Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1995 Mar;177(5):1159–1168. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.5.1159-1168.1995

Cin-mediated recombination at secondary crossover sites on the Escherichia coli chromosome.

F W Rozsa 1, P Viollier 1, M Fussenegger 1, R Hiestand-Nauer 1, W Arber 1
PMCID: PMC176719  PMID: 7868587

Abstract

The Cin recombinase is known to mediate DNA inversion between two wild-type cix sites flanking genetic determinants for the host range of bacteriophage P1. Cin can also act with low frequency at secondary (or quasi) sites (designated cixQ) that have lower homology to either wild-type site. An inversion tester sequence able to reveal novel operon fusions was integrated into the Escherichia coli chromosome, and the Cin recombinase was provided in trans. Among a total of 13 Cin-mediated inversions studied, three different cixQ sites had been used. In two rearranged chromosomes, the breakpoints of the inversions were mapped to cixQ sites in supB and ompA, representing inversions of 109 and 210 kb, respectively. In the third case, a 2.1-kb inversion was identified at a cixQ site within the integrated sequences. This derivative itself was a substrate for a second inversion of 1.5 kb between the remaining wild-type cix and still another cixQ site, thus resembling a reversion. In analogy to that which is known from DNA inversion on plasmids, homology of secondary cix sites to wild-type recombination sites is not a strict requirement for inversion to occur on the chromosome. The chromosomal rearrangements which resulted from these Cin-mediated inversions were quite stable and suffered no growth disadvantage compared with the noninverted parental strain. The mechanistic implications and evolutionary relevance of these findings are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (365.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arber W. Elements in microbial evolution. J Mol Evol. 1991 Jul;33(1):4–12. doi: 10.1007/BF02100190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arber W. Evolution of prokaryotic genomes. Gene. 1993 Dec 15;135(1-2):49–56. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90048-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Atlung T., Nielsen A., Rasmussen L. J., Nellemann L. J., Holm F. A versatile method for integration of genes and gene fusions into the lambda attachment site of Escherichia coli. Gene. 1991 Oct 30;107(1):11–17. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90291-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang A. C., Cohen S. N. Construction and characterization of amplifiable multicopy DNA cloning vehicles derived from the P15A cryptic miniplasmid. J Bacteriol. 1978 Jun;134(3):1141–1156. doi: 10.1128/jb.134.3.1141-1156.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feng J. A., Johnson R. C., Dickerson R. E. Hin recombinase bound to DNA: the origin of specificity in major and minor groove interactions. Science. 1994 Jan 21;263(5145):348–355. doi: 10.1126/science.8278807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fonstein M., Nikolskaya T., Zaporojets D., Nikolsky Y., Kulakauskas S., Mironov A. Tn10-mediated inversions fuse uridine phosphorylase (udp) and rRNA genes of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1994 Apr;176(8):2265–2271. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.8.2265-2271.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haffter P., Bickle T. A. Enhancer-independent mutants of the Cin recombinase have a relaxed topological specificity. EMBO J. 1988 Dec 1;7(12):3991–3996. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03287.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hiestand-Nauer R., Iida S. Sequence of the site-specific recombinase gene cin and of its substrates serving in the inversion of the C segment of bacteriophage P1. EMBO J. 1983;2(10):1733–1740. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01650.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huber H. E., Iida S., Arber W., Bickle T. A. Site-specific DNA inversion is enhanced by a DNA sequence element in cis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jun;82(11):3776–3780. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.11.3776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hughes K. T., Gaines P. C., Karlinsey J. E., Vinayak R., Simon M. I. Sequence-specific interaction of the Salmonella Hin recombinase in both major and minor grooves of DNA. EMBO J. 1992 Jul;11(7):2695–2705. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05335.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hughes K. T., Youderian P., Simon M. I. Phase variation in Salmonella: analysis of Hin recombinase and hix recombination site interaction in vivo. Genes Dev. 1988 Aug;2(8):937–948. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.8.937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hübner P., Arber W. Mutational analysis of a prokaryotic recombinational enhancer element with two functions. EMBO J. 1989 Feb;8(2):577–585. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03412.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Iida S. Bacteriophage P1 carries two related sets of genes determining its host range in the invertible C segment of its genome. Virology. 1984 Apr 30;134(2):421–434. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(84)90309-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Iida S., Hiestand-Nauer R. Localized conversion at the crossover sequences in the site-specific DNA inversion system of bacteriophage P1. Cell. 1986 Apr 11;45(1):71–79. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90539-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Iida S., Hiestand-Nauer R. Role of the central dinucleotide at the crossover sites for the selection of quasi sites in DNA inversion mediated by the site-specific Cin recombinase of phage P1. Mol Gen Genet. 1987 Jul;208(3):464–468. doi: 10.1007/BF00328140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Iida S., Huber H., Hiestand-Nauer R., Meyer J., Bickle T. A., Arber W. The bacteriophage P1 site-specific recombinase cin: recombination events and DNA recognition sequences. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:769–777. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Iida S., Meyer J., Kennedy K. E., Arber W. A site-specific, conservative recombination system carried by bacteriophage P1. Mapping the recombinase gene cin and the cross-over sites cix for the inversion of the C segment. EMBO J. 1982;1(11):1445–1453. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01336.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Iida S., Sandmeier H., Hübner P., Hiestand-Nauer R., Schneitz K., Arber W. The Min DNA inversion enzyme of plasmid p15B of Escherichia coli 15T-: a new member of the Din family of site-specific recombinases. Mol Microbiol. 1990 Jun;4(6):991–997. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb00671.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jaworski A., Hsieh W. T., Blaho J. A., Larson J. E., Wells R. D. Left-handed DNA in vivo. Science. 1987 Nov 6;238(4828):773–777. doi: 10.1126/science.3313728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson R. C., Bruist M. F., Simon M. I. Host protein requirements for in vitro site-specific DNA inversion. Cell. 1986 Aug 15;46(4):531–539. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90878-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson R. C. Mechanism of site-specific DNA inversion in bacteria. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1991 Oct;1(3):404–411. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80307-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kamp D., Chow L. T., Broker T. R., Kwoh D., Zipser D., Kahmann R. Site-specific recombination in phage mu. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 2):1159–1167. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1979.043.01.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kohara Y., Akiyama K., Isono K. The physical map of the whole E. coli chromosome: application of a new strategy for rapid analysis and sorting of a large genomic library. Cell. 1987 Jul 31;50(3):495–508. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90503-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McKenney K., Shimatake H., Court D., Schmeissner U., Brady C., Rosenberg M. A system to study promoter and terminator signals recognized by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Gene Amplif Anal. 1981;2:383–415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Moskowitz I. P., Heichman K. A., Johnson R. C. Alignment of recombination sites in Hin-mediated site-specific DNA recombination. Genes Dev. 1991 Sep;5(9):1635–1645. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.9.1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Plasterk R. H., Brinkman A., van de Putte P. DNA inversions in the chromosome of Escherichia coli and in bacteriophage Mu: relationship to other site-specific recombination systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Sep;80(17):5355–5358. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.17.5355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pridmore R. D. New and versatile cloning vectors with kanamycin-resistance marker. Gene. 1987;56(2-3):309–312. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90149-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Robertson B. D., Meyer T. F. Genetic variation in pathogenic bacteria. Trends Genet. 1992 Dec;8(12):422–427. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90325-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sandmeier H. Acquisition and rearrangement of sequence motifs in the evolution of bacteriophage tail fibres. Mol Microbiol. 1994 May;12(3):343–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01023.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Segall A. M., Roth J. R. Approaches to half-tetrad analysis in bacteria: recombination between repeated, inverse-order chromosomal sequences. Genetics. 1994 Jan;136(1):27–39. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Segall A., Mahan M. J., Roth J. R. Rearrangement of the bacterial chromosome: forbidden inversions. Science. 1988 Sep 9;241(4871):1314–1318. doi: 10.1126/science.3045970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Silverman M., Zieg J., Hilmen M., Simon M. Phase variation in Salmonella: genetic analysis of a recombinational switch. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):391–395. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Southern E. M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503–517. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang R. F., Kushner S. R. Construction of versatile low-copy-number vectors for cloning, sequencing and gene expression in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1991 Apr;100:195–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yanisch-Perron C., Vieira J., Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985;33(1):103–119. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90120-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. van de Putte P., Goosen N. DNA inversions in phages and bacteria. Trends Genet. 1992 Dec;8(12):457–462. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90331-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. van de Putte P., Plasterk R., Kuijpers A. A Mu gin complementing function and an invertible DNA region in Escherichia coli K-12 are situated on the genetic element e14. J Bacteriol. 1984 May;158(2):517–522. doi: 10.1128/jb.158.2.517-522.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES