/international symposiums, consultant "road shows" and extensive lobbying and media activities. The industry exploited confounding factors said to be unique to Asian societies such as diet, culture and urban pollution to downplay the health risks of ETS. The industry consultants were said to be "...prepared to do the kinds of things they were recruited to do".
Conclusions: The programme was successful in blurring the science on ETS and keeping the controversy alive both nationally and internationally. For the duration of the project, it also successfully dissuaded national policy makers from instituting comprehensive bans on smoking in public places.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (97.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barnes D. E., Bero L. A. Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Fall;21(3):515–542. doi: 10.1215/03616878-21-3-515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnoya J., Glantz S. Tobacco industry success in preventing regulation of secondhand smoke in Latin America: the "Latin Project". Tob Control. 2002 Dec;11(4):305–314. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.4.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drope J., Chapman S. Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Aug;55(8):588–594. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.8.588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koo L. C. Dietary habits and lung cancer risk among Chinese females in Hong Kong who never smoked. Nutr Cancer. 1988;11(3):155–172. doi: 10.1080/01635588809513983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koo L. C., Lee N., Ho J. H. Do cooking fuels pose a risk for lung cancer? A case-control study of women in Hong Kong. Ecol Dis. 1983;2(4):255–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muggli M. E., Forster J. L., Hurt R. D., Repace J. L. The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies. Am J Public Health. 2001 Sep;91(9):1419–1423. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.9.1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muggli Monique E., Hurt Richard D., Blanke D. Douglas. Science for hire: a tobacco industry strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smoke. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Jun;5(3):303–314. doi: 10.1080/1462220031000094169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ong E. K., Glantz S. A. Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms. Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1749–1757. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tewes F. J., Koo L. C., Meisgen T. J., Rylander R. Lung cancer risk and mutagenicity of tea. Environ Res. 1990 Jun;52(1):23–33. doi: 10.1016/s0013-9351(05)80148-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]