Abstract
Backgroundaim: Mycophenolate mofetil could be a useful antiproliferative drug in glaucoma filtering surgery. In this study the authors set out to investigate whether growth inhibition of mycophenolate mofetil on human Tenon fibroblasts is mediated by guanosine depletion.
Methods: Cultured human Tenon fibroblasts were incubated in various concentrations of mycophenolate mofetil with and without supplementation of guanosine.
Results: Growth inhibition was concentration dependent. The effect could be completely antagonised by guanosine supplement.
Conclusion: Human Tenon fibroblasts depend on the de novo synthesis pathway of guanosine. No sufficient salvage pathway from purine degradation appears to exist.
Keywords: mycophenolate mofetil, fibroblast proliferation, guanosine depletion
The immunosuppressive drug mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is widely used in solid organ transplantation.1 MMF blocks the key enzyme inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) of the guanosine de novo synthesis.2 Especially in lymphocytes this leads to a shortage of guanosine and consequently to inhibition of cell proliferation. Other cells—that is, central nervous system cells employ a salvage pathway to produce guanosine from purine degradation (Fig 1).
In previous experiments we demonstrated that both short and long term incubation with MMF inhibits human Tenon fibroblast (HTF) proliferation.3 It might therefore be a potential modulator of conjunctival scarring after glaucoma surgery. It is not known whether this effect is achieved by blockage of the de novo synthesis of guanosine or via another mechanism. If guanosine is supplemented by HTF treated with MMF the growth inhibition should be bypassed if HTF employs de novo synthesis. In this study we investigated if HTF depend on de novo synthesis of guanosine or if growth inhibition is achieved in a different way.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
Cell culture
Human Tenon fibroblasts (HTF) were obtained from tissue explants of patients who underwent cataract surgery after informed written consent. After fixation of the tissue explant cells were grown as monolayers in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% FCS, penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), d-glucose (4.5 mg/ml), insulin (10 μg/ml; all Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany), and mercapto-ethanol (5×10−5 M, Sigma). Primary cultures were passaged at confluence by trypsinisation into 75 cm2 tissue flasks (Falcon, Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). Subsequent passages were divided 1:2 or 1:3 in DMEM with FCS of 10%. Cells from passages 3–7 were used for all experiments. During cultivation cells exhibited the same morphological phenotype. All cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 10% CO2.
Cell proliferation studies with guanosine
A total of 200 cells per well were seeded in 96 well plates and incubated with 1 μM and 10 μM of MMF (Cell Cept solution for intravenous application, Roche, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany) or without MMF. Each of these concentrations was also incubated with 100 µM guanosine (Sigma). After 7, 14, and 21 days cells were counted by staining with bisbenzimide (Sigma) (10 μg/ml) for 5 minutes at room temperature. Six visual fields were counted manually per well. Experiments were performed four times in triplicates.
RESULTS
Growth inhibition with MMF was concentration dependent and showed a decrease in proliferation with concentrations of 1 μM and 10 μM of MMF (Fig 2). There was no statistical significance between proliferation rate at day 7, 14, and 21. At day 7 growth inhibition was slightly lower compared to day 14 and 21. Incubation with 1 μM of MMF showed a proliferation rate of 79% at day 7, 71% at day 14 and 68% at day 21. When incubated with 10 μM of MMF the proliferation rate was 10%, 8%, and 6%.
Compared with the control proliferation rate at each day there was statistical significance. For example 1 μM of MMF showed a proliferation rate of 71% (SD 6.4; p<0.001) compared with the control (100%) after 14 days. When incubated with 10 µM of MMF the proliferation rate was reduced to 7.7% (SD 0.9; p<0.001). After 3 weeks 1 µM of MMF leads to a proliferation rate of 71% (SD 7.6; p<0.001), 10 µM to 6.3% (SD 0.7; p<0.001). Cell counts in wells supplemented with 100 μM guanosine were statistically equal to control.
DISCUSSION
Long standing success of trabeculectomies depends primarily on the healing response of subconjunctival Tenon fibroblasts. Antiproliferative agents such as mitomycin C (MMC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are widely used to modulate wound healing by a long term growth arrest and have therefore improved the success rate of trabeculectomies.4,5 But growth arrested HTF still produce growth factors which lead to a scarring response of surrounding unaffected HTF.6 This may explain, why in some patients glaucoma filtration surgery fails despite the use of antiproliferative agents. Because of that complete success is not guaranteed and also some major complications such as late bleb leakage or endophthalmitis are known.7,8
The use of the immunosuppressive MMF is a new approach to modulate wound healing. Inhibition of HTF proliferation by MMF is dose dependent. Concentrations leading to notable growth inhibition are not cytotoxic.3 Our experiments show that HTF are sensitive to guanosine depletion comparable to lymphocytes. In HTF no sufficient salvage pathway exists to produce guanosine from purine degradation.
Protein growth factors play also a substantial part in regulation of wound healing. Transforming growth factor β2 (TGFβ2) especially is known to have major stimulating effects on scarring.9 In the first clinical trials downregulation by blockage with TGFβ2 antibody was shown to be safe and led to a greater fall of intraocular pressure with a slightly lower intervention rate in a small series.10 Further experiments are therefore necessary to prove whether MMF also inhibits cytokine production by interference with RNA synthesis, as well as DNA synthesis. MMF could be a useful antiproliferative drug in glaucoma filtering surgery.
REFERENCES
- 1.Lipsky JJ. Mycophenolate mofetil. Lancet 1996;348:1357–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Allison AC, Kowalski WJ, Muller CJ, et al. Mycophenolic acid and brequinar, inhibitors of purine and pyrimidine synthesis, block the glycosylation of adhesion molecules. Transplant Proc 1993;25:67–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Heinz C, Hudde T, Heise K, et al. Antiproliferative effect of mycophenolate mofetil on cultured human Tenon fibroblasts. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:408–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen CW, Huang HT, Bair JS, et al. Trabeculectomy with simultaneous topical application of mitomycin-C in refractory glaucoma. J Ocul Pharmacol 1990;6:175–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.The Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study Group. Five-year follow-up of the Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;121:349–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Daniels JT, Occleston NL, Crowston JG, et al. Effects of antimetabolite induced cellular growth arrest on fibroblast-fibroblast interactions. Exp Eye Res 1999;69:117–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Akova YA, Bulut S, Dabil H, et al. Late bleb-related endophthalmitis after trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999;30:146–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Belyea DA, Dan JA, Stamper RL, et al. Late onset of sequential multifocal bleb leaks after glaucoma filtration surgery with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;124:40–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cordeiro MF, Bhattacharya SS, Schultz GS, et al. TGF-beta1, -beta2, and -beta3 in vitro: biphasic effects on Tenon’s fibroblast contraction, proliferation, and migration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:756–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Siriwardena D, Khaw PT, King AJ, et al. Human antitransforming growth factor beta(2) monoclonal antibody—a new modulator of wound healing in trabeculectomy: a randomized placebo controlled clinical study. Ophthalmology 2002;109:427–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Karlson P. Kurzes Lehrbuch der Biochemie für Mediziner und Naturwissenschaftler, 13th ed. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1988.