Abstract
Background: Gene therapy is an innovative therapeutic approach for cancer. An adenoviral vector expressing the tumour suppressor p53 gene (Ad/p53) is currently under clinical evaluation for various cancers. We recently developed a binary adenoviral vector system that can express the strong proapoptotic gene Bax (Ad/PGK-GV16+Ad/GT-Bax: Ad/Bax).
Aims: To evaluate the potential of Bax gene therapy for gastric cancer, we assessed its antitumour effect in comparison with that of p53.
Methods: The human gastric cancer cell lines MKN-1, MKN-7, MKN-28, and MKN-45 were treated with Ad/Bax or Ad/p53, and cell viability, transgene expression, and caspase activation were assessed in vitro. To compare the antitumour effects of Ad/Bax and Ad/p53 treatment in vivo, subcutaneous tumours and peritoneal dissemination of MKN-45 cells were generated in nude mice. Each mouse underwent intratumoral or intraperitoneal administration of viruses and the growth of implanted tumours was observed after treatment.
Results: Treatment with Ad/Bax and Ad/p53 resulted in marked Bax and p53 protein expression and effective apoptosis induction in MKN-1, MKN-7, and MKN-28 cells in vitro. In contrast, MKN-45 cells showed resistance to Ad/p53 and only treatment with Ad/Bax resulted in activation of caspase 3 expression and massive apoptosis. Ad/Bax treatment was more effective in suppressing both subcutaneous and peritoneally disseminated MKN-45 tumours compared with Ad/p53 treatment.
Conclusion: Ad/Bax treatment significantly inhibited the growth of even p53 resistant gastric cancer in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, adenovirus mediated Bax gene transfer may be useful in gene therapy for gastric cancers.
Keywords: gastric cancer, gene therapy, Bax, p53, adenovirus
Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the world, especially in Eastern Asia. Although in its early stages the disease is treatable with endoscopic or surgical resection, advanced gastric cancer does not generally respond to conventional chemotherapy or radiotherapy.1 In view of the fact that the antitumour effect of most chemotherapeutics is mediated through induction of apoptosis, refractoriness of gastric cancer may be due to its non-susceptibility to apoptosis. Therefore, altering the threshold of apoptosis in this cancer would be a rationale strategy. Gene therapy is being established as a promising new modality based on emerging knowledge in molecular biology, and it is an attractive alternative for treatment of gastric cancer.
Clinically, p53 is one of the most potent genes in gene therapy for cancer.2,3 Activation of p53 leads to either G1 arrest through induction of p21 expression or apoptosis, in part by activation of Bax expression.4 Introduction of the p53 gene via a recombinant adenovirus has been shown to inhibit the growth of various cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, including gastric cancer cells.5–11 However, other previous reports showed that cancer cells expressing wild-type p53 are relatively resistant to treatment with the p53 gene; thus they may not be appropriate targets for this gene.12,13 In fact, p53 gene transfer was insufficient for controlling the growth of gastric tumours with cells expressing wild-type p53.10
Bax is a strong proapoptotic gene that causes cytochrome c release from mitochondria, activates the caspase pathway, and leads to apoptosis.14,15 We developed a binary adenoviral vector system for Bax overexpression.16 Our system can transfer the Bax gene and induce apoptosis in vivo. Therefore, in this study, we examined the therapeutic potential of the Bax gene in gastric cancer cell lines, as a more effective strategy than use of the p53 gene. We clearly show that adenovirus mediated Bax gene transfer is a more potent gene therapy modality for gastric cancer in both an in vivo subcutaneous tumour model and intraperitoneal dissemination model.
METHODS
Cell lines and adenoviruses
The human gastric cancer cell lines MKN-1, MKN-7, MKN-28, and MKN-45 were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. MKN-1, MKN-7, and MKN-28 are homozygous for a mutation in p53 at codon 143 (Val to Ala), 278 (Pro to Ser), and 251 (Ile to Leu), respectively. MKN-45 contains wild-type p53. The adenoviral vectors used in this study were the following: recombinant adenoviruses regulated by the GAL 4/TATA (GT) minimal synthetic promoter and containing human Bax-α gene cDNA (Ad/GT-Bax) or Escherichia coli β-galactosidase gene (Ad/GT-LacZ); the GAL4/VP16 fusion protein (GV16) transactivating protein for the GT promoter under the control of the 3-phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) promoter (Ad/PGK-GV16); and human wild-type p53 gene regulated by the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter enhancer (Ad/CMV-p53; namely Ad/p53).16,17 All of the viruses were propagated in a package containing 293 cells, purified twice via ultracentrifugation in a cesium chloride gradient, and subjected to dialysis. The titre for each virus vector was determined according to the absorbency of the dissociated virus at A260 nm and using the plaque assay.18 Each titre described in this report is expressed in viral particles (vp) and was determined according to OD260 nm rather than plaque forming units (pfu). The vp:pfu titre ratio for the vectors used in the study was 30–100:1. In a binary vector system, expression of the Bax gene can be induced by transferring Ad/GT-LacZ or Ad/GT-Bax into target cells along with Ad/PGK-GV16. For this purpose Ad/GT-LacZ or Ad/GT-Bax was mixed with Ad/PGK-GV16 at a ration of 1:1 (namely Ad/LacZ and Ad/Bax, respectively).
β-galactosidase expression
Cells were plated in 24 well culture plates at a density of 3×104 cell/well and infected with Ad/LacZ at a multiplicity of infection (MOI, vp/cell) ranging from 0 to 7500. After 48 hours, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (X-gal) was used as a substrate to evaluate β-d-galactosidase expression, which was indicated by a blue precipitate in the cell.
Assay of cell viability
Cells were plated in 96 well plates at a density of 5000 cells/well and infected with Ad/LacZ, Ad/p53, or Ad/Bax at an MOI of 5000 24 hours later. Cell viability was assessed 24, 48, and 72 hours after adenoviral infection using a colorimetric assay with tetrazolium blue dye 2,3 -bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulphenyl)-(2-H)-tetrazolium-5-carboxamide (XTT) and the Cell Proliferation Kit II (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.19 The experiments were performed at least twice for each cell line. To examine a dose dependent effect of Ad/Bax, MKN-45 cells were infected with increasing MOIs of Ad/Bax and cell viability was assessed 72 hours after viral infection.
Hoechst staining
Cells were plated in 12 well plates at a density of 3×104cells/well and infected with Ad/LacZ or Ad/Bax at an MOI of 5000 24 hours later. Forty eight hours after infection, cells were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde for two hours and stained with Hoechst 33258.
Western blot analysis
Cells were placed in a 10 cm tissue culture dish and infected with each virus at an MOI of 5000 for 72 hours. Cells were then washed with ice cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and lysed with the addition of 100 μl of 2× sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) buffer. Protein concentration of the total cell lysates was determined using a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Melville, New York, USA). Lysates (40 μg/lane) were separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gels and then electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membranes at 15 V for 30 minutes. After blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin in washing buffer containing 140 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris HCl pH 7.8, and 0.05% Tween 20, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C and thereafter incubated with the corresponding peroxidase linked secondary antibodies at 37°C for one hour. Signals were developed using a standard enhanced chemiluminescence method following the manufacturer’s protocol (Amersham Bioscience, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA).
Animal experiments
Human gastric cancer MKN-45 xenografts were established in six week old female nude mice (Balb/c nu/nu) through subcutaneous inoculation of 2×106 MKN-45 cells into the dorsal flank. Each tumour reached a diameter of approximately 3–5 mm six days after inoculation; each mouse was then given an intratumoral injection of 100 μl of 2×1010 vp of Ad/LacZ, Ad/CMV-p53, or Ad/Bax. Tumours were measured 2–3 a week, and tumour volume was calculated using the equation a×b2×0.5, in which a and b are the largest and smallest diameters, respectively. Animals were killed when their tumour reached a diameter of approximately 15 mm. To develop peritoneally disseminated xenografts of human gastric cancer, mice were inoculated with 2×106 MKN-45 cells into the peritoneal cavity. Also, to assess the efficiency of adenoviral gene transfer into the peritoneally disseminated tumours, mice were injected with 200 μl of 3×1010 vp of Ad/LacZ into the peritoneal cavity 26 days after inoculation of MKN-45 cells. These mice were killed 48 hours later, and X-gal staining was performed. To assess the antitumour effect of the viruses, mice were given an intraperitoneal injection of 200 μl of 2×1010 vp of each virus six days after inoculation of MKN-45 cells. Mice were killed 24 days after injection, and all visible disseminated tumours were counted and weighed. The survival study was also performed for all four groups.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t test with the statistical software program (DA Stats).
RESULTS
Adenovirus mediated gene transfer into gastric cancer cell lines
The efficiency of adenovirus mediated gene transfer into gastric cancer cell lines was assessed using X-gal staining 48 hours after infection with Ad/LacZ with a binary adenoviral vector system. Ad/LacZ transferred the LacZ gene into these cell lines. An MOI of 5000 was chosen for further in vitro study because it provided maximum transduction efficacy and minimal intrinsic toxicity in these cell lines. More than 90% of MKN-1 (as per fig 1 ▶), MKN-28, and MKN-45 cells and 55.2% of MKN-7 cells stained positively for X-gal (fig 1 ▶). These data demonstrated that a binary adenoviral vector system is capable of efficient transgene expression in human gastric cancer cell lines.
Inhibition of cell growth in vitro
To evaluate the antitumour effect of the Bax gene in gastric cancer cells, cells were treated with Ad/Bax. Cell viability was determined using the XTT assay 24, 48, and 72 hours after infection. The resulting data were compared with those of treatment with Ad/p53. Treatment with both Ad/Bax and Ad/p53 significantly suppressed the growth of MKN-1, MKN-7, and MKN-28 cells. However, only treatment with Ad/Bax significantly suppressed cell viability in MKN-45 cells (fig 2A ▶); treatment with Ad/p53 was not effective. Infection with Ad/Bax produced a dose dependent inhibition of tumour growth in MKN-45 cells (fig 2B ▶). The gastric cancer cell lines that retained wild-type p53 expression, such as MKN-45, appeared to be resistant to p53 treatment.
Gene expression and induction of apoptosis
Expression of Bax, p53, and caspase 3 protein in MKN-1, MKN-28, and MKN-45 cells was detected using western blot analysis. Weak expression of Bax protein was detected in all three human gastric cancer cell lines without Ad/Bax infection (fig 3 ▶). As the most frequent abnormality of the Bax gene is a frameshift mutation that causes truncated undetectable Bax protein,20 the result revealed that these gastric cancer cell lines contained the wild-type Bax gene. A high level of expression of Bax and p53 protein was observed in these cell lines when they were infected with Ad/Bax and Ad/p53, respectively, at an MOI of 5000 for 72 hours (fig 3 ▶). When MKN-1 and MKN-28 cells were treated with either Ad/Bax or Ad/p53, procaspase 3 protein expression was diminished, which means that caspase 3 was activated by cleavage. In MKN-45 cells, activation of caspase 3 was observed only with treatment with Ad/Bax and not Ad/p53 (fig 3 ▶). On Hoechst staining, both Ad/p53 and Ad/Bax treatment resulted in an apoptotic morphology with features such as condensation of chromatin in MKN-1 and MKN-28. This morphology was observed only in Ad/Bax treated MKN-45 cells however (fig 4 ▶). These data demonstrated that Ad/p53 treatment induced apoptosis by activating the caspase cascade in MKN-1 and MKN-28, but not in MKN-45, cells. Only Ad/Bax was effective in triggering apoptosis even in MKN-45 cells that were refractory to Ad/p53.
Ad/Bax suppressed subcutaneous MKN-45 tumour growth
The efficacy of Ad/Bax treatment of subcutaneous tumours derived from Ad/p53 resistant MKN-45 cells was further assessed. Each virus was injected directly into the established tumours, and eight animals per group were monitored for changes in tumour size after injection. Only treatment with Ad/Bax significantly suppressed tumour growth compared with controls. Mean tumour volume in the Ad/Bax group was only 236.5 (83.8) mm3 whereas that of the Ad/p53 group was 515.2 (151.9) mm3, 35 days after inoculation (p<0.01). Although treatment with Ad/p53 suppressed tumour growth compared with no treatment (p<0.05), the difference compared with Ad/LacZ treatment was not significant (fig 5 ▶).
Inhibition of peritoneal dissemination by intraperitoneal injection of Ad/Bax
One of the best measures of the extent of gastric cancer is peritoneal dissemination. To further assess the efficacy of Bax gene transfer, peritoneal disseminated MKN-45 tumours were generated in nude mice. To examine transgene expression by a binary vector system in vivo, Ad/LacZ was injected into the peritoneal cavity of the mice; their organs were subjected to X-gal staining 48 hours later. The LacZ gene was transferred mainly into the superficial layers of the peritoneal tumours and not normal tissue (fig 6A ▶). This was consistent with the expectation that deeper levels of an implanted tumour may not be infected by an adenovirus, administered when the macroscopic tumour was established. Unexpectedly, transgene expression was relatively selective to the tumour surface and few of the peritoneal cells stained blue. This may be due to differences in susceptibility to adenoviral infection between the implanted tumour and surrounding normal peritoneum. These data showed that a binary adenoviral vector system is capable of transferring the LacZ gene to a tumour via intraperitoneal administration.
The efficacy of Ad/Bax treatment was then assessed using the same MKN-45 peritoneally disseminated model. Ad/LacZ, Ad/p53, or Ad/Bax was injected into the peritoneal cavity six days after inoculation when the tumour was microscopic to maximise the efficiency of adenoviral gene transfer. Both the total number and weight of the intraperitoneal tumours were assessed 24 days after treatment in each group. The mean total number in the Ad/p53 group was 14.75 (2.44) while that in the Ad/Bax was 5.5 (3.32). Also, the mean total tumour weight in the Ad/p53 group was 371.8 (44.0) μg while that in the Ad/Bax group was 161.9 (96.9) μg, demonstrating that Ad/Bax treatment significantly suppressed intraperitoneal tumour growth (p<0.01). Although the difference in tumour number and weight between the Ad/p53 and no treatment groups was significant (p<0.01), that between the Ad/p53 and Ad/LacZ groups was not significant (fig 6B, C ▶). Survival curves for all four groups are shown in fig 6D ▶. Control mice without treatment all died within 42 days of tumour inoculation. Only three of eight mice treated with Ad/p53 survived for 60 days after tumour inoculation whereas six of eight mice treated with Ad/Bax survived.
DISCUSSION
Cancer can be attributed in part to defects in the regulation of apoptotic cell death. Failure to trigger apoptosis also renders cancers resistant to anticancer therapy. Recent studies of regulation of apoptosis at the molecular level have raised expectations of development of effective apoptosis targeting therapies such as gene therapy. Gene therapy has been explored as a new strategy against various cancers; it has even been studied in clinical trials.2,3 Adenovirus mediated p53 gene transfer has been extensively studied to evaluate its clinical application in gene therapy for various cancers.5–11 Several groups have reported on the use of experimental gene therapy against gastric cancers using the p53 gene. Tatebe et al examined the effect of a p53 adenoviral vector on gastric cancer cell lines in vitro. They found that some of the cell lines were resistant to this p53 treatment. These authors speculated that the difference in treatment outcome may have been due to different bcl-2 family protein statuses.9 Also, Ohashi et al reported that an adenovirus carrying p53 effectively inhibited the growth of p53 mutant gastric tumours in mice.10 However, it failed to suppress the growth of MKN-45 cells carrying wild type p53. This finding is consistent with reports by others showing that cancer cells carrying wild-type p53 are relatively resistant to treatment with the p53 gene.12,13 The Bax gene may serve as a good alternative to p53 for gene therapy for cancer, not only because it may kill cancer cells directly but also because it may increase their sensitivity to other antitumour treatments. Researchers have shown that Bax overexpression enhances apoptosis after treatment with chemotherapeutic agents in human breast cancer cells21 and ovarian cancer cells,22 and after radiotherapy in human breast cancer cells.23 Based on this evidence, Bax gene therapy may improve on current conventional cancer therapy.
Our previous studies demonstrated that overexpression of Bax protein in a binary adenoviral mediated system can express Bax protein and induce apoptosis in vivo in lung and prostate cancer models.13,24,25 In the present study, we demonstrated that Bax gene transfer effectively induced apoptosis in gastric cancer cells and suppressed gastric tumour growth both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we demonstrated that adenovirus mediated Bax gene transfer effectively killed even p53 resistant gastric cancer cells.
Recent preclinical studies of disseminated gastric cancer included intraperitoneal injection of a fusogenic liposome containing a mutated degenerin gene26 and cisplatin encapsulated by a transferring conjugated liposome.27 To evaluate the antitumour effect of the Bax gene on peritoneal gastric tumours, we performed intraperitoneal injection of the adenoviral vector Ad/Bax. Our results showed that injection of Ad/Bax suppressed the growth of disseminated gastric cancer in the peritoneal cavity and prolonged the survival of mice. On staining of visceral organs and tumours with X-gal, we found that the gene of interest had been transferred to the surface of the peritoneal tumours, although it appeared to be difficult to deliver the gene into the deeper layers of the tumours via intraperitoneal injection of the adenoviral vectors. Therefore, we began treatment only six days after intraperitoneal inoculation of MKN-45 cells when the tumours were only microscopic nodules. This experiment may mimic the postoperative peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer without other clinical or radiological evidence of the disease, supposing the use of adjuvant therapy. Unlike intratumoral injection of adenoviral vectors, intraperitoneal injection results in dilution of the virus solution in the peritoneal cavity and reduction of transduction efficacy. Therefore, use of a more potent gene than p53 that can accomplish this purpose with lower transgene copy numbers is required. Based on this viewpoint, the Bax gene is more suitable than the p53 gene for inducing apoptosis of cancer cells. Theoretically, Bax gene transfer with a replication incompetent adenovirus can kill only transduced cells. Use of a replication competent adenovirus or in combination with another modality such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy may improve treatment outcomes.
As it is a strong proapoptotic gene, overexpression of Bax may also induce apoptosis of normal cells. In fact, we previously demonstrated that intravenous infusion of a Bax expressing adenoviral vector induced rapid massive apoptosis of hepatocytes in mice.16 However, there was very little Bax expression in normal organs after intraperitoneal injection of the adenovirus, and macroscopic examination showed that the liver of mice treated with Ad/Bax was similar to that in mice treated with other vectors. Reports by others suggested that systemic absorption of an adenovirus from the peritoneal cavity sometimes occurred after intraperitoneal injection of the adenovirus.28
Intraperitoneal injection of an adenovirus once a week showed no abnormalities on biochemistry tests and haematoxylin and eosin staining of sections of the various organs.29 In the present study, macroscopic examination showed that the liver of mice treated with an adenovirus was slightly swollen, independent of the gene transferred. Although we tested only one dosing schedule of three sequential intraperitoneal injections in this study, other schedules may reduce the toxicity.
In conclusion, application of Ad/Bax may be useful for treating gastric cancer cells in spite of the status of the p53 gene.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by grants from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture, Japan; grants from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan (Health Sciences Research Grants (Research on Human Genome and Gene Therapy)); a grant from the National Cancer Institute and National Institutes of Health (PO1 CA78778) to (JAR); a SPORE grant (2P50 CA70907) to (JAR); and the WM Keck Foundation (JAR). SK is supported by Research Fellowships from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists. We thank Yoshiko Shirakiya for technical assistance and Alma Vega for her expert assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
Abbreviations
GT, GAL4/TATA
GV16, GAL4/VP16 fusion protein
PGK, 3-phosphoglycerate kinase
CMV, cytomegalovirus
vp, viral particles
pfu, plaque forming units
MOI, multiplicity of infection
X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside
XTT, 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulphenyl)-(2H)-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide
PBS, phosphate buffered saline
SDS, sodium dodecyl sulphate
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
REFERENCES
- 1.Wanebo HJ, Kennedy BJ, Chmie J, et al. Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American Collage of Surgeons. Ann Surg 1993;218:583–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Roth JA, Nguyen D, Lawrence DD, et al. Retrovirus-mediated wild-type p53 gene transfer to tumors of patients with lung cancer. Nat Med 1996;2:985–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Swisher SG, Roth JA, Nemunaitis J, et al. Adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transfer in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:763–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Levine AJ. p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell 1997;88:323–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fujiwara T, Grimm EA, Mukhopadhyay T, et al. Induction of chemosensitivity in human lung cancer cells in vivo by adenovirus-mediated transfer of the wild-type p53 gene. Cancer Res 1994;54:2287–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Spitz FR, Nguyen D, Skibber JM, et al. In vivo adenovirus-mediated p53 tumor suppressor gene therapy for colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 1996;16:3415–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bouvet M, Bold RJ, Lee J, et al. Adenovirus-mediated wild-type p53 tumor suppressor gene therapy induces apoptosis and suppresses growth of human pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5:681–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nielsen LL, Lipari P, Dell J, et al. Adenovirus-mediated p53 gene therapy and paclitaxel have synergistic efficacy in models of human head and neck, ovarian, prostate, and breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1998;4:835–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tatebe S, Matsuura T, Endo K, et al. Adenovirus-mediated transfer of wild-type p53 gene results in apoptosis or growth arrest in human cultured gastric cancer cells. Int J Oncol 1999;15:229–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ohashi M, Kanai F, Ueno H, et al. Adenovirus mediated p53 tumor suppressor gene therapy for human gastric cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Gut 1999;44:366–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shimada H, Shimizu T, Ochiai T, et al. Preclinical study of adenoviral p53 gene therapy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today 2001;31:597–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Harris MP, Sutjipto S, Wills KN, et al. Adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transfer inhibits growth of human tumor cells expressing mutant p53 protein. Cancer Gene Ther 1996;3:121–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kagawa S, Gu J, Swisher SG, et al. Antitumor effect of adenovirus-mediated Bax gene transfer on p53-sensitive and p53-resistant cancer lines. Cancer Res 2000;60:1157–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jurgensmeier JM, Xie Z, Deveraux Q, et al. Bax directly induces release of cytochrome c from isolated mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:4997–5002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pastorino JG, Chen ST, Tafani M, et al. The overexpression of Bax produces cell death upon induction of the mitochondrial permeability transition. J Biol Chem 1998;273:7770–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kagawa S, Pearson SA, Ji L, et al. A binary adenoviral vector for expressing high levels of the proapoptotic gene bax. Gene Ther 2000;7:75–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ji L, Bouvet M, Price RE, et al. Reduced toxicity, attenuated immunogenicity and efficient mediation of human p53 gene expression in vivo by an adenovirus vector with deleted E1, E3 and inactivated E4 by GAL4-TATA promoter replacement. Gene Ther 1999;6:393–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fang B, Ji L, Bouvet M, et al. Evaluation of GAL4/TATA in vivo. Induction of transgene expression by adenovirally mediated gene codelivery. J Biol Chem 1998;273:4972–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Roehm NW, Rodgers GH, Hatfield SM, et al. An improved colorimetric assay for cell proliferation and viability utilizing the tetrazolium salt XTT. J Immunol Methods 1991;142:257–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mrozek A, Petrowsky H, Sturm I, et al. Combined p53/Bax mutation results in extremely poor prognosis in gastric carcinoma with low microsatellite instability. Cell Death Differ 2003;10:461–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wagener C, Bargou RC, Daniel PT, et al. Antitumor activity of bax and p53 naked gene bax-α sensitizes cultured breast cancer cells to drug-induced apoptosis. Int J Cancer 1996;67:138–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Strobel T, Swanson L, Korsmeyer T, et al. BAX enhances paclitaxel-induced apoptosis through a p53-independent pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:14094–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sakakura C, Sweeney EA, Shirahama T, et al. Overexpression of bax sensitizes human breast cancer MCF-7 cells to radiation-induced apoptosis. Int J Cancer 1996;67:101–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li X, Marani M, Yu J, et al. Adenovirus-mediated Bax overexpression for the induction of therapeutic apoptosis in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2001;61:186–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Honda T, Kagawa S, Spurgers KB, et al. A recombinant adenovirus expressing wild-type Bax induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cells independently of their Bcl-2 status and androgen sensitivity. Cancer Biol Ther 2002;1:163–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Horimoto M, Sasaki Y, Ugawa S, et al. A novel strategy for cancer therapy by mutated mammalian degenerin gene transfer. Cancer Gene Ther 2000;7:1341–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Iinuma H, Maruyama K, Okinaga K, et al. Intracellular targeting therapy of cisplatin-encapsulated transferrin-polyethylene glycol liposome on peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer. Int J Cancer 2002;99:130–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Grace MJ, Xie L, Musco ML, et al. The use of laser scanning cytometry to assess depth of penetration of adenovirus p53 gene therapy in human xenograft biopsies. Am J Pathol 1999;155:1869–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Saimura M, Nagai E, Mizumoto K, et al. Intraperitoneal injection of adenovirus-mediated NK4 gene suppresses peritoneal dissemination of pancreatic cancer cell line AsPC-1 in nude mice. Cancer Gene Ther 2002;9:799–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]