Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2004 Dec;13(Suppl 2):ii79–ii87. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.009233

"If we can just ‘stall' new unfriendly legislations, the scoreboard is already in our favour": transnational tobacco companies and ingredients disclosure in Thailand

R MacKenzie, J Collin, K Sriwongcharoen, M Muggli
PMCID: PMC1766166  PMID: 15564225

Abstract

Objectives: To review the strategies employed by overseas cigarette manufacturers operating in Thailand to obstruct the passage and subsequent enforcement of national public health legislation, specifically the ingredients disclosure provision of the 1992 Tobacco Products Control Act.

Methods: Analysis of previously confidential tobacco industry documents relevant to non-compliance with the ingredients disclosure legislation.

Results: Requirement for disclosure of ingredients contained in cigarettes contained in the Tobacco Products Control Act was identified by transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) not only as a significant threat to their operations in Thailand, but as a dangerous global precedent. Industry documents reveal a determined campaign to block, stall, or amend the proposed regulation during the legislative process. Industry representatives petitioned the Ministry of Health to revise the requirement from by brand disclosure to a more palatable by company submission. Strategies were adapted in the wake of the passage of the Act. Most significantly, the industry in concert with embassies in Bangkok threatened the Thai government with appeals to international trade bodies on the grounds of violation of international agreements. Industry documents also reveal that as submission of ingredient lists appeared unavoidable, leading companies operating in Thailand endeavoured to confound the disclosure requirement by disguising ingredients and reformulating brand recipes.

Conclusions: The evidence presented highlights the importance of ingredients regulation and demonstrates how health policy can be transformed during its implementation. A greater understanding of trade agreements emerges as a priority for global tobacco control.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (98.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balbach E. D., Gasior R. J., Barbeau E. M. Tobacco industry documents: comparing the Minnesota Depository and internet access. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(1):68–72. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.1.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates C., McNeill A., Jarvis M., Gray N. The future of tobacco product regulation and labelling in Europe: implications for the forthcoming European Union directive. Tob Control. 1999 Summer;8(2):225–235. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.2.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bero Lisa. Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001 Nov 6;24:267–288. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.100901.140813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bettcher D., Shapiro I. Tobacco control in an era of trade liberalisation. Tob Control. 2001 Mar;10(1):65–67. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.1.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Callard C., Chitanondh H., Weissman R. Why trade and investment liberalisation may threaten effective tobacco control efforts. Tob Control. 2001 Mar;10(1):68–70. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.1.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chantornvong S., McCargo D. Political economy of tobacco control in Thailand. Tob Control. 2001 Mar;10(1):48–54. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.1.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chapman S. "Keep a low profile": pesticide residue, additives, and freon use in Australian tobacco manufacturing. Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12 (Suppl 3):iii45–iii53. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Collin J., Legresley E., MacKenzie R., Lawrence S., Lee K. Complicity in contraband: British American Tobacco and cigarette smuggling in Asia. Tob Control. 2004 Dec;13 (Suppl 2):ii104–ii111. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.009357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Collin Jeff, Lee Kelley, Gilmore Anna B. Unlocking the corporate documents of British American Tobacco: an invaluable global resource needs radically improved access. Lancet. 2004 May 29;363(9423):1746–1747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16334-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Connolly G. N., Wayne G. D., Lymperis D., Doherty M. C. How cigarette additives are used to mask environmental tobacco smoke. Tob Control. 2000 Sep;9(3):283–291. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.3.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Da Violante Georges, Zerrouk Naima, Richard Isabelle, Frendo Jean-Louis, Zhiri Azzédine, Li-Khuan René, Tricottet Viviane, Provot Gérard, Chaumeil Jean-Claude, Arnaud Philippe. Short term Caco-2/TC7 cell culture: comparison between conventional 21-d and a commercially available 3-d system. Biol Pharm Bull. 2004 Dec;27(12):1986–1992. doi: 10.1248/bpb.27.1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hammond R., Assunta M. The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: promising start, uncertain future. Tob Control. 2003 Sep;12(3):241–242. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.3.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee Kelley, Gilmore Anna B., Collin Jeff. Looking inside the tobacco industry: revealing insights from the Guildford Depository. Addiction. 2004 Apr;99(4):394–397. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00718.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mackay J. International aspects of US government tobacco bills. JAMA. 1999 May 19;281(19):1849–1850. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.19.1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Malone R. E., Balbach E. D. Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire? Tob Control. 2000 Sep;9(3):334–338. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.3.334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Muggli Monique E., LeGresley Eric M., Hurt Richard D. Big tobacco is watching: British American Tobacco's surveillance and information concealment at the Guildford depository. Lancet. 2004 May 29;363(9423):1812–1819. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16309-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pollay R. W., Dewhirst T. The dark side of marketing seemingly "Light" cigarettes: successful images and failed fact. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I18–I31. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vateesatokit P., Hughes B., Ritthphakdee B. Thailand: winning battles, but the war's far from over. Tob Control. 2000 Jun;9(2):122–127. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.2.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wayne G. Ferris, Connolly G. N. How cigarette design can affect youth initiation into smoking: Camel cigarettes 1983-93. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I32–I39. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES