Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1995 Aug;177(15):4385–4391. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.15.4385-4391.1995

Differential DNA secondary structure-mediated deletion mutation in the leading and lagging strands.

W A Rosche 1, T Q Trinh 1, R R Sinden 1
PMCID: PMC177188  PMID: 7635823

Abstract

The frequencies of deletion of short sequences (mutation inserts) inserted into the chloramphenicol acetyl-transferase (CAT) gene were measured for pBR325 and pBR523, in which the orientation of the CAT gene was reversed, in Escherichia coli. Reversal of the CAT gene changes the relationship between the transcribed strand and the leading and lagging strands of the DNA replication fork in pBR325-based plasmids. Deletion of these mutation inserts may be mediated by slipped misalignment during DNA replication. Symmetrical sequences, in which the same potential DNA structural misalignment can form in both the leading and lagging strands, exhibited an approximately twofold difference in the deletion frequencies upon reversal of the CAT gene. Sequences that contained an inverted repeat that was asymmetric with respect to flanking direct repeats were designed. With asymmetric mutation inserts, different misaligned structural intermediates could form in the leading and lagging strands, depending on the orientation of the insert and/or of the CAT gene. When slippage could be stabilized by a hairpin in the lagging strand, thereby forming a three-way junction, deletion occurred by up to 50-fold more frequently than when this structure formed in the leading strand. These results support the model that slipped misalignment involving DNA secondary structure occurs preferentially in the lagging strand during DNA replication.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (270.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bebenek K., Abbotts J., Roberts J. D., Wilson S. H., Kunkel T. A. Specificity and mechanism of error-prone replication by human immunodeficiency virus-1 reverse transcriptase. J Biol Chem. 1989 Oct 5;264(28):16948–16956. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bebenek K., Abbotts J., Wilson S. H., Kunkel T. A. Error-prone polymerization by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Contribution of template-primer misalignment, miscoding, and termination probability to mutational hot spots. J Biol Chem. 1993 May 15;268(14):10324–10334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bierne H., Ehrlich S. D., Michel B. The replication termination signal terB of the Escherichia coli chromosome is a deletion hot spot. EMBO J. 1991 Sep;10(9):2699–2705. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07814.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolivar F. Construction and characterization of new cloning vehicles. III. Derivatives of plasmid pBR322 carrying unique Eco RI sites for selection of Eco RI generated recombinant DNA molecules. Gene. 1978 Oct;4(2):121–136. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(78)90025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cha T. A., Alberts B. M. Effects of the bacteriophage T4 gene 41 and gene 32 proteins on RNA primer synthesis: coupling of leading- and lagging-strand DNA synthesis at a replication fork. Biochemistry. 1990 Feb 20;29(7):1791–1798. doi: 10.1021/bi00459a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooper D. N., Krawczak M. Mechanisms of insertional mutagenesis in human genes causing genetic disease. Hum Genet. 1991 Aug;87(4):409–415. doi: 10.1007/BF00197158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooper D. N., Krawczak M. The mutational spectrum of single base-pair substitutions causing human genetic disease: patterns and predictions. Hum Genet. 1990 Jun;85(1):55–74. doi: 10.1007/BF00276326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Debyser Z., Tabor S., Richardson C. C. Coordination of leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis at the replication fork of bacteriophage T7. Cell. 1994 Apr 8;77(1):157–166. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90243-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Drake J. W. A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 15;88(16):7160–7164. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. French S. Consequences of replication fork movement through transcription units in vivo. Science. 1992 Nov 20;258(5086):1362–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.1455232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Freund A. M., Bichara M., Fuchs R. P. Z-DNA-forming sequences are spontaneous deletion hot spots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Oct;86(19):7465–7469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.19.7465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Glickman B. W., Ripley L. S. Structural intermediates of deletion mutagenesis: a role for palindromic DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jan;81(2):512–516. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.2.512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gordenin D. A., Malkova A. L., Peterzen A., Kulikov V. N., Pavlov Y. I., Perkins E., Resnick M. A. Transposon Tn5 excision in yeast: influence of DNA polymerases alpha, delta, and epsilon and repair genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 1;89(9):3785–3789. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.9.3785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanawalt P. C. Transcription-coupled repair and human disease. Science. 1994 Dec 23;266(5193):1957–1958. doi: 10.1126/science.7801121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Inselburg J. Replication of colicin E1 plasmid DNA in minicells from a unique replication initiation site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jun;71(6):2256–2259. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.6.2256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Krawczak M., Cooper D. N. Gene deletions causing human genetic disease: mechanisms of mutagenesis and the role of the local DNA sequence environment. Hum Genet. 1991 Mar;86(5):425–441. doi: 10.1007/BF00194629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kunkel T. A. DNA replication fidelity. J Biol Chem. 1992 Sep 15;267(26):18251–18254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kunkel T. A. Misalignment-mediated DNA synthesis errors. Biochemistry. 1990 Sep 4;29(35):8003–8011. doi: 10.1021/bi00487a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu L. F., Wang J. C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(20):7024–7027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.20.7024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lovett M. A., Katz L., Helinski D. R. Unidirectional replication of plasmid ColE1 DNA. Nature. 1974 Sep 27;251(5473):337–340. doi: 10.1038/251337a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Luria S. E., Delbrück M. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 1943 Nov;28(6):491–511. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.6.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Maki H., Maki S., Kornberg A. DNA Polymerase III holoenzyme of Escherichia coli. IV. The holoenzyme is an asymmetric dimer with twin active sites. J Biol Chem. 1988 May 15;263(14):6570–6578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McHenry C. S. DNA polymerase III holoenzyme of Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Biochem. 1988;57:519–550. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.57.070188.002511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mellon I., Hanawalt P. C. Induction of the Escherichia coli lactose operon selectively increases repair of its transcribed DNA strand. Nature. 1989 Nov 2;342(6245):95–98. doi: 10.1038/342095a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ohshima A., Inouye S., Inouye M. In vivo duplication of genetic elements by the formation of stem-loop DNA without an RNA intermediate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Feb 1;89(3):1016–1020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.3.1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Papanicolaou C., Ripley L. S. An in vitro approach to identifying specificity determinants of mutagenesis mediated by DNA misalignments. J Mol Biol. 1991 Oct 5;221(3):805–821. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)80177-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pearson C. E., Ruiz M. T., Price G. B., Zannis-Hadjopoulos M. Cruciform DNA binding protein in HeLa cell extracts. Biochemistry. 1994 Nov 29;33(47):14185–14196. doi: 10.1021/bi00251a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pierce J. C., Kong D., Masker W. The effect of the length of direct repeats and the presence of palindromes on deletion between directly repeated DNA sequences in bacteriophage T7. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Jul 25;19(14):3901–3905. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.14.3901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Prentki P., Karch F., Iida S., Meyer J. The plasmid cloning vector pBR325 contains a 482 base-pair-long inverted duplication. Gene. 1981 Sep;14(4):289–299. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(81)90161-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rahmouni A. R., Wells R. D. Direct evidence for the effect of transcription on local DNA supercoiling in vivo. J Mol Biol. 1992 Jan 5;223(1):131–144. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90721-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ripley L. S. Frameshift mutation: determinants of specificity. Annu Rev Genet. 1990;24:189–213. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.24.120190.001201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ripley L. S. Model for the participation of quasi-palindromic DNA sequences in frameshift mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jul;79(13):4128–4132. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.13.4128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Roberts J. D., Nguyen D., Kunkel T. A. Frameshift fidelity during replication of double-stranded DNA in HeLa cell extracts. Biochemistry. 1993 Apr 20;32(15):4083–4089. doi: 10.1021/bi00066a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Roberts J. D., Thomas D. C., Kunkel T. A. Exonucleolytic proofreading of leading and lagging strand DNA replication errors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Apr 15;88(8):3465–3469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sinden R. R., Wells R. D. DNA structure, mutations, and human genetic disease. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1992 Dec;3(6):612–622. doi: 10.1016/0958-1669(92)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sinden R. R., Zheng G. X., Brankamp R. G., Allen K. N. On the deletion of inverted repeated DNA in Escherichia coli: effects of length, thermal stability, and cruciform formation in vivo. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):991–1005. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sinha N. K., Morris C. F., Alberts B. M. Efficient in vitro replication of double-stranded DNA templates by a purified T4 bacteriophage replication system. J Biol Chem. 1980 May 10;255(9):4290–4293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Streisinger G., Okada Y., Emrich J., Newton J., Tsugita A., Terzaghi E., Inouye M. Frameshift mutations and the genetic code. This paper is dedicated to Professor Theodosius Dobzhansky on the occasion of his 66th birthday. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1966;31:77–84. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sutcliffe J. G. Complete nucleotide sequence of the Escherichia coli plasmid pBR322. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 1):77–90. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1979.043.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tomizawa J., Sakakibara Y., Kakefuda T. Replication of colicin E1 plasmid DNA in cell extracts. Origin and direction of replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jun;71(6):2260–2264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.6.2260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Trinh T. Q., Sinden R. R. Preferential DNA secondary structure mutagenesis in the lagging strand of replication in E. coli. Nature. 1991 Aug 8;352(6335):544–547. doi: 10.1038/352544a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Trinh T. Q., Sinden R. R. The influence of primary and secondary DNA structure in deletion and duplication between direct repeats in Escherichia coli. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):409–422. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ussery D. W., Hoepfner R. W., Sinden R. R. Probing DNA structure with psoralen in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1992;212:242–262. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)12015-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Veaute X., Fuchs R. P. Greater susceptibility to mutations in lagging strand of DNA replication in Escherichia coli than in leading strand. Science. 1993 Jul 30;261(5121):598–600. doi: 10.1126/science.8342022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Vilette D., Uzest M., Ehrlich S. D., Michel B. DNA transcription and repressor binding affect deletion formation in Escherichia coli plasmids. EMBO J. 1992 Oct;11(10):3629–3634. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05447.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Weston-Hafer K., Berg D. E. Deletions in plasmid pBR322: replication slippage involving leading and lagging strands. Genetics. 1991 Apr;127(4):649–655. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.4.649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Weston-Hafer K., Berg D. E. Palindromy and the location of deletion endpoints in Escherichia coli. Genetics. 1989 Apr;121(4):651–658. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.4.651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu C. A., Zechner E. L., Hughes A. J., Jr, Franden M. A., McHenry C. S., Marians K. J. Coordinated leading- and lagging-strand synthesis at the Escherichia coli DNA replication fork. IV. Reconstitution of an asymmetric, dimeric DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. J Biol Chem. 1992 Feb 25;267(6):4064–4073. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zheng G. X., Kochel T., Hoepfner R. W., Timmons S. E., Sinden R. R. Torsionally tuned cruciform and Z-DNA probes for measuring unrestrained supercoiling at specific sites in DNA of living cells. J Mol Biol. 1991 Sep 5;221(1):107–122. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)80208-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES