Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan;52(1):18–23. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.1.18

Table 2.

Results with autofluorescence (AF) and methylene blue (MB) staining compared with histological findings as the reference standard in 345 biopsies from patients with Barrett’s osophagus (BO); the results of video endoscopy (VE) alone are also shown (with respect to the respective accuracy achieved, no statistically significant differences were found among the different methods used). A positive biopsy was from either a suspicious area on VE or any of the two methods tested (AF and MB), or from the additional four quadrant biopsies

Cancer 12 True positive* 3 (25%) 6 (50%) 8 (67%)
HGD 19 True positive* 5 (26%) 9 (47%) 8 (42%)
LGD 88 True positive* 11 (13%) 12 (14%) 14 (16%)
Normal BO 226 True negative† 206 (91%) 205 (91%) 214 (95%)

*Sensitivity of AF, MB, or VE in the detection of cancer, HGD, and LGD, respectively.

†Specificity of AF, MB, or VE in the correct recognition of normal BO (see text for positive and negative predictive values).

HGD, high grade dysplasia; LGD, low grade dysplasia.