Skip to main content
. 2002 Oct;88(4):357–362. doi: 10.1136/heart.88.4.357

Table 3.

Antiarrhythmic drugs and percentages of successful conversion

All patients (n=1138) Patients with no history of previous AF (n=883) Patients with history of paroxysmal AF (n=117) Patients with history of chronic AF (n=138)
Use of drugs
Any class I agent 132 (12%) 112 (13%) 14 (12%) 6 (4%)†
    Procainamide 92 (8%) 85 (10%) 3 (3%)* 4 (3%)*
    Quinidine 23 (2%) 16 (2%) 4 (3%) 3 (2%)
    Disopyramide 8 (1%) 3 (<1%) 2 (2%) 3 (2%)*
    Encainide 4 (<1%) 2 (<1%) 0% 2 (1%)
    Flecainide 6 (1%) 4 (<1%) 0% 2 (1%)
    Propafenone 24 (2%) 16 (2%) 5 (4%) 3 (2%)
Sotalol 55 (5%) 41 (5%) 8 (7%) 6 (4%)
Amiodarone 168 (15%) 137 (16%) 16 (14%) 15 (11%)
Any antiarrhythmic agent 317 (28%) 262 (30%) 32 (27%) 23 (17%)†
Successful conversion to sinus rhythm
Any class I agent 72% 74% 64% 50%
    Procainamide 70% 72% 33% 50%
    Quinidine 61% 69% 50% 33%
    Disopyramide 13% 0% 50% 0%
    Encainide 0% 0% 0% 0%
    Flecainide 17% 25% 0% 0%
    Propafenone 67% 69% 100% 0%
Sotalol 67% 73% 63% 33%
Amiodarone 79% 85% 63%† 6%‡
Any antiarrhythmic agent 80% 84% 72% 48%‡

Data are presented as actual patient numbers with percentages in the first half and percentages only in the second half.

*p < 0.05, †p < 0.01, ‡p < 0.001 v patients with no history of previous AF.

AF, atrial fibrillation.