Skip to main content
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2004 Dec;13(Suppl 2):ii51–ii57. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.008359

"The world's most hostile environment": how the tobacco industry circumvented Singapore's advertising ban

M Assunta, S Chapman
PMCID: PMC1766159  PMID: 15564221

Abstract

Objective: To review how tobacco transnational companies conducted their business in the hostile environment of Singapore, attempting to counter some of the government's tobacco control measures; to compare the Malaysian and the Singaporean governments' stance on tobacco control and the direct bearing of this on the way the tobacco companies conduct their business.

Methods: Systematic keyword and opportunistic website searches of formerly private internal industry documents.

Results: The comprehensive prohibition on advertising did not prevent the companies from advertising cigarettes to Singaporeans. Both British American Tobacco and Philip Morris used Malaysian television to advertise into Singapore. To launch a new brand of cigarettes, Alpine, Philip Morris used a non-tobacco product, the Alpine wine cooler. Other creative strategies such as innovative packaging and display units at retailers were explored to overcome the restrictions. Philip Morris experimented with developing a prototype cigarette using aroma and sweetened tipping paper to target the young and health conscious. The industry sought to weaken the strong pack warnings. The industry distributed anti-smoking posters for youth to retailers but privately salivated over their market potential.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (89.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Assunta M., Chapman S. A mire of highly subjective and ineffective voluntary guidelines: tobacco industry efforts to thwart tobacco control in Malaysia. Tob Control. 2004 Dec;13 (Suppl 2):ii43–ii50. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.008094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Assunta M., Chapman S. The tobacco industry's accounts of refining indirect tobacco advertising in Malaysia. Tob Control. 2004 Dec;13 (Suppl 2):ii63–ii70. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.008987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapman S., Carter S. M. "Avoid health warnings on all tobacco products for just as long as we can": a history of Australian tobacco industry efforts to avoid, delay and dilute health warnings on cigarettes. Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12 (Suppl 3):iii13–iii22. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Landman A. Push or be punished: tobacco industry documents reveal aggression against businesses that discourage tobacco use. Tob Control. 2000 Sep;9(3):339–346. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.3.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee Kelley, Gilmore Anna B., Collin Jeff. Looking inside the tobacco industry: revealing insights from the Guildford Depository. Addiction. 2004 Apr;99(4):394–397. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00718.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES