Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1995 Oct;177(20):5937–5942. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.20.5937-5942.1995

Characterization of Mu prophage lacking the central strong gyrase binding site: localization of the block in replication.

M L Pato 1, M Karlok 1, C Wall 1, N P Higgins 1
PMCID: PMC177422  PMID: 7592347

Abstract

Bacteriophage Mu contains an unusually strong DNA gyrase binding site (SGS), located near the center of its genome, that is required for efficient Mu DNA replication (M. L. Pato, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7056-7060, 1994; M. L. Pato, M. M. Howe, and N. P. Higgins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:8716-8720, 1990). Replication of wild-type Mu initiates about 10 min after induction of a lysogen, while replication in the absence of the SGS is delayed about an hour. To determine which step in the replication pathway is blocked in the absence of the SGS, we inactivated the SGS by deletion and by insertion and studied the effects of these alterations on various stages of Mu DNA replication. Following induction in the absence of a functional SGS, early transcription and synthesis of the Mu-encoded replication proteins occurred normally. However, neither strand transfer nor cleavage at the Mu genome termini could be detected 40 min after induction. The data are most consistent with a requirement for the SGS in the efficient synapsis of the Mu prophage termini to form a separate chromosomal domain.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (314.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Condemine G., Smith C. L. Transcription regulates oxolinic acid-induced DNA gyrase cleavage at specific sites on the E. coli chromosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Dec 25;18(24):7389–7396. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.24.7389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Craigie R., Mizuuchi K. Transposition of Mu DNA: joining of Mu to target DNA can be uncoupled from cleavage at the ends of Mu. Cell. 1987 Nov 6;51(3):493–501. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90645-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Craigie R., Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. Site-specific recognition of the bacteriophage Mu ends by the Mu A protein. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(2 Pt 1):387–394. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Drlica K. Control of bacterial DNA supercoiling. Mol Microbiol. 1992 Feb;6(4):425–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01486.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kavenoff R., Ryder O. A. Electron microscopy of membrane-associated folded chromosomes of Escherichia coli. Chromosoma. 1976 Mar 31;55(1):13–25. doi: 10.1007/BF00288323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kruklitis R., Nakai H. Participation of the bacteriophage Mu A protein and host factors in the initiation of Mu DNA synthesis in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jun 10;269(23):16469–16477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kuo C. F., Zou A. H., Jayaram M., Getzoff E., Harshey R. DNA-protein complexes during attachment-site synapsis in Mu DNA transposition. EMBO J. 1991 Jun;10(6):1585–1591. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07679.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lavoie B. D., Chan B. S., Allison R. G., Chaconas G. Structural aspects of a higher order nucleoprotein complex: induction of an altered DNA structure at the Mu-host junction of the Mu type 1 transpososome. EMBO J. 1991 Oct;10(10):3051–3059. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07856.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leung P. C., Teplow D. B., Harshey R. M. Interaction of distinct domains in Mu transposase with Mu DNA ends and an internal transpositional enhancer. Nature. 1989 Apr 20;338(6217):656–658. doi: 10.1038/338656a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ljungquist E., Bukhari A. I. State of prophage Mu DNA upon induction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Aug;74(8):3143–3147. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.8.3143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lockshon D., Morris D. R. Sites of reaction of Escherichia coli DNA gyrase on pBR322 in vivo as revealed by oxolinic acid-induced plasmid linearization. J Mol Biol. 1985 Jan 5;181(1):63–74. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90324-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Martuscelli J., Taylor A. L., Cummings D. J., Chapman V. A., DeLong S. S., Cañedo L. Electron microscopic evidence for linear insertion of bacteriophage MU-1 in lysogenic bacteria. J Virol. 1971 Oct;8(4):551–563. doi: 10.1128/jvi.8.4.551-563.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mhammedi-Alaoui A., Pato M., Gama M. J., Toussaint A. A new component of bacteriophage Mu replicative transposition machinery: the Escherichia coli ClpX protein. Mol Microbiol. 1994 Mar;11(6):1109–1116. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00387.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mizuuchi K. Transpositional recombination: mechanistic insights from studies of mu and other elements. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:1011–1051. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.005051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mizuuchi M., Baker T. A., Mizuuchi K. Assembly of the active form of the transposase-Mu DNA complex: a critical control point in Mu transposition. Cell. 1992 Jul 24;70(2):303–311. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90104-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation. Cell. 1989 Jul 28;58(2):399–408. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90854-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mizuuchi M., Mizuuchi K. Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation. Cell. 1989 Jul 28;58(2):399–408. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90854-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pato M. L. Central location of the Mu strong gyrase binding site is obligatory for optimal rates of replicative transposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 19;91(15):7056–7060. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.7056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pato M. L., Howe M. M., Higgins N. P. A DNA gyrase-binding site at the center of the bacteriophage Mu genome is required for efficient replicative transposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Nov;87(22):8716–8720. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.22.8716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pato M., Banerjee M., Desmet L., Toussaint A. Involvement of heat shock proteins in bacteriophage Mu development. J Bacteriol. 1987 Dec;169(12):5504–5509. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.12.5504-5509.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ross W., Shore S. H., Howe M. M. Mutants of Escherichia coli defective for replicative transposition of bacteriophage Mu. J Bacteriol. 1986 Sep;167(3):905–919. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.3.905-919.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shortridge V. D., Pato M. L., Vasil A. I., Vasil M. L. Physical mapping of virulence-associated genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by transverse alternating-field electrophoresis. Infect Immun. 1991 Oct;59(10):3596–3603. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.10.3596-3603.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Snyder M., Drlica K. DNA gyrase on the bacterial chromosome: DNA cleavage induced by oxolinic acid. J Mol Biol. 1979 Jun 25;131(2):287–302. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90077-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Surette M. G., Buch S. J., Chaconas G. Transpososomes: stable protein-DNA complexes involved in the in vitro transposition of bacteriophage Mu DNA. Cell. 1987 Apr 24;49(2):253–262. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90566-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Surette M. G., Lavoie B. D., Chaconas G. Action at a distance in Mu DNA transposition: an enhancer-like element is the site of action of supercoiling relief activity by integration host factor (IHF). EMBO J. 1989 Nov;8(11):3483–3489. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08513.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Waggoner B. T., Marrs C. F., Howe M. M., Pato M. L. Multiple factors and processes involved in host cell killing by bacteriophage Mu: characterization and mapping. Virology. 1984 Jul 15;136(1):168–185. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(84)90257-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Waggoner B., Pato M., Toussaint A., Faelen M. Replication of mini-Mu prophage DNA. Virology. 1981 Aug;113(1):379–387. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(81)90163-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wahle E., Kornberg A. The partition locus of plasmid pSC101 is a specific binding site for DNA gyrase. EMBO J. 1988 Jun;7(6):1889–1895. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03022.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang Z., Harshey R. M. Crucial role for DNA supercoiling in Mu transposition: a kinetic study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 18;91(2):699–703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.2.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wijffelman C., Gassler M., Stevens W. F., van de Putte P. On the control of transcription of bacteriophage Mu. Mol Gen Genet. 1974;131(2):85–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00266145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Worcel A., Burgi E. On the structure of the folded chromosome of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1972 Nov 14;71(2):127–147. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90342-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yang Y., Ames G. F. DNA gyrase binds to the family of prokaryotic repetitive extragenic palindromic sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(23):8850–8854. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.8850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yoshida R. K., Miller J. L., Miller H. I., Friedman D. I., Howe M. M. Isolation and mapping of Mu nu mutants which grow in him mutants of E. coli. Virology. 1982 Jul 15;120(1):269–272. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(82)90027-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES